Author Topic: Prosecutor calls researcher sole culprit in 2001 anthrax attacks  (Read 1365 times)

Dos Equis

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 63770
  • I am. The most interesting man in the world. (Not)
Looks like they got their man.  In addition to the evidence they cited, if this guy was innocent, he stood to make a lot of money just like Hatfield. 

Prosecutor calls researcher sole culprit in 2001 anthrax attacks
Story Highlights
NEW: Federal prosecutor says Bruce Ivins acted alone in attacks that killed five

Records say Ivins tried to mislead feds with false samples of bacteria

Justice Department releases hundreds of pages to public

Source tells CNN scientist borrowed machine to convert wet anthrax to powder

WASHINGTON (CNN) -- A federal prosecutor declared Army biological weapons researcher Bruce Ivins the sole culprit in the 2001 anthrax attacks Wednesday, after releasing a stack of documents from a "herculean" investigation that lasted nearly seven years.


Officials said biodefense researcher Bruce E. Ivins, seen here in 2003, committed suicide.

 "We are confident that Dr. Ivins was the only person responsible for these attacks," Jeffrey Taylor, the U.S. attorney for the District of Columbia, told reporters Wednesday afternoon.

The Justice Department released the documents implicating Ivins in the attacks, which killed five people and sickened more than a dozen people.

Authorities said Ivins committed suicide last week as federal prosecutors prepared to present the results of their investigation to a grand jury.

Taylor said prosecutors are "confident" they could have proved their case against him.

Ivins was the custodian of a flask of a highly purified anthrax spores that had "certain genetic mutations identical to the anthrax used in the attacks," according to the court documents unsealed Wednesday.

In an affidavit filed in support of a search warrant, U.S. Postal Inspector Thomas Dellafera said Ivins' laboratory at the U.S. Army Medical Institute of Infectious Diseases "afforded all of the equipment and containment facilities which would have been needed to prepare the anthrax letters used in the fall 2001 attacks."

He told investigators in March 2005 that he could "provide no legitimate reason for the extended [work] hours, other than 'home was not good' and that he went to the laboratory 'to escape' from his home life," the affidavit states.


The affidavit said that Ivins tried to mislead federal agents by submitting false samples of the bacteria from his lab to FBI agents for analysis.

Dellafera also said Ivins sent an e-mail a few days before the attacks that contained language similar to that in anthrax-laced letters sent to news organizations and senators.

The handwritten letters bore a Trenton, New Jersey, postmark and the date "9-11-01." They ended with "Death to America. Death to Israel. Allah is Great."

However, investigators soon began focusing not on Islamic militants but on staff at Fort Detrick, Maryland, the home of the Army institute.

A few days before the attacks, investigators say, Ivins had sent an e-mail to a person whose name was blacked out in the documents that warned that al Qaeda followers "for sure have anthrax and sarin gas" and used phrases "similar to the anthrax letters," the affidavit states.

The records include 14 search warrants, information used to request those warrants and summaries of what was found, a court official said. The official declined to be named because he was not authorized to speak publicly. See a list of items taken from Ivins' home (PDF)

The FBI released the evidence to the public after survivors and relatives of victims were briefed on the case, a government source familiar with the case said Tuesday.

The Justice Department asked U.S. District Judge Royce Lamberth to release the documents Wednesday morning, sources with knowledge of the investigation told CNN.

Ivins spent more than 30 years as a civilian microbiologist at the Army's biodefense lab at Fort Detrick, where he was trying to develop a better vaccine against the disease.

A lawyer for Ivins said last week that his client was not involved in the attacks, and that the pressure of the investigation led to his death.

The case will not be considered closed because of incomplete administrative details, the source said.

Officials say Ivins, 62, was found unconscious at his home July 27 and died at a Maryland hospital July 29, the same day he was to have discussed a plea deal with prosecutors.

A lawyer for Maureen Stevens, the widow of Bob Stevens, the first victim of the attacks, told CNN she was invited to the FBI briefing and will attend.

The tabloid photo editor died after inhaling anthrax that investigators believe was in a letter sent to American Media Inc., the publisher of the Sun and National Enquirer tabloids, at its offices in Boca Raton, Florida.

