Author Topic: 2004 Condone Freddie Fannie Illegal Bookkeeping  (Read 2382 times)

The Coach

  • Guest
2004 Condone Freddie Fannie Illegal Bookkeeping
« on: September 29, 2008, 02:31:26 PM »
I've watched your BS videos, now watch this.





The Coach

  • Guest
Re: 2004 Condone Freddie Fannie Illegal Bookkeeping
« Reply #1 on: September 29, 2008, 09:08:37 PM »
Whats the matter libs? Is this the video your afraid to watch?

Bindare_Dundat

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 12227
  • KILL CENTRAL BANKS, BUY BITCOIN.
Re: 2004 Condone Freddie Fannie Illegal Bookkeeping
« Reply #2 on: September 29, 2008, 09:19:14 PM »
I don't know the whole story of Clintons comments at the end but it sounds pretty damning. However, it's pretty funny that one side is blaming the other when both are equally worthless when it comes to doing the right thing.

I wish B Frank would just eat himself to death already, what a uselss individual.

240 is Back

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 102396
  • Complete website for only $300- www.300website.com
Re: 2004 Condone Freddie Fannie Illegal Bookkeeping
« Reply #3 on: September 29, 2008, 09:24:35 PM »
Whats the matter libs? Is this the video your afraid to watch?

you get more hostile, the further mccain moves down in polls.

y19mike77

  • Getbig II
  • **
  • Posts: 251
Please comment
« Reply #4 on: September 30, 2008, 06:07:29 AM »

y19mike77

  • Getbig II
  • **
  • Posts: 251
Re: Please comment
« Reply #5 on: September 30, 2008, 08:37:34 AM »
still nothing, come on libs dont be scared!!

The Coach

  • Guest
Re: 2004 Condone Freddie Fannie Illegal Bookkeeping
« Reply #6 on: September 30, 2008, 08:42:09 AM »
2 responses? Unfreakingbelievable! Truth hurt?

y19mike77

  • Getbig II
  • **
  • Posts: 251
Re: 2004 Condone Freddie Fannie Illegal Bookkeeping
« Reply #7 on: September 30, 2008, 09:04:17 AM »
I posted the same video and have gotten nothing.

I can understand why tho. What could they say?

Its funny tho, they are so brainwashed they wont dare say anyting bad about there party lol.

y19mike77

  • Getbig II
  • **
  • Posts: 251
Re: Please comment
« Reply #8 on: September 30, 2008, 09:05:24 AM »
im waiting

240 is Back

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 102396
  • Complete website for only $300- www.300website.com
Re: 2004 Condone Freddie Fannie Illegal Bookkeeping
« Reply #9 on: September 30, 2008, 09:05:33 AM »
Frank and Schumer were bigtime involved.  Frank should recuse himself from this case.

That being said, mccain only got vocal in 2006 when he decided to run for president, and sure didn't pass any legislation to fix it.  I guess you can give repubs credit for bitching about it, but with 6 years of owning white house and congress, they didn't do shit to fix it.

y19mike77

  • Getbig II
  • **
  • Posts: 251
Re: 2004 Condone Freddie Fannie Illegal Bookkeeping
« Reply #10 on: September 30, 2008, 09:16:25 AM »
Both parties are to blame without doubt. Tho one more then the other.

They are all money stealing, lying, dirty rats. I wish there was a real third party to really shake things up.

Decker

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5782
Re: Please comment
« Reply #11 on: September 30, 2008, 09:22:56 AM »
See here's how it works.  Democrats start a program for home ownership by those on the fringes of such ownership.  The rightwingers inside the loop recognize a program they can exploit.  ASAP Bush's OCC preempts state oversight anti-predatory lending laws.  What do you know?  Bad mortgages flood the market.  So blame the gov. program.  Bubble Bursts and the bigshots still get paid while the little guy will get a goose egg.

Your clip does nothing to change the above.

Bush administration slams anti-predatory-lending bill

HR 3915 called threat to home ownership
By Inman News, Thursday, November 15, 2007.
 

 The Bush administration is opposed to most provisions of proposed legislation aimed at predatory lenders, saying they would result in greater uncertainty and increased litigation, worsening the credit crunch and ultimately reducing home ownership.

