Author Topic: Analysis: Palin's words may backfire on McCain  (Read 2535 times)

divcom

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4211
  • The World South of the USA isnt for pussies.
Analysis: Palin's words may backfire on McCain
« on: October 05, 2008, 10:27:38 AM »
This stuff is getting old with the election 1 mth away.  She just doesnt understand the job and the world at large.  I dont blame her.  F##k McCain.  She needs to go back to her family and her job in Alaska. 

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20081005/ap_on_el_pr/palin_s_words_analysis



this was the guy the Repubs and McCain wanted and he skipped on the brown man vs brown man circus it would have become.  good for him.

if you aint voting for "changing"...then at least for something to possibly happen.
 
Oh...Monica!

affy

  • Guest
Re: Analysis: Palin's words may backfire on McCain
« Reply #1 on: October 05, 2008, 10:32:02 AM »
Didn't Jindal say he didn't want to be VP just yet...something along the lines of "im not ready yet". 

Honestly if he was McCains pick, the republicans would have probably been ahead.  Very smart guy.

Benny B

  • Time Out
  • Getbig V
  • *
  • Posts: 12405
  • Ron = 'Princess L' & many other gimmicks - FACT!
Re: Analysis: Palin's words may backfire on McCain
« Reply #2 on: October 05, 2008, 10:35:39 AM »
McCain wanted Lieberman, gentleman. The repube party establishment told him that Joe was unacceptable.
!

divcom

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4211
  • The World South of the USA isnt for pussies.
Re: Analysis: Palin's words may backfire on McCain
« Reply #3 on: October 05, 2008, 10:37:05 AM »
Didn't Jindal say he didn't want to be VP just yet...something along the lines of "im not ready yet". 

Honestly if he was McCains pick, the republicans would have probably been ahead.  Very smart guy.

like colin powell why would he be vp when has the skills to run the show in 8yrs after he completes his 2 terms in louisiana?  good move not to be mccain toy like palin.
Oh...Monica!

divcom

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4211
  • The World South of the USA isnt for pussies.
Re: Analysis: Palin's words may backfire on McCain
« Reply #4 on: October 05, 2008, 10:40:01 AM »
McCain wanted Lieberman, gentleman. The repube party establishment told him that Joe was unacceptable.

yeah...media always gives the correct story in the usa.  bobby was the top dog for the spot when obama made it through on the other side.  bobby is a far superior counter punch to obama than palin.  listen to anything they feed you.  this isnt a hard one.
Oh...Monica!

240 is Back

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 102387
  • Complete website for only $300- www.300website.com
Re: Analysis: Palin's words may backfire on McCain
« Reply #5 on: October 05, 2008, 10:40:38 AM »
Jindal is smart enough to know he's a viable Presidential candidate in 2016.  Obama will have destoryed the color barrier and Jindal is seriously the smartest 36-year old I've ever heard speak.

JOHN MATRIX

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 13281
  • the Media is the Problem
Re: Analysis: Palin's words may backfire on McCain
« Reply #6 on: October 05, 2008, 10:48:19 AM »
its funny how the only 'connection' they have is serving on the same board of a fuckin CHARITY ::) oh and they supposedly live in the same area ::)

oh and obama was 8 YEARS OLD when this guy was involved in anything shady

240 is Back

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 102387
  • Complete website for only $300- www.300website.com
Re: Analysis: Palin's words may backfire on McCain
« Reply #7 on: October 05, 2008, 10:51:01 AM »
Let's face it - we're a country in financial crisis and two quagmire wars.

McCain says he'll bring change, but also endorses the Bush economic and military positions.  There is NO WAY to bring change when keeping the same policy.

People are tired of the economy being bad, and they're tired of pumping $3,000,000,000 per WEEK into that shitbag country Iraq for a war they don't want, and our population doesn't want.  As Palin reiterated in the debate - Obama wants to leave Iraq, and Mccain does not.

Would $3 billion per week staying in the US economy be a good thing?  You tell me.

The Coach

  • Guest
Re: Analysis: Palin's words may backfire on McCain
« Reply #8 on: October 05, 2008, 11:17:22 AM »
Let's face it - we're a country in financial crisis and two quagmire wars.

McCain says he'll bring change, but also endorses the Bush economic and military positions.  There is NO WAY to bring change when keeping the same policy.

People are tired of the economy being bad, and they're tired of pumping $3,000,000,000 per WEEK into that shitbag country Iraq for a war they don't want, and our population doesn't want.  As Palin reiterated in the debate - Obama wants to leave Iraq, and Mccain does not.

Would $3 billion per week staying in the US economy be a good thing?  You tell me.