A source familiar with the investigation said Tuesday that in the fall of 2001, Ivins borrowed a machine that can convert wet anthrax -- the kind used at Fort Detrick where Ivins worked -- into dry powder -- the kind used in the anthrax letters.  See whether freeze-drying equipment could be a clue to the case »

Such machines, called lyophilizers, are not usually used at Fort Detrick, although they are easy to obtain.

Experts said the report may have no significance.

"I wouldn't necessarily make the conclusion that, just because he had access to a lyophilizer and used a lyophilizer , that that provides a smoking gun, that he must be using this for sinister purposes," said Peter Hotez, chairman of microbiology at George Washington University in Washington.

Richard Spertzel, a former biodefense scientist who worked with Ivins at the lab at Fort Detrick, said a more advanced machine than a lyophilizer would have been necessary.

"There is no way" that a lyophilizer could have created the fine spores contaminating the 2001 letters, he said. In addition, he said, no one working at a U.S. government lab could have produced such high-quality anthrax in secret.

Ivins became a suspect after investigators found DNA evidence from the 2001 anthrax mailings on a flask used in his laboratory at the institute, according to a source who is familiar with the investigation but not authorized to speak publicly about the case. No charges in the anthrax attacks have been made public.  Watch a former co-worker express doubt about Ivins' guilt »

Ivins, of Frederick, Maryland, had worked for decades in the biodefense lab at Fort Detrick, where he was trying to develop a better vaccine against the toxin.

The FBI had traced the anthrax used in the attacks to the lab by using a new technology, a U.S. official familiar with the investigation said.

Authorities were looking at whether Ivins may have released anthrax to test a vaccine he was working on, another official said.

Some of the anthrax-laced letters, written in crude block letters, included the words "Take penacilin (sic) now," according to photographs released by the FBI.

At the time of his death, Ivins was under a temporary restraining order sought by a social worker who had counseled him in private and group sessions. She accused him of having harassed, stalked and threatened her with violence.

The woman told the court in her complaint that Ivins had been treated at a mental health facility.

Steven Hatfill, another government scientist who was named by the Justice Department as a "person of interest" in the attacks, was never charged and later sued the department, which settled the case in June.

The skepticism in scientific circles about the strength of the case against Ivins heightens the importance of the government's unveiling of its evidence against the scientist, a former prosecutor said.

"I think the public and the survivors of the anthrax attacks are entitled to see the evidence before the grand jury," said Andrew McBride. "And if there was a draft indictment, and they were ready to indict Mr. Ivins, they ought to see that as well."

http://www.cnn.com/2008/CRIME/08/06/anthrax.case/index.html

240 is Back

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 102396
  • Complete website for only $300- www.300website.com
Re: Prosecutor calls researcher sole culprit in 2001 anthrax attacks
« Reply #1 on: August 06, 2008, 08:45:26 PM »
What was his motive?

Big fan of the Patriot Act?  Determined to help it pass?

Only an idiot would believe they weren't related.

Dos Equis

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 63770
  • I am. The most interesting man in the world. (Not)
Re: Prosecutor calls researcher sole culprit in 2001 anthrax attacks
« Reply #2 on: August 06, 2008, 08:57:14 PM »
He stood to make money off a vaccine (or antidote).  That was his motive. 

This must kill the CT nuts.  :)

240 is Back

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 102396
  • Complete website for only $300- www.300website.com
Re: Prosecutor calls researcher sole culprit in 2001 anthrax attacks
« Reply #3 on: August 06, 2008, 08:59:41 PM »
He stood to make money off a vaccine (or antidote).  That was his motive. 

This must kill the CT nuts.  :)

He only targeted Bush enemies, and those standing in the way of the patriot Act.

He stopped the senate debate by mailing it there.
He stopped the senate leaders (dems) by mailing it to them.
He stopped the lib media from reporting it by mailing it to them.

This must kill the sheep that yes, a member of the govt killed Americans and terrorized the nation for personal profit and for political motive.

