Author Topic: Remember when the crybaby libs stayed up all night in congress in protest?  (Read 1118 times)

240 is Back

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 102396
  • Complete website for only $300- www.300website.com
Now the Repubs are doing it too!

House GOP leaders vow to hold protest session all week

WASHINGTON (CNN) – A group of House Republicans stayed in session and continued energy speeches Monday despite the summer adjournment in hopes of pressuring Democrats for a vote on oil drilling.

The speeches, a mix of democratic defiance and political showmanship, were part of a plan to pressure House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-California, to hold votes on offshore drilling, nuclear power and other GOP energy proposals.

Republicans refused to leave the House floor on Friday and began five hours of speeches protesting against Democratic energy policies immediately after the House of Representatives adjourned for its annual five-week break.

OzmO

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22729
  • Drink enough Kool-aid and you'll think its healthy
Pathetic.

Can't we just round up every Congressman and Senator and force them to earn a living selling magazines door to door for the rest of the summer?

Eyeball Chambers

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 14344
  • Would you hold still? You're making me fuck up...
How hard is it to become a congressman anyway? 
S

240 is Back

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 102396
  • Complete website for only $300- www.300website.com
repubs are "sending shouts out to moses" while killing time.

good use of our tax dollars.  I'd cue up the old comments of neocunts here attacking the dems for doing the same thing, but you get the idea.

headhuntersix

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 17271
  • Our forefathers would be shooting by now
Yeah maybe if douchbags like Pelosi and reid would actually allow debate, the Repubs wouldn't have to do this.
L

Straw Man

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41015
  • one dwells in nirvana
Yeah maybe if douchbags like Pelosi and reid would actually allow debate, the Repubs wouldn't have to do this.

They're doing exactly what the Repubs used to do which is control the agenda by controlling what comes up for a debate/vote.

If the only "solution" the Repubs can come up with is to drill offshore then they should all resign and let someone else with better ideas do their job

240 is Back

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 102396
  • Complete website for only $300- www.300website.com

a_joker10

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1922
Pckens plan is a joke.
The people that will pay for that are the US and Texas governments.
The Pickens plan will require a massive increase in natural gas generation.
Who happen to own most of the natural gas generation in Texas why it Pickens.
It the same reason that he is touting natural gas in vehicles in California.

The only way presently to reduce greenhouse gasses is to either use more nuclear energy or start to develop large scale hydro projects.

Everything else is years in the future.
Z

youandme

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 10957
haha the PP plan is about 7-10 years away. Like Pickens knows this, and so do investors and VC, it will take years to find land plot it, government permissions, zoning, building, conecting with the power grid, and that is only if they can use the existing infrastructure of the utility companies which control and monopolize energy in many parts of the country.


Dreamweaver....lala

240 is Back

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 102396
  • Complete website for only $300- www.300website.com
haha the PP plan is about 7-10 years away.

How many years until nuclear energy as a viable alternative will be built?  15-20, correct?

How many years until domestic drilling can even contribute one drop?  3 minimum, and 6-8 on any meaningful scale?

IMO, wind, natural gas, nuclear, and drilling are all part of a well balanced plan.  You wouldn't put all you$ into one stock, you wouldn't make all your income come from one job.  Why would you put all your nation's energy flow into 1 source?

youandme

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 10957
How many years until nuclear energy as a viable alternative will be built?  15-20, correct?

How many years until domestic drilling can even contribute one drop?  3 minimum, and 6-8 on any meaningful scale?

IMO, wind, natural gas, nuclear, and drilling are all part of a well balanced plan.  You wouldn't put all you$ into one stock, you wouldn't make all your income come from one job.  Why would you put all your nation's energy flow into 1 source?

Actually it's more like 30 years, their is one groups of engineers that can get a plant on line and operational within 15-10. Well balanced plan everyone can agree on. Your right it takes baby steps before you can walk. Domestic drilling would be more of a psychological whisper report, than something that is tangible.

240 is Back

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 102396
  • Complete website for only $300- www.300website.com
Actually it's more like 30 years, their is one groups of engineers that can get a plant on line and operational within 15-10. Well balanced plan everyone can agree on. Your right it takes baby steps before you can walk. Domestic drilling would be more of a psychological whisper report, than something that is tangible.

i dont know why obama and mccain dont say "These are ALL good ideas, and I'll use them all!"

