Your understanding of natural selection

[wavelength]

Your proof is opinion, nothing more, and is disputed my many world renowned thinkers and scientists.

As a scientist you should acknowledge a logic deduction as long as you are not able to challenge it.
If it's so easily disputed, why are you not able to do so? Review our Science vs. Religion thread and tell me where I could not back up my "opinion" 100%.

Falling back to "renowned thinkers and scientists" is an easy way out of a discussion, the same path I could easily take with certainly much greater minds than you have in store.

I can repeat my logic proof here again, if you think you able to dispute it this time around...?

Get used to it; Mr. Wienerschnitzel doesn't like talking facts...

Show me one single example of that.

[wavelength]

Wow, your ambiguous debating style is like grating my eyes on a cheese grater
By consciousness, I mean: being controlled.

Yes I understand, the answer is in the second part of the last post.

You guys act like we didn't already discuss all of that numerous times. Is your memory really that short?

[Nordic Superman]

Yes I understand, the answer is in the second part of the last post.

You guys act like we didn't already discuss all of that numerous times. Is your memory really that short?

Yes, the good Lord hath forsaken me with the memory of an amoeba

[wavelength]

Yes, the good Lord hath forsaken me with the memory of an amoeba

Mine's too actually, but knowing myself I just preassume that I have been uttering my catch phrases already.