« previous next »
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4   Go Down

Author Topic: Was Chick Top 10 Mr. O material?  (Read 5767 times)

knny187

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22005
Re: Was Chick Top 10 Mr. O material?
« Reply #50 on: September 21, 2008, 11:23:28 AM »
I stand corrected....

Bob would be considered top 10 Mr O material......












































if the Top 10 decided not to show up

 ;D
Logged

Forka

  • Getbig II
  • **
  • Posts: 144
  • My God is an Indian that turns into a wolf...
Re: Was Chick Top 10 Mr. O material?
« Reply #51 on: September 21, 2008, 11:38:21 AM »
I think Bob could have cracked the top 10...  But in order for him to secure a position that high, a few things would have had to happen. A few of the top guys would have had to come "off", or...  Bob would have to address his own physique deficiency's...

Personally, I believe his back shot was not his best, because his conditioning from the back wasn't on par with front shots, mainly his glutes and hamstrings...  Also, I think he could have managed to build up his quad sweep a bit more..and bring in more detail in back, specifically his lower back.  The great thing about Bob, is that he was very balanced, and very symmetrical... sometimes, that hurts you.. because it seems that the a tier 1 bodybuilder needs one or even two outstanding body parts. Example: Phil Heath's arms...  Dennis Wolf's Shoulders.....Jay's Quads...Ronnie's Back... 

Logged

Chick

  • The Pros
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 12899
  • sometimes you get the elevator, somtimes the shaft
Re: Was Chick Top 10 Mr. O material?
« Reply #52 on: September 21, 2008, 06:33:55 PM »
Quote from: Karl Kox on September 20, 2008, 11:42:42 PM

Wrong.  Bob got fucked that year and it was a hard line up

Final Standings After All Four Rounds
Place Name Country 1 2 3 4 Pnts
1 Ronnie Coleman USA 5 5 11 8 29
2 Kevin Levrone USA 15 11 5 7 38
3 Chris Cormier USA 10 14 18 17 59
4 Dexter Jackson USA 22 20 25 26 93
5 Gunter Schlierkamp Germany 51 28 17 17 113
6 Lee Priest Australia 42 29 28 28 127
7 Flex Wheeler USA 23 41 45  109
8 Markus Ruhl Germany 43 37 36  116
9 Orville Burke USA 37 37 55  129
10 Dennis James USA 37 50 44  131
11 Craig Titus USA 54 57 54  165
12 Art Atwood USA 64 64 58  186
13 Ahmad Haider Lebanon 68 69 65  202
14 Ernie Taylor England 75 63 69  207
15 Nasser El Sonbaty Yugoslavia 71 78 73  222
16 Darrem Charles Trinidad 80 76 80  236
17 King Kamali USA 69 91 80  240
18 Bob Cicherillo USA 94 86 80  260
19 George Farah USA 97 98 80  275
20 Francisco 'Paco' Bautista Spain 99 99 80  278
21 Claude Groulx Canada 101 102 80  283
22 Tommi Thorvildsen Norway 114 109 80  303
23 Jaroslav Horvath Slovakia 113 116 80  309
24 Gustavo Badell Puerto Rico 116 117 80  313
25 Don Youngblood USA 122 124 80  326
 
 




You know, whats funny about that Olympia was that I felt I brought a better package than I did at the SW Pro, and the NOC earlier in the year...where I beat Craig, Darrem, Melvin, Paul Dillett, and was 2nd to Markus...but never got a chance to be compared to them at the O...I honestly thought I could have been 9-12th.
Logged

monstercalves

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2325
  • Jesse James Dean Martin Lawrence Fishburne
Re: Was Chick Top 10 Mr. O material?
« Reply #53 on: September 21, 2008, 06:41:54 PM »
Quote from: Chick on September 21, 2008, 06:33:55 PM

You know, whats funny about that Olympia was that I felt I brought a better package than I did at the SW Pro, and the NOC earlier in the year...where I beat Craig, Darrem, Melvin, Paul Dillett, and was 2nd to Markus...but never got a chance to be compared to them at the O...I honestly thought I could have been 9-12th.

i didnt know u beat darrem ... shittttt u should have followed him to everyone of the 10k shows after that
Logged

titusisback

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5433
  • Team Ban Mom Lostabet
Re: Was Chick Top 10 Mr. O material?
« Reply #54 on: September 21, 2008, 06:58:43 PM »
There was someone on this board who liked to say "If "if's and but's" were candy and nuts"....

