Author Topic: tall = big - but a short guy need a lot of weight to be considered big  (Read 2966 times)

Bluto

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 33175
  • Well?
through history tall people automatically been considered big even though they have not weigh much.

clint eastwood never carried a lot of muscle, yet he's refered to as a "big guy" in magnum force from 1973. clint is 6' 2"

snoop dog is known as "big snoop" he's 6' 3½"

but for a short guy to be considered big, he needs a lot of weight doesnt he? or maybe some guys never are considered big, no matter how much they weigh just because theyre too short?

discuss
Z

m8

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 10794
Re: tall = big - but a short guy need a lot of weight to be considered big
« Reply #1 on: August 18, 2008, 09:47:28 AM »
yes isn't that amazing?

bigmc

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 23049
Re: tall = big - but a short guy need a lot of weight to be considered big
« Reply #2 on: August 18, 2008, 09:48:53 AM »
great thread  ::)
T

affeman

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 15236
  • Rusty Trombone looks like an abortion in a thong
Re: tall = big - but a short guy need a lot of weight to be considered big
« Reply #3 on: August 18, 2008, 09:49:18 AM »
snoop dog is known as "big snoop" he's 6' 3½"


m8

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 10794

Bluto

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 33175
  • Well?
Re: tall = big - but a short guy need a lot of weight to be considered big
« Reply #5 on: August 18, 2008, 09:58:50 AM »
thats big snoop! sliced and diced and dialed in without spilling over
Z

Stavios

  • Guest
Re: tall = big - but a short guy need a lot of weight to be considered big
« Reply #6 on: August 18, 2008, 10:19:06 AM »
thats big snoop! sliced and diced and dialed in without spilling over

 ;D ;D ;D

affeman

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 15236
  • Rusty Trombone looks like an abortion in a thong
Re: tall = big - but a short guy need a lot of weight to be considered big
« Reply #7 on: August 18, 2008, 10:28:05 AM »
On conditioning he can hold his own against Beckham, but Beckham dwarfs him on size. :o


m8

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 10794
Re: tall = big - but a short guy need a lot of weight to be considered big
« Reply #8 on: August 18, 2008, 10:34:08 AM »
On conditioning he can hold his own against Beckham, but Beckham dwarfs him on size. :o



Synthol biceps on Beckham.

Jeffro

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3614
Re: tall = big - but a short guy need a lot of weight to be considered big
« Reply #9 on: August 18, 2008, 10:36:42 AM »
On conditioning he can hold his own against Beckham, but Beckham dwarfs him on size. :o


Brutal 4 inch wrists on "Big" Snoop.  :-\

m8

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 10794
Re: tall = big - but a short guy need a lot of weight to be considered big
« Reply #10 on: August 18, 2008, 10:42:07 AM »
Brutal 4 inch wrists on "Big" Snoop.  :-\

all drugs.

Earl1972

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22045
  • #EarlToo
Re: tall = big - but a short guy need a lot of weight to be considered big
« Reply #11 on: August 18, 2008, 10:46:42 AM »
bluto seems to be obsessed with height

are you a short guy or a tall guy that feels your height is all you have going for yourself?

E
E

Bluto

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 33175
  • Well?
Re: tall = big - but a short guy need a lot of weight to be considered big
« Reply #12 on: August 18, 2008, 11:08:09 AM »
they dont ever say "big beckham" though

Z

Eric2

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2889
Re: tall = big - but a short guy need a lot of weight to be considered big
« Reply #13 on: August 18, 2008, 02:38:40 PM »
through history tall people automatically been considered big even though they have not weigh much.

clint eastwood never carried a lot of muscle, yet he's refered to as a "big guy" in magnum force from 1973. clint is 6' 2"

snoop dog is known as "big snoop" he's 6' 3½"

but for a short guy to be considered big, he needs a lot of weight doesnt he? or maybe some guys never are considered big, no matter how much they weigh just because theyre too short?

discuss



Clint Was 6'4. He had more muscle than most hollywood guys at this height and era.

h

dan18

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7307
  • I DID WHAT I DID BECAUSE I DO WHAT I WANT.
Re: tall = big - but a short guy need a lot of weight to be considered big
« Reply #14 on: August 18, 2008, 02:45:14 PM »
through history tall people automatically been considered big even though they have not weigh much.

clint eastwood never carried a lot of muscle, yet he's refered to as a "big guy" in magnum force from 1973. clint is 6' 2"

snoop dog is known as "big snoop" he's 6' 3½"

but for a short guy to be considered big, he needs a lot of weight doesnt he? or maybe some guys never are considered big, no matter how much they weigh just because theyre too short?

discuss

They call you big dickhead around theses parts and no ones ever seen a pic of you..
So why are you complaining
p

Bluto

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 33175
  • Well?
Re: tall = big - but a short guy need a lot of weight to be considered big
« Reply #15 on: August 18, 2008, 04:09:54 PM »
Z