Politico: Jewish voters may be wary of Palin

[240 is Back]

http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0908/13098.html

Palin’s pastor Larry Kroon = this month's Reverend Wright!

[240 is Back]

Ok but you havent even stopped to find out if its true or not and given her a chance to respond if it is true and you and others are already condeming her for it.

 i know the first statement - the antijewish one from the other thread - is true.  Politico has the tape linked and transcript.  I think it's nuts she attended that church for her whole adult life.

maybe she'll come out tomorrow and condemn it.  I doubt it tho.

[tonymctones]

i know the first statement - the antijewish one from the other thread - is true.  Politico has the tape linked and transcript.  I think it's nuts she attended that church for her whole adult life.

maybe she'll come out tomorrow and condemn it.  I doubt it tho.

all good and fine and in all honesty the pastor seems fishy to me from the research ive done on him nothing like obamas by any means as of yet but fishy.

I doubt she will either especially this week during the RNC maybe next week if needed.

Why is it 240 that you dont show conservatism unless called out and then only for a sec and go right back to your far left ways.

[240 is Back]

it's fun to debate whoever is in the news.  i mention ayers a few times a day, and that's years old.

this week has been unlike any other.  choosing a veep candidate without proper vetting - it'll never happen again, you know?  I'm reading other blogs and news sites, it's like another potential scandal comes out every hour.  The main two - the separist party and the church thing - could be the biggest.  It's unreal to see public vetting like this.  You NEVER see that.

[tonymctones]

it's fun to debate whoever is in the news.  i mention ayers a few times a day, and that's years old.

this week has been unlike any other.  choosing a veep candidate without proper vetting - it'll never happen again, you know?  I'm reading other blogs and news sites, it's like another potential scandal comes out every hour.  The main two - the separist party and the church thing - could be the biggest.  It's unreal to see public vetting like this.  You NEVER see that.

Lets be honest here me and you and say honestly that your post lean very heavily to the left, agreed? even though you say you are balanced, agreed? why is this?

LOL how many of them are true?

[240 is Back]

Lets be honest here me and you and say honestly that your post lean very heavily to the left, agreed? even though you say you are balanced, agreed? why is this?

LOL how many of them are true?

there were a few weeks when HH6 and a few other folks started nonstop obama bashing threads.  I don't keep count.  I think if you ask me about any candidate, I'll give you my honest opinion.  Would jag admit all of obama's flaws and potential dangerous connections, and list them?  Would Coach admit Palin's shortcomings, and major impact of being associated with separist party?  No, I don't think so.

I'll readily admit both candidates suck.  I don't feel the need to count threads about either party that I start - I promise you that if tomorrow we find out Obama's wife spent 10 years in a separist party - and that she and Obama attended lots of meetings togheter - that a few crickts today would have something to say, as would I.

[tonymctones]

there were a few weeks when HH6 and a few other folks started nonstop obama bashing threads.  I don't keep count.  I think if you ask me about any candidate, I'll give you my honest opinion.  Would jag admit all of obama's flaws and potential dangerous connections, and list them?  Would Coach admit Palin's shortcomings, and major impact of being associated with separist party?  No, I don't think so.

I'll readily admit both candidates suck.  I don't feel the need to count threads about either party that I start - I promise you that if tomorrow we find out Obama's wife spent 10 years in a separist party - and that she and Obama attended lots of meetings togheter - that a few crickts today would have something to say, as would I.

I agree but none of those crickets tout they are balanced and dislike both candidate equally like you do...you dont keep count weill you should it would be pretty easy well at least to keep track of the anti obama threads you start. I dont think ive seen one since ive posted here that you started.

I dont mind you being anti mccain and pro obama, but im very much an honest person and a say what you mean and mean what you say person and it seems to me that you say one thing and do another. 

[Hugo Chavez]

Stop derailing threads tony.  You want to ask him about freaking gang signs or whatever, start a damn thread. Address the thread point or start a new fucking thread.

[tonymctones]

Stop derailing threads tony.  You want to ask him about freaking gang signs or whatever, start a damn thread. Address the thread point or start a new fucking thread.

i did and he wouldnt respond maybe you should worry about ppl making mindless and baseless accusations.

[Hugo Chavez]

i did and he wouldnt respond maybe you should worry about ppl making mindless and baseless accusations.

I don't care.  You can call him out in a new thread for not replying but don't do this shit.  You don't like it, go start some campaign to have me demoded but this is the way it is now.

[tonymctones]

I don't care.  You can call him out in a new thread for not replying but don't do this shit.  You don't like it, go start some campaign to have me demoded but this is the way it is now.

LOL alright next time this happens ill spam the shit outta the board with new threads until i get an answer...if thats what you want

actually i could do it right now with CQ if you would like?

[Hugo Chavez]

LOL alright next time this happens ill spam the shit outta the board with new threads until i get an answer...if thats what you want

actually i could do it right now with CQ if you would like?

no, you'll start one thread about it.  Identical news stories get merged, so will identical repeat threads.

