Because it isn't newsworthy. I made it through about 2 minutes. That old man needs to hang it up already. He must need the money. 
"Old man"? For a moment, I thought you were confusing Bugliosi with McCain.
This "old man" makes an extremely credible argument for holding Bush et al. accountable for murder.
This is expected. I have yet to see any credible rebuttal of Bugliosi's charges against Bush.
So the next best thing for his opponents, is to dismiss him outright with acid barbs.
Bugliosi is not washed up. He's retired.
Read his book and tell me how absurd and washed up this man is.
In one respect it is easy you know. Bush lied repeatedly about Iraq's WMDs, Al Qaeda ties, and imminency of threat to the US.
Those lies were used to push this country to war (false pretenses). He lied to Congress and the American People.
He sent soldiers to their deaths b/c of his lies.
I can show you a long list of the lies if you like.
Did you ever wonder, Beach Bum, why Bush's lies about Iraq's threat to the US ALWAYS increased the perception of that alleged threat?
If Bush was relying just on the intel, why was it always one-sided in favor of war?
Never, not once, did the Bush administration ever make statements contrary to "Iraq is a grave, unique, immediate threat."
Do you see that?
