Author Topic: Lee Haney VS Flex Wheeler (Read 42287 times)

NarcissisticDeity · « **on:** September 19, 2008, 04:45:16 PM »

Okay hypothetical say Yates was never part of the equation , Lee Haney VS Flex Wheeler who wins? discuss

QuakerOats · « **Reply #1 on:** September 19, 2008, 04:47:06 PM »

Flex by a country mile, way better arms, legs and conditioning.

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #2 on:** September 19, 2008, 04:49:46 PM »

QuakerOats · « **Reply #3 on:** September 19, 2008, 04:50:41 PM »

Flex is the second greatest bb'er ever after Ronnie.

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #4 on:** September 19, 2008, 04:55:25 PM »

tleilaxutank · « **Reply #5 on:** September 19, 2008, 04:56:27 PM »

puhleaze

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #6 on:** September 19, 2008, 05:03:21 PM »

Pollux · « **Reply #7 on:** September 19, 2008, 05:19:00 PM »

Not to take anything away from Lee, but I'm going with my dawg, Flex Wheeler.

reppin203 · « **Reply #8 on:** September 19, 2008, 05:56:24 PM »

Quote from: QuakerOats on September 19, 2008, 04:50:41 PM

Flex is the second greatest bb'er ever after Ronnie.

Apples and oranges.

Pete Nice · « **Reply #9 on:** September 19, 2008, 06:07:03 PM »

Flex, hands down

JOHN MATRIX · « **Reply #10 on:** September 19, 2008, 06:18:30 PM »

Haney is better, flex was the posterchild for 'all drugs' and he put synthol in his bis and delts.
haney had superior torso, their legs were the same, flex had better arms but only post-synthol before they were the same.
haney had superior chest, back and lats.

m8 · « **Reply #11 on:** September 19, 2008, 06:23:38 PM »

Nice calves...

And yes, I vote Flex as he wasn't such a complete jeezus freak as Lee.

JOHN MATRIX · « **Reply #12 on:** September 19, 2008, 06:27:42 PM »

yes and flex had fake calves as well. piece of shit

bigkubby · « **Reply #13 on:** September 19, 2008, 06:40:52 PM »

ANOTHER STUPID ND THREAD TRYIN TO GET ATTENTION

Pollux · « **Reply #14 on:** September 19, 2008, 06:49:07 PM »

Quote from: bigkubby on September 19, 2008, 06:40:52 PM

ANOTHER STUPID ND THREAD TRYIN TO GET ATTENTION

It got yours. Even a reply, no?

Camel Jockey · « **Reply #15 on:** September 19, 2008, 07:12:19 PM »

Haney never resorted to cheating

JohnnyVegas · « **Reply #16 on:** September 19, 2008, 07:21:57 PM »

Quote from: Camel Jockey on September 19, 2008, 07:12:19 PM

Haney never resorted to cheating

I hear ya, Haney would never use steroids.

Camel Jockey · « **Reply #17 on:** September 19, 2008, 07:46:42 PM »

Quote from: JohnnyVegas on September 19, 2008, 07:21:57 PM

I hear ya, Haney would never use steroids.

Steroids = not cheating

Synthol, implants = cheating

suckmymuscle · « **Reply #18 on:** September 19, 2008, 08:37:00 PM »

Quote from: NarcissisticDeity on September 19, 2008, 04:45:16 PM

Okay hypothetical say Yates was never part of the equation , Lee Haney VS Flex Wheeler who wins? discuss

1991 Olympia Haney vs 1993 Olympia Wheeler? Haney.

SUCKMYMUSCLE

Relentless · « **Reply #19 on:** September 19, 2008, 08:49:06 PM »

Quote from: suckmymuscle on September 19, 2008, 08:37:00 PM

1991 Olympia Haney vs 1993 Olympia Wheeler? Haney.

SUCKMYMUSCLE

Wrong as usual! You're hopeless sucky. A straight-up fuckin' idiot.

KillerMonk · « **Reply #20 on:** September 19, 2008, 08:51:06 PM »

Lee for his amazing width,Flex for his incredible quad sweep.

Arnold and Flex are my alltime favourites, so Flex.

suckmymuscle · « **Reply #21 on:** September 19, 2008, 09:07:08 PM »

Quote from: Relentless on September 19, 2008, 08:49:06 PM

Wrong as usual! You're hopeless sucky. A straight-up fuckin' idiot.

Go gag on your step father's dick until your brain becomes even more damaged from oxygen deprivation than it already is, you inbred turd. You are single-handedly the greatest retard in this board. It is amazing noob. This is the gazillionth time you have written that I am an idiot and yet you haven't given a single reason for my Í'm wrong. You are just stupid and lack the capacity to formulate a single coherent argument, which is why you repeat the same shit over and over again.

SUCKMYMUSCLE

Master Blaster · « **Reply #22 on:** September 19, 2008, 09:12:50 PM »

Quote from: suckmymuscle on September 19, 2008, 09:07:08 PM

Go gag on your step father's dick until your brain becomes even more damaged from oxygen deprivation than it already is, you inbred turd. You are single-handedly the greatest retard in this board. It is amazing noob. This is the gazillionth time you have written that I am an idiot and yet you haven't given a single reason for my Í'm wrong. You are just stupid and lack the capacity to formulate a single coherent argument, which is why you repeat the same shit over and over again.

SUCKMYMUSCLE

No one's going to suck your muscle so stop asking you middle aged wind bag.

Relentless · « **Reply #23 on:** September 19, 2008, 09:33:45 PM »

Quote from: suckmymuscle on September 19, 2008, 09:07:08 PM

Go gag on your step father's dick until your brain becomes even more damaged from oxygen deprivation than it already is, you inbred turd. You are single-handedly the greatest retard in this board. It is amazing noob. This is the gazillionth time you have written that I am an idiot and yet you haven't given a single reason for my Í'm wrong. You are just stupid and lack the capacity to formulate a single coherent argument, which is why you repeat the same shit over and over again.

SUCKMYMUSCLE

You're wrong because you exist! Your name itself is a total abomination. Stop posting nonsense and I'll play nice...nah, fuck it. You aren't capable of posting anything worthwhile.

GoneAway · « **Reply #24 on:** September 19, 2008, 10:26:36 PM »

Quote from: snx on September 19, 2008, 06:26:56 PM

Hands down -- Haney.

Too much raw size for Flex to handle. His width would have exacerbated how narrow Flex was. Also, Flex's pecs were small, whereas Haney had a huge chest. And Haney's back dwarfed Flex's in width, and had equal detail. Plus, Haney's taper from the front was sick. Maybe the sickest ever (except for Buchannan).

Haney didn't have better back detail. Thicker, yes. More detailed, no.