THE ONE PICTURE THAT PUTS TO REST THE RONNIE VS. DORIAN ISSUE

[TrueGrit]

Bad gyno and NO calves, not even 12 inches.......

I thought Coleman had his glands out? Surprised he would get raging gyno this far down the line.

[SquatAss]

Ronnies chest KILLS Dorians!!!!

Ronnie kills Dorian everywhere but calves. Fact

[honest]

Ronnie never defeated Yates, Yates defeated Ronnie plenty of times, facts are facts. 

[ChinoXL]

this case has gone cold

[QuakerOats]

Ronnie never defeated Yates, Yates defeated Ronnie plenty of times, facts are facts. 

and someone played center field for the Yankees before Mickey Mantle.

[Bast000]

only thing that Dorian has on Ronnie is calves.

[honest]

Both a great bodybuilders, lets just get over it, shits getting old.

[Rudee]

Both them f@#ks helped killed bbing.  Well it was sick and dying already and they helped it along.  Never been a fan of science experiments.

Nor the English language.

[pumpster]

Ronnie never defeated Yates, Yates defeated Ronnie plenty of times, facts are facts. 

Classic IFBB brainwashing.

[Hulkster]

only thing that Dorian has on Ronnie is calves.

and abs (at his best)

but that is it.

[bigbobs]

and abs (at his best)

but that is it.

ND'S last and desperate defence is that the better bodybuilder is not judged on a sum of bodyparts, that's the defence he's trying to use in the Nasser vs. Dorian thread too after I pointed out that Yates only had better forearms, calves, and back

[marcus]

 

[IceCold]

pumpster: in the last pic, the "skin" tatoo is for you.

[marcus]

Those shots don't touch big Ron.

[Dballn247]

Seriously are we still discussing this. Gayer than oiled up men in thongs.

[m8]

Seriously are we still discussing this. Gayer than oiled up men in thongs.

Who is better: Dorian or Ronnie?

[Dballn247]

The white one.

[IceCold]

Those shots don't touch big Ron.

where were you from 92-97 when ronnie was more striated with better symmetry and balance?

[marcus]

I meant the pictures posted of Dorian don't come close to Ronnie.

[windsor88]

THEY BOTH SUCK COCK END OFF DISSCUSSION NOW WATCH YOUR MOUTHS CONVICTS!!!

You forgot to log into you "El_Pajero" account huh?   

[IceCold]

and abs (at his best)

but that is it.

you still dont get it.

its not the parts, but how they look as a whole.

you could argue that ronnie's chest, arms, delts, legs, etc. are better than dorian's - or are they?

ronnie, despite his "better" bodyparts, doesnt even come close to how yates looks as a whole shown here:






even though people had better bodyparts than yates, he made it work in the end, where and when it counted -throughout the contest. 

you can post all the bad pics of yates you want, you cant change history. 

especially the part where dorian beat ronnie for 6 years, which you cant get over.

[honest]

If you saw them both at their best in person, not in some magazine, in Olympia shape you will know why everyone still rates Yates as the best ever, overall he was incredible, the condition from head to toe was something Ronnie never achieved, He lost all side poses as his hamstrings to the side were non existent compared to Yates, to the rear as he has oil shot calves and higher lats and less lower lat development, and overall his torso to the front showed a man with huge long legs, big long arms and a very short torso with no hint of a midsection, thats why you lot dont judge, you have to take an educated look at the sum of all parts when judging, something that isnt going to happen here thats for sure.

[tu_holmes]

you will know why everyone still rates Yates as the best ever,

Funny... I still thought it was Arnold.

[PANDAEMONIUM]

The white one.

 

[gh2]

Well said, Honest!