Author Topic: Jay Cutler - should of won in 2001  (Read 3389 times)

FreedomFighter

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 823
Jay Cutler - should of won in 2001
« on: September 23, 2008, 07:16:15 PM »
guy's jay killed ron in 2001...

my question is if wolf kill's jay on friday will he became MR.O or will the judges as usual find there way around and fix things on sat?!

http://www.metacafe.com/watch/478302/ronnie_coleman_vs_jay_cutler_01_olympia_pre_judgin/

tendonitis

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4595
Re: best of cutler...
« Reply #1 on: September 23, 2008, 07:19:45 PM »
Ahhh yes the fridge's lost "victory" over Ronnie in 01.

Jay looked good from the front but Ronnie made him look like a child in all the back shots.

Jay failed the diuretic test, coming back positive for 5 different drugs.

If Jay ever really did get screwed out of a Sandow he sure as hell got paid back for it last year's debacle.

Voice of Doom

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3631
  • Everything is under control.
Re: best of cutler...
« Reply #2 on: September 23, 2008, 07:20:37 PM »
Coleman's gut is pathetic.  Perhaps if Jay had won then it would've signaled a real judging change for the decade. :-X

England_1

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2132
Re: best of cutler...
« Reply #3 on: September 23, 2008, 07:42:59 PM »
Ronnie was so fucking owned there. Jay was his best ever with not a single flaw. Watching that just confirms why Jay won the entire prejudging. Even when they are walking away you can see Jay's back is bigger and wider than Ron's. Shawn Ray looking pissed off as usual.
Team Yates

ahh.. fk

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 374
  • Greed is good
Re: best of cutler...
« Reply #4 on: September 23, 2008, 07:51:27 PM »
Ab and thigh was the end of Ronnie. I would give Ronnie back double bicep. Thats the only clear winner for ....EHhhhhhh BUUUuuuudYYYY

FreedomFighter

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 823
Re: best of cutler...
« Reply #5 on: September 23, 2008, 09:09:26 PM »
Ahhh yes the fridge's lost "victory" over Ronnie in 01.

Jay looked good from the front but Ronnie made him look like a child in all the back shots.

Jay failed the diuretic test, coming back positive for 5 different drugs.

If Jay ever really did get screwed out of a Sandow he sure as hell got paid back for it last year's debacle.

i agree...! but i still think it was so unfair. he was clear cut winner. although i'm not a fan of his physique

Hurricane Beef !

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4723
  • Beat Coach, Wes & Chaos So Bad . . .
Re: Jay Cutler - should of won in 2001
« Reply #6 on: September 23, 2008, 10:05:29 PM »
Someone, someone with a shred of credibility explain to The Beef ( body part by body part ) how Jay should have beeten Ronnie. Cause The Beef just don't see it.

The Beef

gcb

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2283
  • you suffer, why?
Re: Jay Cutler - should of won in 2001
« Reply #7 on: September 23, 2008, 10:11:06 PM »
Someone, someone with a shred of credibility explain to The Beef ( body part by body part ) how Jay should have beeten Ronnie. Cause The Beef just don't see it.

The Beef

I have to agree, ronnie was huge - only thing cutler had on him was gut and conditioning.

Wiggs

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 40808
  • Child of Y'srael
Re: Jay Cutler - should of won in 2001
« Reply #8 on: September 23, 2008, 10:23:29 PM »
I remember being at the show and have seen many videos and pics....

Jay was cleary at his best and his conditioning was better than Ronnie's.  The only pose Jay beat Ronnie in was abs and thigh. Ronnie still better because of the muscle he carried and how he carried it.  I think because Jay made so many improvments, it caused mass histeria and people were pissed that he didn't win it, kind of like Gunther and Wolf.  If you look back now you can see Ronnie is CLEARLY better.  The only thing I disagree on is the judges saying Ronnie came back during the posedown which is an unscored round.  Jay's best can't beat Ronnie's 95%.
7

England_1

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2132
Re: Jay Cutler - should of won in 2001
« Reply #9 on: September 23, 2008, 10:40:30 PM »
I remember being at the show and have seen many videos and pics....

Jay was cleary at his best and his conditioning was better than Ronnie's.  The only pose Jay beat Ronnie in was abs and thigh. Ronnie still better because of the muscle he carried and how he carried it.  I think because Jay made such a huge jump people were pissed that he didn't win it, kind of like Gunther and Wolf.  Ronnie was still king.  The only thing I disagree on is the judges saying Ronnie came back during the posedown which is an unscored round.  Jay's best can't beat Ronnie's 95%.

Jay won the entire prejudging. And the most important factor in a BB contest is condition, which you already conceded Jay was superior. Jay just flat out looked better, his physique, his tan (color), head to toe complete was his best ever. Ronnie lacked his good condition and normal thigh cuts.
Team Yates

NeoSeminole

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5589
  • Ronnie > Dorian
Re: Jay Cutler - should of won in 2001
« Reply #10 on: September 23, 2008, 11:09:20 PM »
Jay won the entire prejudging. And the most important factor in a BB contest is condition, which you already conceded Jay was superior. Jay just flat out looked better, his physique, his tan (color), head to toe complete was his best ever. Ronnie lacked his good condition and normal thigh cuts.

why the f*ck are you disagreeing with someone who was actually there?