Isn't funny that the financial shit started hitting the fan after the dems won the senant a couple of years ago?

divcom

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4211
  • The World South of the USA isnt for pussies.
Re: Analysis: Palin's words may backfire on McCain
« Reply #9 on: October 05, 2008, 11:21:32 AM »
Isn't funny that the financial shit started hitting the fan after the dems won the senant a couple of years ago?

isnt it funny we hit an all-time def during the troll's run in office? dems arent running the banks and airlines.  good one though.  i'm surprised they havent tried to run that one on tv.  what we do know is the troll at the top be asking for s##tloads of money for his daddy's war.  we got those wmd yet.
Oh...Monica!

240 is Back

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 102387
  • Complete website for only $300- www.300website.com
Re: Analysis: Palin's words may backfire on McCain
« Reply #10 on: October 05, 2008, 11:24:50 AM »
Isn't funny that the financial shit started hitting the fan after the dems won the senant a couple of years ago?

Bush borrowed a shitload of money from 01 to 06 when he controlled everything.

yes, the house of cards started falling in 2007.  You can blame that to the limpdick dems, or to the two elective wars bush started.

The economic stimulus check was supposed to pause this recession so it happened on someone else's watch.  Bush wants to limp out of office so every bad thing obama or mccain faces in Jan 2009 are their fault, not his.

Zach Trowbridge

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1732
Re: Analysis: Palin's words may backfire on McCain
« Reply #11 on: October 05, 2008, 11:26:52 AM »
Isn't funny that the financial shit started hitting the fan after the dems won the senant a couple of years ago?

Financial shit hit the fan when the "adjustable" part of "adjustable rate mortgage" became a reality.  Partisanship has fuck-all to do with it.  Jesus christ, man, you seem like a good guy, but drop the fucking "red vs blue" tunnel vision.

JOHN MATRIX

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 13281
  • the Media is the Problem
Re: Analysis: Palin's words may backfire on McCain
« Reply #12 on: October 05, 2008, 11:31:28 AM »
reagan: huge debt
bush 1: huge debt
clinton: huge surplus, thriving economy
bush 2: record debt, disasters all around

and these republican fanboys are worried about obama's spending/economic priciples ::)

divcom

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4211
  • The World South of the USA isnt for pussies.
Re: Analysis: Palin's words may backfire on McCain
« Reply #13 on: October 05, 2008, 12:04:57 PM »
reagan: huge debt
bush 1: huge debt
clinton: huge surplus, thriving economy
bush 2: record debt, disasters all around

and these republican fanboys are worried about obama's spending/economic priciples ::)

mccain: dont know financials and cant count, pass away in offce
palin: new president will financial flip cards, you figure the rest.
Oh...Monica!

Busted

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2178
  • PROUD MEMBER OF TEAM MOWER
Re: Analysis: Palin's words may backfire on McCain
« Reply #14 on: October 05, 2008, 12:17:01 PM »
Isn't funny that the financial shit started hitting the fan after the dems won the senant a couple of years ago?

And as the Majority in the senate they still cant pass anything in less they got 66 votes... if they try passing a bill witha1/49 vote Bush Vetos it, and they dont get any support from the GOP to over rule him.

When the GOP was the majority they got 51 votes and Bush signed it into law...

Coach do you understand how gov works at all???  Every day you show me more and more you learn about gov through Rush Limbough, which I could debate him on how gov works...

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41760
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: Analysis: Palin's words may backfire on McCain
« Reply #15 on: October 05, 2008, 01:37:00 PM »
its funny how the only 'connection' they have is serving on the same board of a fuckin CHARITY ::) oh and they supposedly live in the same area ::)

oh and obama was 8 YEARS OLD when this guy was involved in anything shady

Nonsense.  Obama started his political career in Ayeres' home.  Ayeres and Obama also served together on the Annenburg foundation and still to this day refuse to release any info on how millions of dollars of grants and gifts were distributed.  Ayeres admitted in a staory on 9/11/01 that his only regret was not doing more harm in the weather underground bombings, one of which resulted in a police officer dying.

Using your anaology is also garbage since lets say forty years from now you become friends with Osama Bin Laden.  When someone says to you that Bin laden was a terrorist, are you going to say well that was forty years ago???? 

It just goes to show you the type of people Obama likes to comiserate with.  Rev. Wright, Rezko, etc etc.
The followers of the false messiah will explain away anything and everything that contradict this false story they built up about this empty suit.

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41760
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: Analysis: Palin's words may backfire on McCain
« Reply #16 on: October 05, 2008, 01:53:17 PM »
Financial shit hit the fan when the "adjustable" part of "adjustable rate mortgage" became a reality.  Partisanship has fuck-all to do with it.  Jesus christ, man, you seem like a good guy, but drop the fucking "red vs blue" tunnel vision.

The fact of the matter is that blaming bush is just silly. 

Here is how this went down and i dare anyone to contradict me with facts:

1.  Fanny and Freddy pushed for more home ownership by poor people who could not qualifiy due to poor credit scores and no down payment.  This is clear and obvious to any thinking person. 

To do this, they lowered the requirements of traditional mortgages and also endorsed new loan products like sub-prime and different types of arm type loans.

2.  Realtors steered people into expensive homes they knew the people could not afford and sold them on a monthly payment versus the actual cost over time, etc.

3.  Mortgage brokers submitted phony and doctored applications containing bogus income amounts, assets, etc.  They often used the fact that many applicants had poor credit to push them into subprime loans and riskier loans because they would be paid more and that was the only type of loan available to these people.  Many of these fools did not understand what they were signing up for, but are still to blame for not asking enough questions.

4.  The mortgage brokers steered these loans to appraisers they knew would come back with a high appraisal, often times justifying the 100% or 100/5 financing for the property.

5.  At the closing, not only did the mortgage brokers charge upfront points, but got paid on the back end thousands of additional dollars from the banks to make these loans.  Many of you have no idea how much mortgage brokers made off of these loans.  These brokers were paid everything upfront and had no risk of losing their commisions if the loans went into default.

6.  The banks who actually wrote these loans did not keep them long and often sold them to other banks.  These banks did not due any due diligence on these applicants since they relied on the docs submitted by the mortgage brokers.  It only got worse as these loans were sold and re sold.

7.  Many of these loans were iin good standing while the teaser rates were still in effect and the arms did not reset.  Thus, they were classified as good loans and marketed to other banks as such before they reset.

8.  The banks often bundled these loans into mega products while they were in good standing and sold them to each other not realizing that they were buying garbage that would be a ticking time bomb.  These banks also did not realize that many of these loans were only in good standing because the arms did not reset and mortgages typically dont go into default in the first year.

9.  The banks, when trying to realize what happened, realized that they bought nothing in reality and that the actual house and property secured by the mortgage were basically not worth nearly the paper it was written on due to fake appraisals, etc etc.

10.  Many of these subprime loans were to illegal aliens, flippers, scam artists, and phantoms who are untraceable and have no assets to sieze.

11.  Other than blame themselves for their failure to do due diligence, they are seeking the taxpayer to bail them out.

The Democrats are certainly to blame to helping push this whole disaster in motion, but there are many other responsible parties as well, including what I listed above. 

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41760
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: Analysis: Palin's words may backfire on McCain
« Reply #17 on: October 05, 2008, 01:54:39 PM »
reagan: huge debt
bush 1: huge debt
clinton: huge surplus, thriving economy
bush 2: record debt, disasters all around

and these republican fanboys are worried about obama's spending/economic priciples ::)

I see your 8th grade education is really paying off.

dov

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3469
Re: Analysis: Palin's words may backfire on McCain
« Reply #18 on: October 05, 2008, 01:55:31 PM »
Poor John McCain took a beating during the VP debate and he was'nt even there! Biden disected McCain's agenda and exposed the fact that Palin was incapable of defending her running mate. Biden HAMMERED the Exxon tax break and she never once rebuttled. Biden HAMMERED the fact that McCain has NO EXIT strategy for Iraq and he also made her look like a fool when she described her big plans for "running the senate" as the VP!!!HAHA...she looked "coached" and this was a classic example of teacher(Biden) vs. student(Palin)...at times during the debate I actually felt sorry for her..she looked so uncomfortable and she jumbled more words than expected. She should really stop trying to smile so much when talking..it's very annoying and I think it breaks her concentration...only Mary Hart (Entertainment Tonight) could smile and talk at the same time!
Also, the fact that she accepts the bible literally is FRIGHTENING!!!!!
She actually believes everything happened as described! She will look you in the eye and say that a particular person walked on water! Holy SHIT..I don't want ANYONE that close to executive powers at a national level who believes this shit! Oh wait, "W" has the EXACT same "beliefs"! HAHA..
I also laughed histerically at her answer to same sex benefits. She says that she's "tolerant" of homosexuals receiving equal rights..."tolerant"- as though she's doing them a favor by being "tolerant"....Jesus christ, she's the poster child for being raised in the church of a small town and brainwashed at an early age. I don't think she's capable of an original thought! I was also brainwashed as a child: I believed in Santa Claus until I was capable of RATIONAL thinking at age 12!