[tonymctones]

no, you'll start one thread about it.  Identical news stories get merged, so will identical repeat threads.

I don't care.  You can call him out in a new thread for not replying but don't do this shit.  You don't like it, go start some campaign to have me demoded but this is the way it is now.

LOL OOOOKKKKKKK
Ill just start every new thread with why havent you replied to the last on then like you said i should do.

what about all the threads on palin today that covered the same topic which you refused to merge? one sided i would say

[240 is Back]

what about all the threads on palin today that covered the same topic which you refused to merge? one sided i would say

actually, if you look at them, those were all new stories on her.

we can't help it if 15 stories came out on her TODAY.  She's being vetted by the world, and it's huge.

[tonymctones]

actually, if you look at them, those were all new stories on her.

we can't help it if 15 stories came out on her TODAY.  She's being vetted by the world, and it's huge.

lol 240 not every thread was about a different topic there where overlaps and threads that got "DERAILED"  . into topics that other threads where covering.

[Hugo Chavez]

LOL OOOOKKKKKKK
Ill just start every new thread with why havent you replied to the last on then like you said i should do.

what about all the threads on palin today that covered the same topic which you refused to merge? one sided i would say

Identical stories get merged.  Idential issues don't get merged.  It's the established way of this forum from the start.  People can post on different aspects all they want without it being merged.  Do whatever you want with your titles, I don't care if you add something calling out 240 in your titles.  I don't care if you call out 240 several times as long as each time has a different political point for him or others to address.  Just do not derail threads to get your answer.

[tonymctones]

Identical stories get merged.  Idential issues don't get merged.  It's the established way of this forum from the start.  People can post on different aspects all they want without it being merged.  Do whatever you want with your titles, I don't care if you add something calling out 240 in your titles.  I don't care if you call out 240 several times as long as each time has a different political point for him or others to address.  Just do not derail threads to get your answer.

NVM i wont derail anymore not on purpose anyway but i will bump the other thread where im being ignored into oblivion, thats ok i assume right?

[240 is Back]

besides, the high volume means if a thread sucks, it's gone in 5 minutes.  And even just skimming the headlines on issues means you're better prepared when it breaks in the news 1 hour, 1 day, or 1 week later.

Or, in the case of John edwards affair, I posted it here 9 months before FOX news announced it

[tonymctones]

NVM i wont derail anymore not on purpose anyway but i will bump the other thread where im being ignored into oblivion, thats ok i assume right?

Is that ok huggy bear? i just want to be clear

besides, the high volume means if a thread sucks, it's gone in 5 minutes.  And even just skimming the headlines on issues means you're better prepared when it breaks in the news 1 hour, 1 day, or 1 week later.

Or, in the case of John edwards affair, I posted it here 9 months before FOX news announced it

LOL right but if another thread has coverd it then it doesnt need to be recovered apparently so maybe we should stop spamming the board all the same.

[Hugo Chavez]

Is that ok huggy bear? i just want to be clear
LOL right but if another thread has coverd it then it doesnt need to be recovered apparently so maybe we should stop spamming the board all the same.

of course it is.

[CQ]

LOL alright next time this happens ill spam the shit outta the board with new threads until i get an answer...if thats what you want

actually i could do it right now with CQ if you would like?

You have asked nothing under 20 times, denied my answers that included official links, act like your PC is unable to google etc.

Doesn't make sense replying to you in a rational manner, when I provide links to official sites with the audio and video and you tell that isn't good enough. Short of dragging folks to your door, there is nothing more I can do.

You've got some bug up your sleeve, so don't push that on me. You don't reply to me sensibly, so I won't bother trying to be sensible to you.

[tonymctones]

You have asked nothing under 20 times, denied my answers that included official links, act like your PC is unable to google etc.

Doesn't make sense replying to you in a rational manner, when I provide links to official sites with the audio and video and you tell that isn't good enough. Short of dragging folks to your door, there is nothing more I can do.

You've got some bug up your sleeve, so don't push that on me. You don't reply to me sensibly, so I won't bother trying to be sensible to you.

again what you did was give me a link with so many sermons on there it would take days to listen to them all and said prove me wrong, even though you have never heard the offensive phrases yourself only taking the word of the article you posted.

what sermons should i listen to?
have you listened to the sermons?
have you heard parts of the sermons that where paraphrased?

[tonymctones]

id be more than willing to listen to a specific sermon but im not going through hundreds of sermons that is what you should do, otherwise its just a rumor!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

again i dont think i ever denied you gave me the link only that the link doesnt necessarily help b/c you havent given what sermon to listen to.

So again have you listened to the sermons?
what sermons should i listen to?

answer me these questions and i will go listen to them.

[youandme]

I'd be more willing to bet that Jews are more afraid of Hussein B. than Palin.

[240 is Back]

I'd be more willing to bet that Jews are more afraid of Hussein B. than Palin.

so we're comparing which steaming pile of turd smells a little better.  Awesome!