FBI now admits it was an inside job, Ockers.  Just like the CTers said ;)

240 is Back

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 102396
  • Complete website for only $300- www.300website.com
Re: Prosecutor calls researcher sole culprit in 2001 anthrax attacks
« Reply #4 on: August 06, 2008, 09:03:55 PM »
You know what's weird here?

A member of the US Army mailed poison to americans for profit and political gain.

This is an inside job.

Just as if only 100 or 200 people in the govt knew about 911 or were involved.

it was an inside job.   FBI admits it.  The CTers were right on this one.

Whether it was 1 person, or 1000 people... a military men used his access to poison for terror purposes to pass the Patriot act.  Insane.  CTers = vindicated.

24KT

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 24455
  • Gold Savings Account Rep +1 (310) 409-2244
Re: Prosecutor calls researcher sole culprit in 2001 anthrax attacks
« Reply #5 on: August 06, 2008, 09:44:09 PM »
He only targeted Bush enemies, and those standing in the way of the patriot Act.

He stopped the senate debate by mailing it there.
He stopped the senate leaders (dems) by mailing it to them.
He stopped the lib media from reporting it by mailing it to them.

This must kill the sheep that yes, a member of the govt killed Americans and terrorized the nation for personal profit and for political motive.

FBI now admits it was an inside job, Ockers.  Just like the CTers said ;)


As much as the government claims this case is all wrapped up, ...don't count on it.
There's a lot here that just doesn't quite fly

http://today.msnbc.msn.com/id/21134540/vp/26030877#26015772
w

Hugo Chavez

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 31866
Re: Prosecutor calls researcher sole culprit in 2001 anthrax attacks
« Reply #6 on: August 06, 2008, 10:13:45 PM »
 ::)  Cheers to the dumbfucks ::)

Dos Equis

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 63770
  • I am. The most interesting man in the world. (Not)
Re: Prosecutor calls researcher sole culprit in 2001 anthrax attacks
« Reply #7 on: August 06, 2008, 11:47:39 PM »
Yeah, it must be a sinister government conspiracy.  The fumbling, bumbling George Bush pulled off yet another ingenious plot to murder Americans. 

Dos Equis

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 63770
  • I am. The most interesting man in the world. (Not)
Re: Prosecutor calls researcher sole culprit in 2001 anthrax attacks
« Reply #8 on: August 09, 2008, 10:57:47 AM »
Good explanation of evidence for and against Ivins.

Aug 9, 11:05 AM EDT
Analysis: What if a jury heard the anthrax case

By LARA JAKES JORDAN and MATT APUZZO
Associated Press Writers
 
The Justice Department laid out its case this past week that Army scientist Bruce Ivins mailed the anthrax powder that killed five people in 2001. Ivins committed suicide at his home near Fort Detrick, Md., which means the evidence gathered by the FBI and U.S. Postal Service inspectors will never be tested in an adversarial setting.

Based on Associated Press reporting on the investigation, the FBI documents released last week and interviews with lawyers, here is a look at what could have been opening statements from the government and the defense if Ivins had lived and the case had gone to trial.

---

For the prosecution:

Far less than one in a million. Those are the chances that the anthrax used to murder five people in late 2001 could have come from any place other than a flask kept by Dr. Bruce Ivins.

The same genetically unique anthrax strain, RMR-1029, which Bruce Ivins himself created. No other lab in the world stored RMR-1029 and nobody could obtain it without going through him.

That scientific evidence, combined with the other evidence the government plans to introduce in this case, will show beyond a reasonable doubt that Bruce Ivins is the man who killed five innocent victims in two separate mailings.

The evidence will show that shortly after the Sept. 11 terror attacks, this world-renowned anthrax expert began working odd hours in his lab - past midnight, during weekends - when no other researchers were around; something he had never done before; something he would never do again once the anthrax letters were mailed.

The evidence will show a man under great strain at the time. His anthrax vaccine work was being heavily criticized, and his program in danger of being shut down.

Days after the first letters were sent, Bruce Ivins wrote an e-mail about people in his group therapy sessions and their reactions to 9/11, calling himself "the only scary one in the group."

