Author Topic: Trust We Can Believe In  (Read 2768 times)

headhuntersix

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 17271
  • Our forefathers would be shooting by now
Trust We Can Believe In
« on: July 19, 2008, 04:48:56 PM »
While serving as an Army infantry platoon leader in Iraq, it was my duty to earn the trust of my men — but also to learn to trust my men. Senator Obama, evidently, has not yet discovered that a commander-in-chief has a similar dual obligation. In a recent Army Times interview, he said he had to “earn the trust of the men and women of the military,” but he has yet to show that he trusts the judgment and first-hand knowledge of the generals, commanders, and soldiers on the ground. If anything, he’s gone out of his way to refute what those in the know say. If he wants his fast-approaching trip to the Middle East to be effective, this will need to change.

 
Commanders and troops, including our top commander, Gen. David Petraeus, have long been reporting that the surge is working, that we must protect and expand on our fragile-yet-reversible gains, and that Iraq is the central front in the War on Terror. And yet how many times has the junior Senator from Illinois called Iraq a “failed mission” or a “civil war”? He claims Iraq “is or never was” the central War on Terror front.


 




He’s also told us that “we are less safe and less secure” because of our presence in Iraq. To the contrary, we have not been attacked since 9/11. There will be a stable and freely elected government in the heart of the Middle East who are allies in the Global War on Terror. These facts can no longer be denied — it is inarguable that we are safer and more secure for liberating Iraq. With over 300 people advising Obama on foreign policy and national security issues, one would think that he’d have gotten the word already.

 
But we shouldn’t be surprised — after all, this is an election year. It is easy, almost trendy, to make these statements. But the American people are far from ignorant, and they want to bring our troops home with a win under their belts. We all have seen the tremendous success of the surge and know that a strategic victory is close at hand. Americans also realize that we must stay on offense against terror.

 
Unfortunately, the former “community organizer” has adopted the reckless national-security advice of George Soros and Moveon.org in order to win his party’s nomination. Senator Obama continually speaks about the lack of judgment of those supporting victory in Iraq, yet he’s continually demonstrated his lack of judgment on the most obvious — denouncing the surge not a month after it started, insisting on timelines for withdrawal before meeting with commanders on the ground, announcing a willingness to meet with dictators and despots unconditionally.

 
Senator Obama deserves applause for embarking on a first trip to Afghanistan and a long-overdue trip to Iraq, but it is this soldier’s hope for the senator to put politics aside and see for himself the undeniable progress that General Petraeus’ new counter-insurgency strategy has yielded.

 
Senator Obama should sit down one-on-one with our battle-hardened field commanders; men like generals Petraeus and Odierno, and ask them for advice. If he does so, he will be confronted with a stark choice, perhaps the most pivotal of his career: siding with our commanders on the ground, or continuing to side with George Soros and Moveon.org.


 — Captain Joel Arends served with the Army’s 1st Cavalry Division in Iraq
L

24KT

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 24454
  • Gold Savings Account Rep +1 (310) 409-2244
Re: Trust We Can Believe In
« Reply #1 on: July 19, 2008, 04:55:29 PM »
While serving as an Army infantry platoon leader in Iraq, it was my duty to earn the trust of my men — but also to learn to trust my men. Senator Obama, evidently, has not yet discovered that a commander-in-chief has a similar dual obligation. In a recent Army Times interview, he said he had to “earn the trust of the men and women of the military,” but he has yet to show that he trusts the judgment and first-hand knowledge of the generals, commanders, and soldiers on the ground. If anything, he’s gone out of his way to refute what those in the know say. If he wants his fast-approaching trip to the Middle East to be effective, this will need to change.

I started reading this, and thought it best to ask you to post references. Where exactly did you steal that article from?

I ask only because even though it says 'Obama' I wonder if perhaps the original author was not instead referring to Bush. I recall many reports of military personnel vehemently upset that Bush was not following the advise of the Generals in charge of the war. this has led to many a resignation.

So please post the links to the pages from which you plagiarized that article.

thanks.  :)
w

OzmO

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22846
  • Drink enough Kool-aid and you'll think its healthy
Re: Trust We Can Believe In
« Reply #2 on: July 19, 2008, 04:58:48 PM »



He’s also told us that “we are less safe and less secure” because of our presence in Iraq. To the contrary, we have not been attacked since 9/11.
 


That's the same flawed logic that conspiracy theorists use to show 9/11 was a inside job.   


HAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHA HAHAHAHAHAH


Those 2 sentences alone shows this article is written for mental midgets.   



24KT

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 24454
  • Gold Savings Account Rep +1 (310) 409-2244
Re: Trust We Can Believe In
« Reply #3 on: July 19, 2008, 05:23:33 PM »

That's the same flawed logic that conspiracy theorists use to show 9/11 was a inside job.   


HAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHA HAHAHAHAHAH


Those 2 sentences alone shows this article is written for mental midgets.   


Which quite possibly explains why he chose it in the 1st place.  ;D

I'd like to point out that what it claims as Obama's assessment, also happens to be the conclusion of the NIE.
it seems Obama is aware of something thatthe National Intellegence Estimate is also aware of, ...but the neotaints haven't quite grasped yet. oh well {sigh}
w

youandme

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 11063
Re: Trust We Can Believe In
« Reply #4 on: July 19, 2008, 05:38:12 PM »

That's the same flawed logic that conspiracy theorists use to show 9/11 was a inside job.   


HAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHA HAHAHAHAHAH


Those 2 sentences alone shows this article is written for mental midgets.   




So since you have access to CIA material and other secure documents, can you tell us why this statement is flawed?


OzmO

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22846
  • Drink enough Kool-aid and you'll think its healthy
Re: Trust We Can Believe In
« Reply #5 on: July 19, 2008, 07:00:45 PM »
So since you have access to CIA material and other secure documents, can you tell us why this statement is flawed?


As obvious as that is, if you can't see it, i don't see the point.

Do you realize there's a white substance that been found to have been digested with in the last year by 95% of people who have heart attacks?

They found this same substance has been eaten at least 1 day a week by 80% of the people who have heart attacks?

 ::)

Seriously,  I'm not that surprised you can't see it.

Kill or be killed.

youandme

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 11063
Re: Trust We Can Believe In
« Reply #6 on: July 19, 2008, 07:57:54 PM »
Sounds like a conspiracy theory.

OzmO

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22846
  • Drink enough Kool-aid and you'll think its healthy
Re: Trust We Can Believe In
« Reply #7 on: July 19, 2008, 08:39:32 PM »
Sounds like a conspiracy theory.
::)


unbelievable.   

You can't even get with the example.   wow. 

Have a sandwich and maybe after wards you'll figure it out.

calmus

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3867
  • Time is luck.
Re: Trust We Can Believe In
« Reply #8 on: July 19, 2008, 08:41:43 PM »

"Trust we can believe in"

Where did you learn your English? Mexico?

youandme

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 11063
Re: Trust We Can Believe In
« Reply #9 on: July 19, 2008, 08:46:37 PM »
::)


unbelievable.   

You can't even get with the example.   wow. 

Have a sandwich and maybe after wards you'll figure it out.


I don't eat sandwiches, only when bulking.

OzmO

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22846
  • Drink enough Kool-aid and you'll think its healthy
Re: Trust We Can Believe In
« Reply #10 on: July 19, 2008, 09:13:24 PM »
I don't eat sandwiches, only when bulking.

Then your chance for a heart attack is significantly less if you subscribe to the "flawed cheesy sucker logic" those 2 sentences int he article demonstrate. 

Purge_WTF

  • Guest
Re: Trust We Can Believe In
« Reply #11 on: July 19, 2008, 09:22:12 PM »
Senator Obama should sit down one-on-one with our battle-hardened field commanders; men like generals Petraeus and Odierno, and ask them for advice. If he does so, he will be confronted with a stark choice, perhaps the most pivotal of his career: siding with our commanders on the ground, or continuing to side with George Soros and Moveon.org.

   ::)


OzmO

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22846
  • Drink enough Kool-aid and you'll think its healthy
Re: Trust We Can Believe In
« Reply #12 on: July 19, 2008, 09:29:08 PM »
   ::)



As if some people have already decided Obama will not consult with his Generals if elected president.

Some people are just stupid. 

The Coach

  • Guest
Re: Trust We Can Believe In
« Reply #13 on: July 19, 2008, 09:49:59 PM »
I started reading this, and thought it best to ask you to post references. Where exactly did you steal that article from?

I ask only because even though it says 'Obama' I wonder if perhaps the original author was not instead referring to Bush. I recall many reports of military personnel vehemently upset that Bush was not following the advise of the Generals in charge of the war. this has led to many a resignation.