England_1

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2132
Re: Jay Cutler - should of won in 2001
« Reply #11 on: September 23, 2008, 11:19:49 PM »
why the f*ck are you disagreeing with someone who was actually there?

That's just one person's opinion. You've denied first hand evidence supporting Yates for years now  ;) So STFU and take your own advice.

Jay won the entire prejudging aka he won Mr. Olympia.....Ronnie must have been servicing uncle Joe quite well back stage  :-X
Team Yates

affeman

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 15235
  • Rusty Trombone looks like an abortion in a thong
Re: Jay Cutler - should of won in 2001
« Reply #12 on: September 23, 2008, 11:24:37 PM »
guy's jay killed ron in 2001...

Yeah, he absolutely "KILLED" him.......lol ::)

England_1

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2132
Re: Jay Cutler - should of won in 2001
« Reply #13 on: September 23, 2008, 11:27:06 PM »
BB.com: So I guess you just have to live with that until next year. According to the judges, you beat Ronnie in the Muscularity and Symmetry round and he beat you in the posing rounds. So you had the better body, but he posed better? Shouldn't the best body win?



Ronnie winning the posing rounds...LMFAO
Team Yates

webcake

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 16148
  • Not now chief...
Re: Jay Cutler - should of won in 2001
« Reply #14 on: September 23, 2008, 11:27:33 PM »
Jay looked great, but Ronnie deserved the win.

I don't know why people go on about 2001 so much. Jay looked good, but Ronnie didn't look that bad.
No doubt about it...

johnny1

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2486
Re: Jay Cutler - should of won in 2001
« Reply #15 on: September 23, 2008, 11:49:25 PM »
Yeah, he absolutely "KILLED" him.......lol ::)
Thats quiet rare to see a shot of Jay with ripped glutes, Ronnie looks crazy in that back relaxed shot

TechnoViking

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4518
  • Too weird to live, too rare to die...----HST
Re: Jay Cutler - should of won in 2001
« Reply #16 on: September 24, 2008, 12:08:45 AM »
Jay should have won based on the fuck up by the judges...As good as Jay looked, Ronnie should have easily won the show...From the back it wasn't even close...But if i were Jay, i would have been upset...I just think during the show, the judges were to impressed by the change Jay made to his body(came in leaner then usual) but in the end, they did right by giving the nod to Ronnie...

Veteran_Lifter

  • Time Out
  • Getbig III
  • *
  • Posts: 385
  • haha
Re: Jay Cutler - should of won in 2001
« Reply #17 on: September 24, 2008, 12:10:09 AM »

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 79310
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Jay Cutler - should of won in 2001
« Reply #18 on: September 24, 2008, 01:07:44 AM »
why the f*ck are you disagreeing with someone who was actually there?

lmfao most ironic statement you ever typed.

FreedomFighter

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 823
Re: Jay Cutler - should of won in 2001
« Reply #19 on: September 24, 2008, 04:54:57 AM »
Yeah, he absolutely "KILLED" him.......lol ::)

cutler was not flexing there. it was clear on the clip- i believe after pre judging cutler was 6 ron 9 for the two rounds...
but that what i call knock out!

 


RC Money

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 972
  • I don't knock on doors...I knock doors down.
Re: Jay Cutler - should of won in 2001
« Reply #20 on: September 24, 2008, 05:19:22 AM »
Ronnie looked fine except the gut, he was huge and cut without being a mess of torn parts...there have been far less deserving Mr. O's.
And again look at the video of their back poses together, no contest Ron dominates and he might have been holding some water but his chest, delts and arms where still way more ripped than Jays...quads & abs was another story though but not enough to take the title in IMO and the judges.

monstercalves

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2325
  • Jesse James Dean Martin Lawrence Fishburne
Re: Jay Cutler - should of won in 2001
« Reply #21 on: September 24, 2008, 05:35:32 AM »
guy's jay killed ron in 2001...

my question is if wolf kill's jay on friday will he became MR.O or will the judges as usual find there way around and fix things on sat?!

http://www.metacafe.com/watch/478302/ronnie_coleman_vs_jay_cutler_01_olympia_pre_judgin/


when was the last time you read a book?

gymguy

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 757
  • Getbig!
Re: Jay Cutler - should of won in 2001
« Reply #22 on: September 24, 2008, 05:40:03 AM »
Not true.  Ronnie's back poses terminated Jay's chances of winning that year.

monstercalves

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2325
  • Jesse James Dean Martin Lawrence Fishburne
Re: Jay Cutler - should of won in 2001
« Reply #23 on: September 24, 2008, 05:43:45 AM »
Not true.  Ronnie's back poses terminated Jay's chances of winning that year.

yep this should be obvious ..... jays back has never been better...


im sure someone said that ...... bollocks

thats why ronnie won

NeoSeminole

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5589
  • Ronnie > Dorian
Re: Jay Cutler - should of won in 2001
« Reply #24 on: September 24, 2008, 06:13:46 AM »
That's just one person's opinion. You've denied first hand evidence supporting Yates for years now  So STFU and take your own advice.

oh yeah? Like what? ;)