Nah, must be just my imagination :D
Logged

Jeffro

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3614
Re: Was Chick Top 10 Mr. O material?
« Reply #55 on: September 21, 2008, 07:43:50 PM »
Im not sure how dudes like Atwood, Ernie Taylor, washed-up Nasser, Kamali, or Haidar finish ahead of Chick in that contest. ???
Logged

Karl Kox

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6863
  • There's no Kayfabe in the business anymore.
Re: Was Chick Top 10 Mr. O material?
« Reply #56 on: September 21, 2008, 11:12:05 PM »
Quote from: Chick on September 21, 2008, 06:33:55 PM

You know, whats funny about that Olympia was that I felt I brought a better package than I did at the SW Pro, and the NOC earlier in the year...where I beat Craig, Darrem, Melvin, Paul Dillett, and was 2nd to Markus...but never got a chance to be compared to them at the O...I honestly thought I could have been 9-12th.



I think so as well.  is that the year the judges were way back from the stage ?
Logged

Chick

  • The Pros
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 12899
  • sometimes you get the elevator, somtimes the shaft
Re: Was Chick Top 10 Mr. O material?
« Reply #57 on: September 22, 2008, 08:04:48 AM »
Quote from: Karl Kox on September 21, 2008, 11:12:05 PM


I think so as well.  is that the year the judges were way back from the stage ?

55-60 feet to be exact...they were using the big screen to judge.

GOD I miss Wayne......! ::)
Logged

emn1964

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6079
  • Getbig!
Re: Was Chick Top 10 Mr. O material?
« Reply #58 on: September 22, 2008, 08:07:12 AM »
Quote from: Chick on September 22, 2008, 08:04:48 AM
55-60 feet to be exact...they were using the big screen to judge.

GOD I miss Wayne......! ::)

This is precisely why all the threads the re-hash contest placings using photographs are useless.  The body looks different, sometimes dramatically so, in real life and up close and in photographs or on video.
Logged

Chick

  • The Pros
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 12899
  • sometimes you get the elevator, somtimes the shaft
Re: Was Chick Top 10 Mr. O material?
« Reply #59 on: September 22, 2008, 08:20:51 AM »
Quote from: emn1964 on September 22, 2008, 08:07:12 AM
This is precisely why all the threads the re-hash contest placings using photographs are useless.  The body looks different, sometimes dramatically so, in real life and up close and in photographs or on video.

Exactly...
Logged

njflex

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 32171
  • HEY PAISAN
Re: Was Chick Top 10 Mr. O material?
« Reply #60 on: September 22, 2008, 08:51:48 AM »
Quote from: IFBBwannaB on September 20, 2008, 11:40:09 PM
It took Bob 20 years to get a pro card should I go on  ;)
Whenever this mentioned i always say ,look back at all those nat/usa lineups and pick how many pros beat him future pros in those lineups its scary.some that had great pro careers as well.he has/had a great build.matt menenhall and rory never turned pro he was in there era to start off with.
Logged

Chick

  • The Pros
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 12899
  • sometimes you get the elevator, somtimes the shaft
Re: Was Chick Top 10 Mr. O material?
« Reply #61 on: September 22, 2008, 09:19:19 AM »
Quote from: IFBBwannaB on September 20, 2008, 11:40:09 PM
It took Bob 20 years to get a pro card should I go on  ;)

Yes...please do, and explain where that is relevant.

BTW...it took me 13 years of competing, starting from 21...and Matt Mandenhall, Rory Leidelmyer, Edgar Fletcher NEVER get their pro cards.
Logged

polychronopolous

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 19041
Re: Was Chick Top 10 Mr. O material?
« Reply #62 on: September 22, 2008, 09:20:50 AM »
Quote from: njflex on September 22, 2008, 08:51:48 AM
Whenever this mentioned i always say ,look back at all those nat/usa lineups and pick how many pros beat him future pros in those lineups its scary.some that had great pro careers as well.he has/had a great build.matt menenhall and rory never turned pro he was in there era to start off with.
It really makes you wonder what made him have the drive to go on and keep competing... Say what you will about Bob Chicerillo, but the guy had alot of heart to keep going on after all those setbacks.
Logged

bodybuilder1234

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3749
  • Manny Pacquiao KO Floyd 1
Re: Was Chick Top 10 Mr. O material?
« Reply #63 on: September 22, 2008, 09:22:58 AM »
From what ive seen Bob was his best in the 2002 Olympia, and got 16th.
He deserved better than that but he "didnt yet pay his dues"
Logged

IFBBwannaB

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4538
  • BAN stick!
Re: Was Chick Top 10 Mr. O material?
« Reply #64 on: September 22, 2008, 10:22:58 AM »
Quote from: Chick on September 22, 2008, 09:19:19 AM
Yes...please do, and explain where that is relevant.

BTW...it took me 13 years of competing, starting from 21...and Matt Mandenhall, Rory Leidelmyer, Edgar Fletcher NEVER get their pro cards.

Well,

1.They didn't try as long as you, if they did you would have never got your chance.

2.Well you almost (or never, sorry I dont follow you) crack the top 10 so I guess it is relevant.

3.Who knows the same reasons that kept them from being pros probably would have kept them from breaking top 10.

