SUPREME BEING, I agree with your stance, muslim Pakis have ruined it for a lot of other brown skinned racial groups. Indians and Chinese certainly are sound from my experience.
But in regards to statistics you forgot to mention that in the UK the ratio of native babies born to non-native is 2:1 - I can assure you that a very large majory of the non-native babies born are of Paki origin. That's 1 in every 3 babies born. You seriously don't think that is a problem?
White's did what was necessary. Muslims invaded Europe, Chinese the Asian planes, Persians attempted to gain Greece - they're all guilty of WANTING TO DO IT. I'm not going to sit here berating my race because white Europeans were the only ones to do it successfully. Isn't it funny how documentaries "big-up" other civilizations empires... but when Britain ruled the world it's somehow negative, even tho we passed on our government style and formed success in those countries: US, Indian, Canada, Australia etc.
If it wasn't whites, it would have been someone else and I can assure you, whoever that someone else would have been it would have been A LOT WORSE. White European ideals are the most fare that have existed.
I understand what you are saying Nordic, i agree in the past every Country needed an empire, whites being the most successful in recent times. However, certain misconceptions with this fact that whites improved every Country they invaded, this is technically untrue - if you look at the empire, Whites did improve various Countries particular African Countries but they caused a mess in India.
India was very rich in terms of wealth, they had tea, natural abundance of raw materials, cloth, jewellery (even today 9 out of 10 diamonds come from India) and had vast kingdoms. Whites being superior in warfare and general democracy took control by the typical divide and conquer which worked rather well in a land rules by various kings and kingdoms. Maharajahs were told they would receive power if the were to help the invaders and hence a lot of the fighting in India was from Indian kingdoms fighting themselves.
I have looked at our history and i am really going into more depth into our occupation of India but i have too say we had more of a negative effect there. Sure we built the railroads but this was only to facilitate our own trade by taking resources and shipping them to London. Anyway i am digressing from the point here, i don't think the empire should be seen as a negative thing but i do also recognise the need for immigrants who are hungry and willing to work hard to provide a better future for their children. I cannot hate these immigrants coming in but some serious checks should be in place to recognise if they can bring value to this Country.
I understand your concern of ratio of native babies born to non-native is 2:1 but this is the price of globalisation. We have to take into account that many British also emigrate abroad to place like Australia and Spain should these also be viewed as scum?
A lot of people don't realise is this population concern of yours will die out - as other emerging nations keep growing e.g. India and China a lot of these newly arrived immigrants will go back for better opportunities.
Please remember most that arrive here will go back as soon as the opportunities dry up. Look at the Polish as an example, many have started to leave as back in Poland they are begging for workers for construction sites.
My solution to your problem is easy: 1. Vote Conservative and get rid of this socialist labour governments.
2. Make claiming unemployment benefit a lot of harder - makes these people struggle for not having a job.
3. Child support benefits - should be on a scale basis of number of children you have e.g. if not working and you have more than 2 children then you do not get child support for the 3rd child. We need to make it hard for single parents to survive without a job, not easier. When the Pakis realise they can no longer get by with having more than 2 children they will soon revert back to less children.
4. Any person seen inciting hatred should be deported - this needs radical law change.
5. Mosques should be monitored without complaint.
6. Government needs to give incentives and education for ethnic minorities in low income brackets to have less children - this means some sort of income tax allowance if they have less than 2 kids.
7. End all this bullshit about teaching Islam and religion in schools - religion has no place in schools.
My major point being that life with more children should be made a lot harder - i mean a damn lot harder, i have had enough of single parents boasting about the free flat the government has provided them. Once these people recognise they cannot lead a decent life with more children they will cut back.
Also, i am believer in free trade and globalisation as long as every race is hard working unlike Blacks and Pakis. I don't see integration as much of a problem - what is of more concern to me is the effect on Economies - i am an Economist and i am simply interested in higher living standard for myself. As developing Countries grow the world will be a richer place and in the next 50 years you may see a lot of migration from UK to places like India.
According to an August 2008 article in the Daily Mail, 3.7% of children born in England and Wales in 2005 where fully blooded (as apposed to mixed race) Pakistanis, meaning that by 2031 when the UK is expected to peak in population at 71 million,[4] there could be in excess of 2,630,000 British Pakistanis.
This means even in 2031 by the current statistic projections Pakistanis will still only make up 3.7% of the population. Sure that is an increase but nothing spectacular is it? Please take into account that as we integrate to globalisation we generally accepted that the cross section of the population would become more mixed. I don't think we have that much to worry about just yet Nordic.
