Author Topic: Obama's bounce not as big as expected, why?  (Read 615 times)

youandme

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 10957
Obama's bounce not as big as expected, why?
« on: September 02, 2008, 10:23:14 AM »
Instead of posting insults we can post possible causes as why his bounce did not turn northernly as opposed to past Democratic conventions. This was big, and I would like to know how much more money was put into this convention as opposed to others.

Obama's bounce smaller than others David Paul Kuhn
Mon Sep 1, 10:38 PM ET
 


Barack Obama’s post-Democratic National Convention bounce in the polls appears to be slightly smaller than the norm of past conventions, and it's gradually depreciating.

ADVERTISEMENT
 
The Gallup daily tracking poll has found that since the conclusion of the convention, Obama has risen 4 percentage points in the polls, to lead McCain 49 percent to 43 percent today. That's a slightly smaller uptick in the polls than the 5- to 6-point bounce earned by a typical party nominee, by Gallup’s measure, since 1964. Obama and McCain were evenly split at 45 percentage points apiece prior to the Democratic convention, according to Gallup.

That outcome comes despite Obama’s speech before more than 80,000 people at Invesco Field in Denver on Thursday night, a political event that was also seen by about 40 million television viewers. It also comes as the Republican convention quietly got under way in St. Paul, and the national media gaze focuses southward to Hurricane Gustav.

Daily tracking polls by Gallup and Rasmussen Reports demonstrate that Obama has taken his greatest lead since July, if not the general election. But while Obama’s support remains significantly stronger than weeks ago, it appears that the post-convention bounce he earned may have already peaked.

On Saturday, Gallup reported Obama was ahead by 8 percentage points. By Monday, that lead had shrunk to 5 points. Rasmussen pegs Obama’s standing as relatively stable in recent days, with a 49 percent to 46 percent lead over McCain when “leaners” are included, a small but statistically insignificant improvement for McCain of 1 percentage point since Saturday.

CBS News reported Monday that Obama is now ahead in its poll, 48 to 40 percent, a 3-point uptick in Obama’s standing compared to its poll prior to the Democratic convention. Obama’s 3-point bounce exceeds that of John F. Kerry, the Democratic presidential nominee in 2004 who did not rise in the polls following his convention. But Obama’s bounce is less than a third of what Al Gore received in 2000 and Bill Clinton received in 1992. Even Bob Dole, following the 1996 Republican convention, received a 4-point bounce in the polls, 1 point more than Obama.

But any Obama bounce, if it is sustained, could be said to be a victory for Democrats. In the days since Obama gave his address, the news cycles have been captured by the unveiling of Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin as John McCain's running mate, the opening of the Republican convention and the threat posed by Hurricane Gustav.

There have been only three previous back-to-back conventions, most recently in 1956. The effect of the GOP convention on the polls will not be known for days.

A CNN/Opinion Research Corp. poll and a Zogby Interactive flash poll, both completed over the weekend, have found the presidential race is in a dead heat. According to both polls, Obama attained no statistically significant convention bounce.

Whether Obama is ahead or tied with McCain, the presumptive Republican nominee will now come into the Republican convention with his best opportunity yet to break through his own ceiling and take a lead in the presidential race.

 

CQ

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7018
  • TGT
Re: Obama's bounce not as big as expected, why?
« Reply #1 on: September 02, 2008, 10:34:18 AM »
One assumes the Palin announcement was the cause, and assumes McCain smartly planned that.

Some females instinct with her pick would be to be happy [I was] but as more comes out that may fade.

CNN had a poll up saying in the past week McCain polls numbers have dropped with women. I suspect they may keep dropping with that sector, as the teen daughter has made her radical reproduction stance, as well as McCain's past votes a "big issue" in the media....so I saw on TV...when normally they probably would not get much airtime.

Most women would feel opposite to those isses - especially the insurance for viagra but not the pill, so now they were brought to attention due to the teen pregnancy.

And women are a huge voting block.

Of course, I'm speculating wildly ;D

240 is Back

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 102396
  • Complete website for only $300- www.300website.com
Re: Obama's bounce not as big as expected, why?
« Reply #2 on: September 02, 2008, 10:59:51 AM »
I'm sure they outspent the repubs by a ton.  You already see increased cime in the city, dur to inadequate police forces.  Dems had damn near police state out there to keep protesters in line.

I think due to the divisive nature of politics and campaigns over the last 8 years, most people kinda already know where they were.  In 84, when Mondale picked a woman, he went from 16 points down, to TIED, in just a few days.  A 16 point swing like that is unheard of these days.

youandme

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 10957
Re: Obama's bounce not as big as expected, why?
« Reply #3 on: September 02, 2008, 11:01:44 AM »
went from 16 points down, to TIED, in just a few days.  A 16 point swing like that is unheard of these days.

2004 Gore, down by 8 points, after DNC up by 10.