Author Topic: SHOULD U START AT LOWEST BF POSSIBLE FOR STEROIDS  (Read 615 times)

Harley Buckshot

  • Time Out
  • Getbig III
  • *
  • Posts: 357
  • Dismembered and molested
SHOULD U START AT LOWEST BF POSSIBLE FOR STEROIDS
« on: September 14, 2008, 04:42:21 PM »
If u want to "bulk" and are a natural - is it smarter to start at 10% bodyfat than it would be 20%? WHy is this as wouldnt test burn that sumbitchn fat faster anyway as u gain lean mass

tbombz

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 19350
  • Psalms 150
Re: SHOULD U START AT LOWEST BF POSSIBLE FOR STEROIDS
« Reply #1 on: September 14, 2008, 04:43:30 PM »
First ...are you going to bulk naturally or on steroids? You didn't commit to either one.

dustin

  • Guest
Re: SHOULD U START AT LOWEST BF POSSIBLE FOR STEROIDS
« Reply #2 on: September 14, 2008, 06:09:37 PM »
If you're a fat sloth who can't control his diet then I wouldn't consider using steroids. Conversely, if you're skinny as a twig you probably don't have any business either. Generally speaking, that is...

I think people shouldn't be anymore than 12% bf before they should hop on the sauce because the more bodyfat, the more bloat. You don't want to take tons of anti-e's because estrogen is a great bulking agent. You want to have a nice buffer instead of struggling to look half decent. Nothing more embarrassing than taking steroids and looking like shit.