Author Topic: Loch Ness Monster (Read 3227 times)

Cleanest Natural · « **on:** October 01, 2008, 12:18:28 PM »

Loch Ness Monster
Posted: August, 15, 2001
about Loch Ness..some people i’ve talked to from scotland think the Mts.surrounding the Loch have tunnels running from inside the Loch...but my question is why so many researchers that say "well i’m not sure how the loch ness monster could survive, there’s hardly any food source to sustain something that big"..stewart i believe there has to be an opening somewhere in Loch, that nobody knows about that allows nessie in..and with Sonar why can’t these scientists find any openings at bottom?
Stewart's Reply: You are correct. There is an opening at the deep end of Loch Ness that accesses the inner earth and underground oceans. Nessie usually is not in the Loch. The creatures generally stay underground and surface only while exploring. Scientists in the UK and the US know about the opening but do not release this to the public. There are similar openings under Lake Baikal in Siberia, Lake Champlain in NY/VT, and in Scandinavia.

Eisenherz · « **Reply #1 on:** October 01, 2008, 12:21:32 PM »

lovemonkey · « **Reply #2 on:** October 01, 2008, 12:21:57 PM »

The picture posted has been proven to be a fake. What is more plausible, that the loch ness monster is a leftover from the dinosaur era that continuously escape video cameras and sonars and is SO BIG that only a few "witnesses" of questionable integrity manage to see it? Or is it just possibly a hoax?

BlueDevil · « **Reply #3 on:** October 01, 2008, 12:24:10 PM »

Quote from: lovemonkey on October 01, 2008, 12:21:57 PM

The picture posted has been proven to be a fake. What is more plausible, that the loch ness monster is a leftover from the dinosaur era that continuously escape video cameras and sonars and is SO BIG that only a few "witnesses" of questionable integrity manage to see it? Or is it just possibly a hoax?

this is getbig ................ we believe

revolutionary stuff sev !

Eisenherz · « **Reply #4 on:** October 01, 2008, 12:28:51 PM »

Quote from: BlueDevil on October 01, 2008, 12:24:10 PM

this is ~~getbig~~ Dubai, India................ we believe

revolutionary stuff sev !

Parker · « **Reply #5 on:** October 01, 2008, 12:44:47 PM »

the Loch Ness Monster is fake, there is nothing there but big Sturgeon...that is Loch Ness...You'll find more evidence of dinos in the Congo than in Loch Ness Lake.

If they really wanted to find something, chum the water, then have sonar and Heat seeking devices (because in order for a large reptile to function in cold water, its going to have to be warmblooded), And there you go. And have Satellites take pics and heat signatures of the whole lake. Problem is that takes money.

Parker · « **Reply #6 on:** October 01, 2008, 12:48:41 PM »

the Loch Ness Monster is fake, there is nothing there but big Sturgeon...that is Loch Ness...You'll find more evidence of dinos in the Congo than in Loch Ness Lake.

If they really wanted to find something, chum the water, then have sonar and Heat seeking devices (because in order for a large reptile to function in cold water, its going to have to be warmblooded), And there you go. And have Satellites take pics and heat signatures of the whole lake. Problem is that takes money.

Meso_z · « **Reply #7 on:** October 01, 2008, 12:57:07 PM »

"Messie" is nothing more than a cow's shit floating around the lake.

Bobby · « **Reply #8 on:** October 01, 2008, 01:01:26 PM »

i don't want to swim there

Bluto · « **Reply #9 on:** October 01, 2008, 01:05:26 PM »

we already have one nutcase - theluke who search for bigfoot

we dont need another

dustin · « **Reply #10 on:** October 01, 2008, 01:06:07 PM »

Quote from: Parker on October 01, 2008, 12:48:41 PM

the Loch Ness Monster is fake, there is nothing there but big Sturgeon...that is Loch Ness...You'll find more evidence of dinos in the Congo than in Loch Ness Lake.

If they really wanted to find something, chum the water, then have sonar and Heat seeking devices (because in order for a large reptile to function in cold water, its going to have to be warmblooded), And there you go. And have Satellites take pics and heat signatures of the whole lake. Problem is that takes money.

I also believe that it's a sturgeon or just another large fish that may or may not be very common... there is no "Loch Ness Monster". There are still tons of exotic under water species that haven't been discovered... we've only explored a very small amount of the ocean for instance. But I don't think there's a huge Loch Ness or dinosaur type animal. The only monsters there are the drunken fools that melted down and exaggerated their claims after seeing a big fishy in the water.

Fatpanda · « **Reply #11 on:** October 01, 2008, 01:29:45 PM »

the loch ness monster is real, everyone in scotland knows this, but we actually do not talk about it to outsiders much, as we are a loving people, and do not wish to see the beast harmed by you inbred yanks, the same way you killed king kong

dustin · « **Reply #12 on:** October 01, 2008, 01:30:39 PM »

Quote from: Fatpanda on October 01, 2008, 01:29:45 PM

the loch ness monster is real, everyone in scotland knows this, but we actually do not talk about it to outsiders much, as we are a loving people, and do not wish to see the beast harmed by you inbred yanks, the same way you killed king kong

King Kong died for us bitches. May he PIP.

Bobby · « **Reply #13 on:** October 01, 2008, 01:43:04 PM »

let's hear gh15 on this

Fatpanda · « **Reply #14 on:** October 01, 2008, 01:44:39 PM »

Quote from: dustin on October 01, 2008, 01:30:39 PM

King Kong died for us bitches. May he PIP.

yes the king will be missed, rumour has it he was stronger than ronnie coleman

dustin · « **Reply #15 on:** October 01, 2008, 01:53:29 PM »

Quote from: Fatpanda on October 01, 2008, 01:44:39 PM

yes the king will be missed, rumour has it he was stronger than ronnie coleman

gh15 would say that King Kong would be nothing but a 4000lb weakling if he came off his naposim and several grams of testosterone.

theworm · « **Reply #16 on:** October 01, 2008, 01:59:24 PM »

that pic is actually from an elephant in a lake... look at it closer now...

wes mantooth · « **Reply #17 on:** October 01, 2008, 02:03:44 PM »

The photographer confessed, when he thought he was close to death, that it was a fake: it had been a toy submarine that he and a friend had rigged up as a hoax.

Fatpanda · « **Reply #18 on:** October 01, 2008, 02:07:44 PM »

Quote from: theworm on October 01, 2008, 01:59:24 PM

that pic is actually from an elephant in a lake... look at it closer now...

no, i can assure you it is king kong

STUPID WORM

Bluto · « **Reply #19 on:** October 01, 2008, 02:48:08 PM »

why does king kong have "december 14" written on his chest

Parker · « **Reply #20 on:** October 01, 2008, 02:58:33 PM »

Quote from: dustin on October 01, 2008, 01:06:07 PM

I also believe that it's a sturgeon or just another large fish that may or may not be very common... there is no "Loch Ness Monster". There are still tons of exotic under water species that haven't been discovered... we've only explored a very small amount of the ocean for instance. But I don't think there's a huge Loch Ness or dinosaur type animal. The only monsters there are the drunken fools that melted down and exaggerated their claims after seeing a big fishy in the water.

There is a underwater pic of what was believed to Nessie's fin, but it more resembles a Sturgeon's fin. And huge sturgeon have been found in that lake. As a matter of fact, someone thought they shot Nessie, because they saw the ridges atop the water, but a couple days later a body of a sturgeon washed ashore, with that bullet in it.

As I said before, a animal the size of elephant or bigger, that must climb out of the water, and swim, must be warm blooded, especially to exist in such cold water and be a reptile. There has to be a group in order to breed.