Author Topic: Phil heath, LIGHTS OUT BABY  (Read 2753 times)

Boost

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4402
Phil heath, LIGHTS OUT BABY
« on: September 27, 2008, 09:34:34 AM »
 :P
Lets not get too carried away with Phil's physique

MAXX

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 16988
  • MAGA
Re: Phil heath, LIGHTS OUT BABY
« Reply #1 on: September 27, 2008, 09:36:11 AM »
Yeah but Ronnie is the best ever..

Phil is still the best on that stage today

Relentless

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2807
  • Kevin Levrone is the genetic ideal.
Re: Phil heath, LIGHTS OUT BABY
« Reply #2 on: September 27, 2008, 09:36:17 AM »
Please don't make it apparent to everyone that pro bodybuilding has gone into the gutter.  Comparisons like that are just too difficult to look at.

BAZZERKER

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 602
  • Getbig!
Re: Phil heath, LIGHTS OUT BABY
« Reply #3 on: September 27, 2008, 09:40:02 AM »
nobody will ever come close to coleman unless theres some teenage freak out there in the makes
I

m8

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 10794
Re: Phil heath, LIGHTS OUT BABY
« Reply #4 on: September 27, 2008, 09:41:09 AM »
If he wins, the "sport" is dead.

kyomu

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 16407
  • トホカミエミタメ ハラヒタマヒ キヨメタマフ
Re: Phil heath, LIGHTS OUT BABY
« Reply #5 on: September 27, 2008, 10:19:36 AM »
Yeah but Ronnie is the best ever..

Phil is still the best on that stage today
That Means still nobody has beaten the best Ronnie yet.

Meso_z

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 17954
Re: Phil heath, LIGHTS OUT BABY
« Reply #6 on: September 27, 2008, 10:21:43 AM »
:P
Lets not get too carried away with Phil's physique


2003 Ronnie will own Mr. Olympia competitors for ne next decades.

spinnis

  • Guest
Re: Phil heath, LIGHTS OUT BABY
« Reply #7 on: September 27, 2008, 10:23:22 AM »
put his arms next to eachother and they are vider then his latspread.

tweeter

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2180
Re: Phil heath, LIGHTS OUT BABY
« Reply #8 on: September 27, 2008, 10:24:25 AM »
Why don't you compare them in an abdominal/thigh. The pose you are showing is obviously the one that Ronnie is most dominant in.

kyomu

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 16407
  • トホカミエミタメ ハラヒタマヒ キヨメタマフ
Re: Phil heath, LIGHTS OUT BABY
« Reply #9 on: September 27, 2008, 10:27:05 AM »
Why don't you compare them in an abdominal/thigh. The pose you are showing is obviously the one that Ronnie is most dominant in.
Even Ronnie destroy thigh of Phil.
His only weak point is abs shape. Thats it.
And Ronnie beat Phil with the rest of whole body.

m8

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 10794
Re: Phil heath, LIGHTS OUT BABY
« Reply #10 on: September 27, 2008, 10:28:38 AM »
Even Ronnie destroy thigh of Phil.
His only weak point is abs shape. Thats it.
And Ronnie beat Phil with the rest of whole body.

People are saying Phil should win, how pathetic is that? ???
He has zero width, all he has is arms and the rest of him is amateur level at best.

tweeter

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2180
Re: Phil heath, LIGHTS OUT BABY
« Reply #11 on: September 27, 2008, 10:30:09 AM »
Even Ronnie destroy thigh of Phil.
His only weak point is abs shape. Thats it.
And Ronnie beat Phil with the rest of whole body.
I would still say that Phil wins the overall pose (ab/thigh). And Ronnie doesn't beat him on the rest of the body...calves, triceps on Heath are better.

divcom

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4211
  • The World South of the USA isnt for pussies.
Re: Phil heath, LIGHTS OUT BABY
« Reply #12 on: September 27, 2008, 11:14:59 AM »
Even Ronnie destroy thigh of Phil.
His only weak point is abs shape. Thats it.
And Ronnie beat Phil with the rest of whole body.