He also wrote that Osama bin Laden had anthrax and wanted to kill Americans and Jews - language that would be used a short time later in the letters included in the deadly envelopes.

The evidence will show that Bruce Ivins regularly drove long hours at night to deliver or mail packages, just as he did in this case. It will show his obsession with the sorority whose office is mere feet away from the mailbox in Princeton, N.J., where he posted the letters. It will show that the pre-stamped envelopes used to mail the anthrax, despite being mailed in New Jersey, very likely came from a post office near his home.

The evidence will show that the FBI asked for anthrax samples from all around the world. But when Bruce Ivins was asked to produce his, the evidence will show that he gave the FBI a false sample of his anthrax and not the RMR-1029 he had used in the attacks.

The defense will argue that some evidence in this case is circumstantial. That's fine. The court will tell you that circumstantial evidence is to be considered like any other evidence.

But one thing is not circumstantial: the murder weapon. The flask that held the exact and unique strain of anthrax used in the attacks. Bruce Ivins' flask. He owned it. He controlled it. And he used it to kill.

---

For the defense:

The government wants you to remember how afraid you were in 2001, when those poor people died. They want you to blame Bruce Ivins, so they made him out to be a mad scientist.

But like most mad scientist tales, this one is just a scary story.

The real story stars the FBI. The bureau wasted years chasing the wrong guy, a scientist named Steven Hatfill. After seven years, thousands of interviews and millions upon millions of dollars, agents need someone to blame.

But what evidence do they have?

They have some DNA, only not of Dr. Ivins. His DNA isn't anywhere close to this case. Not on the envelopes. Not on the tape used to seal them. Not at the mailbox. Nowhere.

Here's all we know for sure: The anthrax came from his lab at Fort Detrick.

Trouble is, about 100 scientists had access to that anthrax. Prosecutors say they're certain those 100 people didn't do it. But they won't tell you why. At trial, you're going to hear from FBI agents who, at one time, were just as certain the killer's name was Steven Hatfill. They were wrong then, too, and they're paying him $5.8 million to settle a lawsuit over that mistake.

Prosecutors say Ivins struggled with depression, family problems. He was in counseling. Does that make him a murderer? You're going to hear from colleagues and friends that Ivins is a decent, peaceful scientist - not a man who decided one day to kill.

And what will we hear from the government? They searched Ivins' home, cars, lab and computers. They read his e-mails. What did they find? Nothing. Not one fingerprint. Not a trace of anthrax.

They will say he borrowed a machine that could have turned anthrax into powder. There is no evidence he used that machine for anything other than his job. Those other 100 scientists had access to this machine, too. It's common lab equipment.

They will say he could have driven to New Jersey to mail the letters. Yet there are no gas receipts, no toll records, no witnesses. Best they can say is he liked to drive.

Maybe, prosecutors say, Ivins drove seven hours through the night to get to a sorority's storage office, then mailed the anthrax when he arrived. Of course, there's no evidence, but it sounds like something a mad scientist would do.

And what motive would this decorated scientist have to unleash biological terror? Prosecutors aren't sure. They've cooked up a theory that Ivins wanted to build support for a vaccine he helped develop.

But again, there's no evidence. And the government knows that. So if you don't buy that theory, they've got backups. Maybe he was angry at the media. Maybe he hated Catholics who support abortion rights.

This case is so important to the government, they're throwing everything out there.

But in the end, it's just a scary story.

----

EDITOR'S NOTE - Lara Jakes Jordan covers the Justice Department and Matt Apuzzo covers legal affairs for The Associated Press.
 
http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/A/ANTHRAX_OPENING_ARGUMENTS?refresh=1

Straw Man

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41015
  • one dwells in nirvana
Re: Prosecutor calls researcher sole culprit in 2001 anthrax attacks
« Reply #9 on: August 09, 2008, 04:28:20 PM »

As much as the government claims this case is all wrapped up, ...don't count on it.
There's a lot here that just doesn't quite fly

http://today.msnbc.msn.com/id/21134540/vp/26030877#26015772

Posner (in the video above) brings up a lot of good points and it really appears there are more questions than answers: 

More from Posner here:  http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3036677/#26062323