Yes. You are right.
But the tendency of now is extreme too.
How come tiny Darrem charse could kick his ass?
I understand that Melvin was good and he deserved to win the title.
But, Darrem beating Marcos was pure joke for me.
from what ive seen i cant see why darrem didnt win. sure he's smaller than the others but he holds his own in all the poses and shows a much more pleasing, balanced physique than them in certain others.
we've got to get back to the "best physique"...
yes, the best can be the biggest, but it could also be the smallest. this approach where a competitor gets awarded for muscle mass is completely missing the point.
you put mass on in certain areas to balance the package.
where there are several guys scoring the same on all other aspects, the biggest guy wins. ONLY THEN.
thats why for me, dex jackson is the best BB currently...perhaps ever. Levrone was best in his day. Labrada and Haney went neck and neck.
guys like flex wheeler, nasser, king, freeman etc dont rate in my book as they used implants, synthol or have glaring injuries. Thats why marcos to me shouldnt or cant win because he is lacking one calf- amongst other issues.
but hey, thats why we like GB.com everyone has an opinion, right?
