Dave you're ignorant about competitive bodybuilding and its ok I'm ignorant about quantum mechanics the difference is I don't talk about as if I know what I'm stating , you do Dorian is easily the better conditioned of the two based on those two pics , Ronnie is HUGE and soft Dorian is HUGE and hard thats the difference if you prefer the former more power to you but that doesn't change facts.
Narc Diety seems to think Ronnie is huge and soft in this pic, i'll find the quote in a second.
Don't bother Ronnie is HUGE and SOFT in that pic compared to Dorian in this one
here it isthere's an awful lot of veins and striations on such a "soft" man don't you think?
yeah and Dorian is roughly half Ronnie's size in those pics.
Ronnie is insane looking right therehe will never be equaled
WOW Ronnie 538 pounds in that pic? Dorian is 269
may as well be, look at the pictures, visual proof doesn't lie.
you're such a fan-boy another failed thread by Dave M lol
Soft, definitely not but not O condition either. He's definitely off his best. But rediculously huge and sliced nonetheless. Rediculously.
how do you figure? i've got three people to this point saying Ronnie isn't soft to your one.
calm down fattie....I see you are growing your balls again ....remember being the BIGGEST biotch on get big ? courtesy of Derek ? hahahahahahahahaha
He's absolutely soft especially compared to the Yates photo I posted
hahhah only someone like ND would call that "soft"
hahahhaa, Ronnie's arms look bigger than Dorian's legs in those pics.
Compared to that Yates picture absolutely , no if ands or buts about it this is a picture of a very hard Ronnie , study it , learn from it
Ronnie has about 50 lbs of additional muscle in the side-chest pic that QuakerOats posted than the 98 shot.
He may be 50 pounds heavier but thats NOT dense hard muscle big difference he's obviously offseason and it shows