It really shows how weak bbing is at the moment with Ron, Kev, Shawn and Flex gone.  There is nothing dynamic about the current pros.  Melvin was never a consideration for top 6 against the likes of these guys.  How would an on target Lee Priest or Chris Cormier do against this lineup?  Would have to be Top 2-3 even at 5'4".
Oh...Monica!

kyomu

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 16407
  • トホカミエミタメ ハラヒタマヒ キヨメタマフ
Re: Phil heath, LIGHTS OUT BABY
« Reply #13 on: September 27, 2008, 11:18:49 AM »
I would still say that Phil wins the overall pose (ab/thigh). And Ronnie doesn't beat him on the rest of the body...calves, triceps on Heath are better.
Ok.only 3 bodyparts. But I notice now that Phil has only 4 packs in his abs also.

Disgusted

  • Expert
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 13610
Re: Phil heath, LIGHTS OUT BABY
« Reply #14 on: September 27, 2008, 11:19:14 AM »
Both these guys have similar structure.

divcom

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4211
  • The World South of the USA isnt for pussies.
Re: Phil heath, LIGHTS OUT BABY
« Reply #15 on: September 27, 2008, 11:19:41 AM »
I would still say that Phil wins the overall pose (ab/thigh). And Ronnie doesn't beat him on the rest of the body...calves, triceps on Heath are better.

Come on.  Phil gets clowned by Ronnie in top form anywhere around 1998-2003.  Phil would need 20lbs which will kill his narrow physique...just not to get Child Played by Big Ron Coleman.  How soon we forget?    
Oh...Monica!

Luke Wood

  • Pros
  • Getbig IV
  • *****
  • Posts: 1135
  • Getbig!
Re: Phil heath, LIGHTS OUT BABY
« Reply #16 on: September 27, 2008, 11:20:00 AM »
the body ronnie brought in 2003 will be unmatch for another 10 years

affeman

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 15274
  • Rusty Trombone looks like an abortion in a thong
Re: Phil heath, LIGHTS OUT BABY
« Reply #17 on: September 27, 2008, 11:21:04 AM »
:P
Lets not get too carried away with Phil's physique

Damn right. 8)












240 is Back

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 102387
  • Complete website for only $300- www.300website.com
Re: Phil heath, LIGHTS OUT BABY
« Reply #18 on: September 27, 2008, 11:21:39 AM »
the body ronnie brought in 2003 will be unmatch for another 10 100 years

Fixed!

Laura Lee

  • Competitors II
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 9954
Re: Phil heath, LIGHTS OUT BABY
« Reply #19 on: September 27, 2008, 11:25:22 AM »
:P
Lets not get too carried away with Phil's physique

Do they both have the same amount of years in training/competing, in this comparison?
:D Weee

Disgusted

  • Expert
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 13610
Re: Phil heath, LIGHTS OUT BABY
« Reply #20 on: September 27, 2008, 11:27:40 AM »
Do they both have the same amount of years in training/competing, in this comparison?

Doesn't matter, at this stage of the game it's all about drugs and genetics.

Laura Lee

  • Competitors II
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 9954
Re: Phil heath, LIGHTS OUT BABY
« Reply #21 on: September 27, 2008, 11:33:02 AM »
Doesn't matter, at this stage of the game it's all about drugs and genetics.
...and years of development and figuring out your body (strengths/weaknesses/fine tuning).  I'm surprised at you Disgusted, you know this.  ;)
:D Weee

Bobby

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5219
  • is da lordes plan
Re: Phil heath, LIGHTS OUT BABY
« Reply #22 on: September 27, 2008, 11:49:37 AM »
...and years of development and figuring out your body (strengths/weaknesses/fine tuning).  I'm surprised at you Disgusted, you know this.  ;)

maybe disgusted is implying that when the needles stop flowing the muscles stop growing?
tank u jesus

Army of One

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 30388
Re: Phil heath, LIGHTS OUT BABY
« Reply #23 on: September 27, 2008, 11:51:05 AM »
Doesn't matter, at this stage of the game it's all about drugs and genetics.

Bob Chic said drugs are just for "finishing touches", have we been mislead?

m8

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 10794
Re: Phil heath, LIGHTS OUT BABY
« Reply #24 on: September 27, 2008, 12:05:06 PM »