So please post the links to the pages from which you plagiarized that article.

thanks.  :)

Your on a politics board, this no place for clueless libs. The "hair", "make up" and "nails" board is in the womens section.

calmus

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3867
  • Time is luck.
Re: Trust We Can Believe In
« Reply #14 on: July 19, 2008, 09:56:09 PM »
Your on a politics board, this no place for clueless libs. The "hair", "make up" and "nails" board is in the womens section.

Too bad we don't have a "dumb fucks" board for you....

Dos Equis

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 66434
  • I am. The most interesting man in the world. (Not)
Re: Trust We Can Believe In
« Reply #15 on: July 19, 2008, 10:02:01 PM »
As if some people have already decided Obama will not consult with his Generals if elected president.

Some people are just stupid. 

I think the point is he put the cart before the horse.  Consult with the people in the know, then announce military strategy, not the other way around. 

OzmO

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22846
  • Drink enough Kool-aid and you'll think its healthy
Re: Trust We Can Believe In
« Reply #16 on: July 19, 2008, 10:06:37 PM »
Your on a politics board, this no place for clueless libs. The "hair", "make up" and "nails" board is in the womens section.

What a shallow hateful attack.....


Mr. Hate is back!

The Coach

  • Guest
Re: Trust We Can Believe In
« Reply #17 on: July 19, 2008, 10:07:36 PM »
Too bad we don't have a "dumb fucks" board for you....

Thats not very nice coming from a peaceloving liberal.

The Coach

  • Guest
Re: Trust We Can Believe In
« Reply #18 on: July 19, 2008, 10:08:14 PM »
What a shallow hateful attack.....


Mr. Hate is back!

Hi Ozmo.

OzmO

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22846
  • Drink enough Kool-aid and you'll think its healthy
Re: Trust We Can Believe In
« Reply #19 on: July 19, 2008, 10:10:07 PM »
I think the point is he put the cart before the horse.  Consult with the people in the know, then announce military strategy, not the other way around. 

That may be the point of the article, but it uses flawed logic that appeals to the stupidest of people replacing common sense with skewed beliefs.

Aside form that:  These are campaign statements from Obama.  so what?   It's kind of stupid to split hairs.  

Have you started teaching your kids spanish yet?   ;)

OzmO

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22846
  • Drink enough Kool-aid and you'll think its healthy
Re: Trust We Can Believe In
« Reply #20 on: July 19, 2008, 10:10:54 PM »

Dos Equis

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 66434
  • I am. The most interesting man in the world. (Not)
Re: Trust We Can Believe In
« Reply #21 on: July 19, 2008, 10:11:42 PM »
That may be the point of the article, but it uses flawed logic that appeals to the stupidest of people replacing common sense with skewed beliefs.

Aside form that:  These are campaign statements from Obama.  so what?   It's kind of stupid to split hairs.  

Not hair splitting at all.  It's like Commander in Chief 101. 

OzmO

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22846
  • Drink enough Kool-aid and you'll think its healthy
Re: Trust We Can Believe In
« Reply #22 on: July 19, 2008, 10:13:47 PM »
Not hair splitting at all.  It's like Commander in Chief 101. 

Yeah,  if he was president already. 
But these are campaign statements.  Not presidential actions.  So dissecting is kind of silly. 


Teach your kids spanish yet?   ;D

24KT

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 24454
  • Gold Savings Account Rep +1 (310) 409-2244
Re: Trust We Can Believe In
« Reply #23 on: July 19, 2008, 10:16:17 PM »
Your on a politics board, this no place for clueless libs. The "hair", "make up" and "nails" board is in the womens section.

Maybe you ought to check it out? I think it's fair to assume you know very little about "hair", "make up" or "nails", and I know that anatomically, you're not much of a woman, but hey... you couldn't possibly be any more ill-equipped to participate on that board than you've already demonstrated yourself to be on this one. GO FOR IT!  :D  
w

Dos Equis

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 66434
  • I am. The most interesting man in the world. (Not)
Re: Trust We Can Believe In
« Reply #24 on: July 19, 2008, 10:18:04 PM »
Yeah,  if he was president already. 
But these are campaign statements.  Not presidential actions.  So dissecting is kind of silly. 


Teach your kids spanish yet?   ;D

They're not just campaign statements.  They are categorical statements about what he will do as Commander in Chief.  He's making these statements in an attempt to get people to make him Commander in Chief.  I think it's silly not to point out and focus on the fact he was been announcing military strategy without talking to the military.  

My kids know a little Spanish, but Obama can go suck an egg.   :)