4.Most top 10 guys get a pro card very early in their careers, especially the really good ones, look at Dorian/Flex/Kevin and more.
Logged

Chick

  • The Pros
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 12899
  • sometimes you get the elevator, somtimes the shaft
Re: Was Chick Top 10 Mr. O material?
« Reply #65 on: September 22, 2008, 10:34:04 AM »
Quote from: IFBBwannaB on September 22, 2008, 10:22:58 AM
Well,

1.They didn't try as long as you, if they did you would have never got your chance.

2.Well you almost (or never, sorry I dont follow you) crack the top 10 so I guess it is relevant.

3.Who knows the same reasons that kept them from being pros probably would have kept them from breaking top 10.

4.Most top 10 guys get a pro card very early in their careers, especially the really good ones, look at Dorian/Flex/Kevin and more.

1. Mendenhall- 9 years

   Leidelmyer- 13 years

   Fletcher- 10 years

2. Agreed, it's irrelevant

3. Who knows?

4. Actually...most don't, and certainly not in the last 10 years.
Logged

bigkid

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2774
Re: Was Chick Top 10 Mr. O material?
« Reply #66 on: September 22, 2008, 10:49:00 AM »
I remember thinking Bob got screwed in the 2002 O.  Kamali screwed something up and was way off his game and Bob nailed his conditoning pretty well, yet they placed right next to each other.
Logged

bigdarksnake

  • Getbig II
  • **
  • Posts: 166
Re: Was Chick Top 10 Mr. O material?
« Reply #67 on: September 22, 2008, 12:43:47 PM »
Bob ever consider a comeback? You'd wipe the floor with some of these guys...
Logged

QuakerOats

  • Time Out
  • Getbig V
  • *
  • Posts: 13621
  • bring amberlamps!!!
Re: Was Chick Top 10 Mr. O material?
« Reply #68 on: September 22, 2008, 12:45:55 PM »
it's ridiculous that a physique like Bob's didn't place higher at the big shows, the guy has it all, height, width, great conditioning, X frame, balance, very underrated.
Logged

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83434
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Was Chick Top 10 Mr. O material?
« Reply #69 on: September 22, 2008, 12:49:29 PM »
Quote from: bigkubby on September 19, 2008, 05:43:11 PM
IS IT TRUE THAT SHAWN RAY SAID THAT HE KNEW YOU WERENT TOP 10 MR OLYMPIA MATERIAL? PLEASE TELL ME IT AINT SO.

If King Kamali placed top 10 at an Olympia , Chick is definitely top-10 material
Logged

wes

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 71216
  • What Dire Mishap Has Befallen Thee
Re: Was Chick Top 10 Mr. O material?
« Reply #70 on: September 22, 2008, 01:07:07 PM »
Bob has/had a great physique......should have oftentimes placed much better than he did IMO.

I listed some of the guys who Bob competed against in a thread on the positive board......a list of great bodybuilders,all lengendary in their own way.

Some turned pro,some didn`t......botom line is Bob kept hanging and banging and did finally get his card against great opposition,just like a guy with heart is supposed to do....it`s called being a champion.

Why quit as so many others did when this is supposed to be your lifestyle?

Definately top ten material in the O.......just his small waist alone should put him ahead of a lot of the forerunners. :)
Logged

bigkubby

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2837
Re: Was Chick Top 10 Mr. O material?
« Reply #71 on: September 22, 2008, 02:46:19 PM »
HE DIDNT WIN SHIT THATS ALL THAT MATTERS BOB PROVE ME WRONG  :'( DID YOU FEEL YOU BROUGHT A BIG PACKAGE?  ;D
Logged
i

musclepug

  • Getbig II
  • **
  • Posts: 51
Re: Was Chick Top 10 Mr. O material?
« Reply #72 on: September 22, 2008, 04:32:53 PM »
No Fucking Chance !!!!! OMG !! Bob is nowhere near the top 10. Sorry Bob, just my opinion. But COME ON !!!
Logged

NaturalWonder83

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 11749
Re: Was Chick Top 10 Mr. O material?
« Reply #73 on: September 22, 2008, 04:39:51 PM »
bob looks fucking awessome in that pic-u never see vaccumm posses anymores-i would def say top 10 for sure-he keeps me motivated to become a bodybuilder-i hope to make it out to golds to train w/ him someday...
Logged
w

Karl Kox

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6863
  • There's no Kayfabe in the business anymore.
Re: Was Chick Top 10 Mr. O material?
« Reply #74 on: September 22, 2008, 06:15:18 PM »
Quote from: Chick on September 22, 2008, 08:04:48 AM
55-60 feet to be exact...they were using the big screen to judge.

GOD I miss Wayne......! ::)


That was very dunb.   

But hey the PDI worked for him ::)
Logged
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4   Go Up
« previous next »