« previous next »
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: Dorian 93 vs. Dorian 95.  (Read 2332 times)

Sherief Shalaby

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 10629
  • Team Nasser
Dorian 93 vs. Dorian 95.
« on: September 09, 2008, 05:46:37 AM »
Which was his best shape ever 93 or 95??..
Logged

Sherief Shalaby

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 10629
  • Team Nasser
Re: Dorian 93 vs. Dorian 95.
« Reply #1 on: September 09, 2008, 05:47:54 AM »
More..
Logged

RZA

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1165
Re: Dorian 93 vs. Dorian 95.
« Reply #2 on: September 09, 2008, 06:00:08 AM »
'93 was an overall best package then '95: smaller waist, better bi's. Think about it: Flex got second with a unique physique that would have won him the Sandow any other year then this one. But his conditioning was better in '95. As his body gave up, Dorian relied more and more on conditioning. And did it with success.
Logged

garebear

  • Time Out
  • Getbig V
  • *
  • Posts: 6491
  • Never question my instincts.
Re: Dorian 93 vs. Dorian 95.
« Reply #3 on: September 09, 2008, 06:00:31 AM »
you are an inquisitive young lad
Logged
G

suckmymuscle

  • Guest
Re: Dorian 93 vs. Dorian 95.
« Reply #4 on: September 09, 2008, 06:06:44 AM »
Quote from: Sherief Shalaby on September 09, 2008, 05:46:37 AM
Which was his best shape ever 93 or 95??..

  95'. He was fuller. In 93', he was a little flat...

SUCKMYMUSCLE
Logged

Sherief Shalaby

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 10629
  • Team Nasser
Re: Dorian 93 vs. Dorian 95.
« Reply #5 on: September 09, 2008, 06:10:44 AM »
Quote from: RZA on September 09, 2008, 06:00:08 AM
'93 was an overall best package then '95: smaller waist, better bi's. Think about it: Flex got second with a unique physique that would have won him the Sandow any other year then this one. But his conditioning was better in '95. As his body gave up, Dorian relied more and more on conditioning. And did it with success.

But in both contests his weight was nearly the same so if his condition was better in 1995 as you are saying, he must have carried more muscles than in 93.. What do you think??..
Logged

Sherief Shalaby

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 10629
  • Team Nasser
Re: Dorian 93 vs. Dorian 95.
« Reply #6 on: September 09, 2008, 06:13:29 AM »
Quote from: suckmymuscle on September 09, 2008, 06:06:44 AM
  95'. He was fuller. In 93', he was a little flat...

SUCKMYMUSCLE

But I believe his quads were a little bit sharper in 93.. I am not sure may be it's the effect of the lighting..
Logged

RZA

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1165
Re: Dorian 93 vs. Dorian 95.
« Reply #7 on: September 09, 2008, 06:15:31 AM »
Quote from: Sherief Shalaby on September 09, 2008, 06:10:44 AM
But in both contests his weight was nearly the same so if his condition was better in 1995 as you are saying, he must have carried more muscles than in 93.. What do you think??..

I'm not an expert but I do think it would be right. Dorian added mass after '93 but with the injuries his physique was not as well-balanced. I do think he carried more mass overall in '95. I still prefer his '93 physique: no weak points, outstanding back, tri's, excellent legs, unreal calves,etc.... And at the same time, the undisputed master of the mass/conditioning combo.
Logged

bodybuilder1234

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3749
  • Manny Pacquiao KO Floyd 1
Re: Dorian 93 vs. Dorian 95.
« Reply #8 on: September 09, 2008, 09:15:46 AM »
Good thread Sherief

his back looked bigger in 1995 but overrall Dorian 93 was superiour...

Better arms, shape and quads...
That said the lighting in the 95 Olympia was awful
Logged

The Wizard

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 648
  • Old School is THE School
Re: Dorian 93 vs. Dorian 95.
« Reply #9 on: September 09, 2008, 09:18:45 AM »
93 by a mile, by 95 he only had one arm!
Logged

England_1

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2132
Re: Dorian 93 vs. Dorian 95.
« Reply #10 on: September 09, 2008, 10:13:26 AM »
Dorian looks absolutely incredible in both those years. That front lat spread in 95 is unbelievable. I prefer 95 due to the insane condition.
Logged
Team Yates

_bruce_

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 23429
  • Sam Sesambröt Sulek
Re: Dorian 93 vs. Dorian 95.
« Reply #11 on: September 09, 2008, 10:18:30 AM »
Quote from: The Wizard on September 09, 2008, 09:18:45 AM
93 by a mile, by 95 he only had one arm!

+1
Logged
.

Sherief Shalaby

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 10629
  • Team Nasser
Re: Dorian 93 vs. Dorian 95.
« Reply #12 on: September 09, 2008, 10:23:54 AM »
Quote from: The Wizard on September 09, 2008, 09:18:45 AM
93 by a mile, by 95 he only had one arm!

You mean by 1995 he only had one arm and half... 1997 is the year where he really had one arm!!..
Logged

Fatpanda

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 9676
  • One getbigger to rule them all.
Re: Dorian 93 vs. Dorian 95.
« Reply #13 on: September 09, 2008, 10:25:48 AM »
93, as he had a tighter waist. 8)
Logged
175lbs by 31st July

Sherief Shalaby

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 10629
  • Team Nasser
Re: Dorian 93 vs. Dorian 95.
« Reply #14 on: September 09, 2008, 10:27:43 AM »
Quote from: bodybuilder1234 on September 09, 2008, 09:15:46 AM
Good thread Sherief

his back looked bigger in 1995 but overrall Dorian 93 was superiour...

Better arms, shape and quads...
That said the lighting in the 95 Olympia was awful

Thank you.. I agree with you in general.. But I have a strange feeling that in 93 his upper body carried a little bit more water than in 95 so his skin didn't look as thin as in 95.. On the other side his legs in 93 to me looked better!!..
Logged

Hulkster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22968
  • ND ran away from me
Re: Dorian 93 vs. Dorian 95.
« Reply #15 on: September 09, 2008, 01:42:04 PM »
93. that arm in the bi shot is horrible in 95.
Logged
Flower Boy Ran Away
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »