Author Topic: Lee priest at 21 (Read 9620 times)

Meso_z · « **on:** September 13, 2008, 10:42:42 AM »

Russian kid my ass.

check out this freak.

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #1 on:** September 13, 2008, 10:43:50 AM »

Quote from: Meso_z on September 13, 2008, 10:42:42 AM

Russian kid my ass.

check out this freak.

Super freak , best arms in the history of bodybuilding

Meso_z · « **Reply #2 on:** September 13, 2008, 10:46:36 AM »

22.... youngest pro ever?

RC Money · « **Reply #3 on:** September 13, 2008, 10:50:42 AM »

Quote from: NarcissisticDeity on September 13, 2008, 10:43:50 AM

Super freak , best arms in the history of bodybuilding

Agreed, with delts and forearms that match up. plus you never really heard rumors of lee having shit in his arms like flex and possibly kev, except from that gh15 tard who claimed with drugs alone lee would only have 17's lol.

Mars · « **Reply #4 on:** September 13, 2008, 10:51:10 AM »

local hero · « **Reply #5 on:** September 13, 2008, 10:57:46 AM »

probly one of the best jnr bodybuilders ever....... i think ian harrison turned pro at 21 too tho

GoneAway · « **Reply #6 on:** September 13, 2008, 10:58:58 AM »

Quote from: Meso_z on September 13, 2008, 10:46:36 AM

22.... youngest pro ever?

Almost.

Arnold was 20 when he won his pro card at the 1967 NABBA Mr. Universe.

Wiggs · « **Reply #7 on:** September 13, 2008, 11:04:00 AM »

Quote from: NarcissisticDeity on September 13, 2008, 10:43:50 AM

Super freak , best arms in the history of bodybuilding

You're smoking something. There's no way in hell his arms are the best.

Darrem Charles
Ronnie Coleman
Phil Heath
Arnold
Robbie Robinson

timfogarty · « **Reply #8 on:** September 13, 2008, 11:06:25 AM »

Quote from: GoneAway on September 13, 2008, 10:58:58 AM

Arnold was 20 when he won his pro card at the 1967 NABBA Mr. Universe.

that makes no sense. there are no "pro cards" in NABBA, and the IFBB hadn't started exclusive contracts yet to enter their pro events

and receiving a "pro card" is not the same as competing as a pro. Arnold first competed as a pro in 1968 at age 21

local hero · « **Reply #9 on:** September 13, 2008, 11:06:34 AM »

darrem charles doesnt belong on that list.... phill heath is all insulin, i'll give u the rest tho, not that there better, all top class and u cant say he doesnt belong with that group...

local hero · « **Reply #10 on:** September 13, 2008, 11:07:42 AM »

Quote from: timfogarty on September 13, 2008, 11:06:25 AM

that makes no sense. there are no pro cards in NABBA, and the IFBB hadn't started exclusive contracts yet to enter their pro events

#

they sure are bud,, theres a pro and amature universe that still runs to this day..

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #11 on:** September 13, 2008, 11:08:16 AM »

Quote from: Wiggs on September 13, 2008, 11:04:00 AM

You're smoking something. There's no way in hell his arms are the best.

Darrem Charles
Ronnie Coleman
Phil Heath
Arnold
Robbie Robinson

People are always , always glossing over biceps , triceps and FOREARMS not to mention a balance throughout the entire muscle group

while some may have better biceps , some better triceps as a whole NONE have more complete and better ARMS

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #12 on:** September 13, 2008, 11:10:49 AM »

spinnis · « **Reply #13 on:** September 13, 2008, 11:11:17 AM »

I wonder why in 10+ yrs he didn't get any bigger..

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #14 on:** September 13, 2008, 11:13:23 AM »

You need forearms to have the greatest arms

Wiggs · « **Reply #15 on:** September 13, 2008, 11:18:29 AM »

Dude...............no.

knny187 · « **Reply #16 on:** September 13, 2008, 11:23:59 AM »

Lee was the best youngest pro ever

RC Money · « **Reply #17 on:** September 13, 2008, 11:28:46 AM »

Quote from: NarcissisticDeity on September 13, 2008, 11:08:16 AM

People are always , always glossing over biceps , triceps and FOREARMS not to mention a balance throughout the entire muscle group

while some may have better biceps , some better triceps as a whole NONE have more complete and better ARMS

Yeah, maybe his bis werent peaked very well but his whole arm was thick, round, full, dense and hard.
phils dont look very dense, darrems tris are riped but not very big and his forearms suck. robbie was good but his would look lanky next to priest.
and i like big ron as much as the next guy and he had physicaly larger arms than priest, but for his height lees's were bigger and have never really varied from contest to contest as they are alway huge.

Team Diver · « **Reply #18 on:** September 13, 2008, 12:21:18 PM »

This Guy is brutal.

m8 · « **Reply #19 on:** September 13, 2008, 12:23:46 PM »

Being a midget really helped him in his bodybuilding career.

sculpture · « **Reply #20 on:** September 13, 2008, 12:46:54 PM »

Quote from: Wiggs on September 13, 2008, 11:04:00 AM

You're smoking something. There's no way in hell his arms are the best.

Darrem Charles
Ronnie Coleman
Phil Heath
Arnold
Robbie Robinson

Yes they are the best.

All the men you list are great but they have flaws:

Darrem charles - no forearms to speak of and high muscle attachments

Ronnie coleman - biceps overshadow triceps (although his detail is unmatched)

Phil Heath - almost as good, just not quite as good as lee's

Arnold - are you kidding me? Biceps completely disproportional to forearms and triceps. Probably the worst on your list.

Robbie - high forearm attachments, monster peak tho!

m8 · « **Reply #21 on:** September 13, 2008, 12:53:00 PM »

QuakerOats · « **Reply #22 on:** September 13, 2008, 12:56:07 PM »

Quote from: Mars on September 13, 2008, 10:51:10 AM

Lee always comes in shape.

sculpture · « **Reply #23 on:** September 13, 2008, 12:57:31 PM »

[img]

Meso_z · « **Reply #24 on:** September 13, 2008, 01:00:20 PM »

Quote from: m8 on September 13, 2008, 12:53:00 PM

Some of the best bb pics are shot with Lee. Very handsome in his early years.

Author Topic: Lee priest at 21 (Read 9620 times)

spinnis