Instead, they have to both play divisive games about "I want to drill, but Obama has personally stopped it for the last 50 years" and "MCcain wants to change washington's energy policy from the last 30 years, problem is, he's been part of that problem for 30 years".

They're both being drama queens.

a_joker10

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1922
EPA act 2005
http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/D?c109:6:./temp/~c109O6Sd9a::

The Dems in congress and senate took out nuclear energy in 2007. Anything else is revisionist.
http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/getdoc.cgi?dbname=110_cong_bills&docid=f:h6enr.txt.pdf

All 3 plans have been in the Bush energy plans since 2005.

Its just that few in congress or senate has wanted to do any of it.

http://www.nytimes.com/2005/04/27/politics/27cnd-bush.html

Bush Urges More Nuclear Plants and Building Refineries on Bases
By MARIA NEWMAN

Published: April 27, 2005

President Bush said today that he wanted the United States to build more nuclear power plants, turn unused military bases into refineries and raise sales of more efficient cars to make America less dependent on foreign fuel sources.

The president, in an address to a conference of the Small Business Administration in Washington, said that he knew that people were concerned about the rising prices of oil. It was the second time this week that he addressed the topic, a tacit acknowledgement that the issue is beginning to weigh on the United States economy and on Mr. Bush's public approval ratings.

The president told his audience at the Washington Hilton that at a recent lunch with soldiers at Fort Hood, near his ranch in Crawford, Tex., one of the troops asked him why he simply did not lower gas prices.

"Obviously, gasoline prices were on his mind," Mr. Bush said. "I said, I wish I could. If I could, I would. I explained to him that the higher cost of gasoline is a problem that has been years in the making."

"Over the past decade, our energy consumption has increased by more than 12 percent, while our domestic production has increased by less than one-half of 1 percent," he added. "It's now time to fix it."

The president listed several strategies to respond to soaring gasoline prices, but all would take years to realize.

Three administration officials said on Tuesday that the White House would seek to have Mr. Bush's proposals incorporated into the energy bill that has already been passed by the House. The Senate is drafting an entirely new bill, partly out of concern that the House version is too generous to large oil companies and others in the energy sector. Today, Mr. Bush today called on Congress to give him an energy bill by summer.

The president also talked about using technology to find more sources of energy here at home. He said he wanted to encourage the construction of more nuclear power plants.

"Today's technology has made nuclear power safer, cleaner and more efficient than ever before," he said. "Nuclear power is now providing about 20 percent of America's electricity, with no air pollution or greenhouse gas emissions. Nuclear power's one of the safest, cleanest sources of power in the world, and we need more of it here in America."

The president said the United States had not ordered a new nuclear power plant since the 1970's, while France has built 58 plants in the same period and gets more than 78 percent of its electricity from nuclear power.

"Time for America to start building again," he said.

Noting that no oil refineries had been built in the United States since 1976, the president also said that he would encourage the building of new refining facilities on closed military bases, though he did not detail where or how many.

He also said he wanted to encourage more exploration of the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge for oil and natural gas.

"Technology now makes it possible to reach ANWR's hydrocarbons by drilling on just 2,000 acres of the 19 million acres of land," he said. "Because of the advances in technology, we can reach the oil deposits with almost no impact on land or local wildlife."

Mr. Bush also talked about a tax credit for gas-electric hybrid automobiles and for use of clean diesel, both addressed in his budget earlier this year. The hybrid tax break was left out of the energy bill passed by the House last week.

The Senate minority leader, Senator Harry Reid, Democrat of Nevada, called President Bush's initiatives "little more than half-measures and wrongheaded policies that will do nothing to address the current energy crisis or break the stranglehold that foreign oil has on our nation," The Associated Press said.

Mr. Reid said that a plan by Senate Democrats would offer more tax incentives - double the $8 billion approved by the House - and funnel more of the money to renewable energy sources and energy-efficiency measures.
Z

24KT

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 24455
  • Gold Savings Account Rep +1 (310) 409-2244


Do you guys even recall the crisis you guys went through last summer, when the entire southeast was undergoing the drought. There was barely enough water to cool down the nuclear plant, and morons upstream wanted to block the flow down to the plant. When will you guys ever learn.

Solar, Wind, and Ocean current technology is the way to go for a long tern, viavle, renewable and sustainable energy source.
w