The mortgage lending industry also objects to many provisions of HR 3915, the Mortgage Reform and Anti-Predatory Lending Act of 2007, which was approved Nov. 6 by the House Financial Services Committee and is headed for a full House vote this week.

The bill's most controversial provisions include a ban on yield spread premiums, prohibitions on prepayment penalties on subprime loans, and the creation of limited "assignee liability" for companies that securitize loans for sale on the secondary market.

In a policy statement on HR 3915, administration officials said they favor simplified disclosures to borrowers, a greater focus on unfair and deceptive lending practices, and better training and oversight of loan originators.

Regulatory efforts "are already underway to address many of the issues raised by HR 3915," the Bush administration said in the statement. Those efforts include planned revisions to the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act (RESPA) to "substantially enhance mortgage disclosure" through standardized statements of loan terms and settlement costs.

The administration said it is also "encouraged" by the Federal Reserve's stated goal of improving disclosure requirements and developing new national standards for unfair and deceptive practices, under authority granted to the Fed by the Home Ownership and Equity Protection Act (HOEPA).

Provisions that "could overly constrict the primary and secondary markets for mortgage finance" include the bill’s specific underwriting standards, assignee liability provisions, and subjective obligations for mortgage originators," the policy statement said.

The Bush administration is concerned these and other provisions "could lead to greater uncertainty and increased litigation, which could cause an undesirable reduction in mortgage credit and a drop in future homeownership."

The statement stopped short of threatening a veto, but said the administration "looks forward to working with Congress to address its concerns as the process moves forward."

Although HR 3915 would require all mortgage originators to be licensed by either state or federal regulators, it would stop short of creating uniform national lending standards advocated by industry groups like the Mortgage Bankers Association.

As approved by the Financial Services Committee, the bill would create minimum standards, but leave the door open for states to keep or adopt their own, even stricter rules, for lenders not regulated at the federal level.

Echoing the Mortgage Bankers Association, the Bush administration said it supports national standards for mortgage originators that preempt state laws, in order to prevent the creation of "a patchwork of different legal regimes."

A consumer advocacy group, the Center for Responsible Lending, maintains that states should have the ability to make and enforce their own rules for lenders in order to respond quickly to new challenges. The group also supports many of the bill's other provisions, including a ban on yield spread premiums.

The Center for Responsible Lending, however, has criticized language in the bill that it claims would protect Wall Street investors who purchase mortgage-backed securities against lawsuits by aggrieved borrowers.

Copyright 2007 Inman News
All rights reserved. This article may not be used or reproduced in any manner whatsoever, in part or in whole, without written permission of Inman News. Use of this article without permission is a violation of federal copyright law.
http://www.inman.com/news/2007/11/4/bush-administration-slams-anti-predatory-lending-bill


How the feds stopped the states from averting the lending mess.
http://www.slate.com/id/2182709/

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 39449
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: 2004 Condone Freddie Fannie Illegal Bookkeeping
« Reply #12 on: September 30, 2008, 11:04:43 AM »
Frank and Schumer were bigtime involved.  Frank should recuse himself from this case.

That being said, mccain only got vocal in 2006 when he decided to run for president, and sure didn't pass any legislation to fix it.  I guess you can give repubs credit for bitching about it, but with 6 years of owning white house and congress, they didn't do shit to fix it.

McCain pushed for reform before 2006 and you know it.  Fanny and Freddy are owned by the liberals, including ZERO, who got more money from them in last three years than anyone else.



240 is Back

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 102396
  • Complete website for only $300- www.300website.com
Re: 2004 Condone Freddie Fannie Illegal Bookkeeping
« Reply #13 on: September 30, 2008, 11:45:41 AM »
McCain pushed for reform before 2006 and you know it. 

Can you list the legislation he introduced - before 2006, or EVER - to stop fanny/freddie abuses?

I can't find any.  Seems he made a few statements but didn't do a thing abuot it, even though he had a president and congress that would rubberstamp any repub bill.

Decker

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5782
Re: 2004 Condone Freddie Fannie Illegal Bookkeeping
« Reply #14 on: September 30, 2008, 11:49:00 AM »
http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?topic=238224.0

There were laws on the books that the Crooked Bush Administration pre-empted.

The collage of quotes in the video mean nothing without context.