If you vote for McCain you ar a racist.. Video

[Busted]

Quality Americans here like Coach

[marcus]

[spach23]

This video from the Stern show just goes to show that there are just as many black racists as there are white ones. These fucking idiots don't even know who his VP is gonna be. I guarantee if his VP were black they would know.

[slaveboy1980]

if you want to become the president of usa you have to be or become a racist

[JasonBourne22]

This video from the Stern show just goes to show that there are just as many black racists as there are white ones. These fucking idiots don't even know who his VP is gonna be. I guarantee if his VP were black they would know.

Great post. There are probably a lot of black racists that probably have no idea or understand what obama is speaking for in his campaign but will vote for him anyway.

[The Ugly]

People who are Liberal: Educated, Common Sense, Work Smart, friendly to all races etc..

Catch my drift?

[Soul Crusher]

Quality Americans here like Coach

Im not voting for Obama because:

1.  Marxist alliances.
2.  Wants to raise taxes.
3.  Acorn
4.  Wants to sit with Iran, Cuba, and Chavez

It has nothing to do with race and everything to do with the fact that he is a marxist radical who thinks he is robin hood.

[The True Adonis]

Im not voting for Obama because:

1.  Marxist alliances.
2.  Wants to raise taxes.
3.  Acorn
4.  Wants to sit with Iran, Cuba, and Chavez

It has nothing to do with race and everything to do with the fact that he is a marxist radical who thinks he is robin hood.

1. Prove it.  False Insinuation based on nothing.
2. Americans who make over a quarter million dollars a year(1-5 percent of all Americans) will see a slight increase of about 3 percent which was the tax policy under Bill Clinton. You sir, DO NOT make 250,000 dollars a year and would benefit MORE with Obama`s tax plan.
3. McCain was for Acorn and has supported it.   http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story/acorn-mccain-have-you-lost/story.aspx?guid=%7B9DF1C9E0-F0BA-4509-B4EC-AF741171DEAC%7D&dist=hppr
4.North Korea has just been taken off the Terror Watch list, Threat list and "enemy list". This is because of direct and engaging diplomacy via talks.  President Bush should be commended for this as well as his present effort for talking with Iran.  Diplomacy works.

[liberalismo]

Im not voting for Obama because:

1.  Marxist alliances.
2.  Wants to raise taxes.
3.  Acorn
4.  Wants to sit with Iran, Cuba, and Chavez

It has nothing to do with race and everything to do with the fact that he is a marxist radical who thinks he is robin hood.

1. None.
2. He wants to cut taxes for more people than McCain does.
3. No real affiliation.
4. Fantastic. So would Reagan.

[Mars]

4.  Wants to sit with Iran, Cuba, and Chavez

The question is if these courageous men will sit on a table together with the next usa president.

[JOHN MATRIX]

Quality Americans here like Coach

machine gun these scum and make america a better place

[The Coach]

Yes Busted...quality americans. From our elected officials and self-proclaimed "leaders".




Wednesday, October 15, 2008 4:00 PM

 Article Font Size   
 



PITTSBURGH — U.S. Rep. John Murtha says his home base of western Pennsylvania is racist and that could reduce Barack Obama's victory margin in the state by 4 percentage points.


The 17-term Democratic congressman tells the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette in a story posted Wednesday on its Web site that, as he put it: "There is no question that western Pennsylvania is a racist area."


He says it's taken time for many Pennsylvania voters to come around to liking Obama, but he should still win the state, though not in a runaway.


In a separate interview posted Wednesday on the Pittsburgh Tribune-Review's Web site, Murtha says Obama has a problem with the race issue in western Pennsylvania that could shave 4 points off his lead in the state.







© 2008 Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
 

 




Jesse Jackson: Obama Will 'Ignore Zionists'

Wednesday, October 15, 2008 12:58 PM

By: Tim Collie  Article Font Size   
 


Jesse Jackson is back, and that may not be good news for Barack Obama.

The Chicago-based civil rights leader made the front pages of Israeli newspapers today after he told an interviewer that Obama’s presidency will remove the clout of “Zionists who have controlled American policy for decades.”

The comments, contained in a New York Post column Tuesday, drew immediate rebuke from some Jewish groups and the Obama campaign. Appearing at an event hosted by the World Policy Forum in Evian, France, Jackson said that an Obama administration will shake things up in the Middle East.

“Decades of putting Israel's interests first” would end, said Jackson, who stressed he was only speaking as a supporter of Obama, not the campaign. “Obama is about change. And the change that Obama promises is not limited to what we do in America itself. It is a change of the way America looks at the world and its place in it.”

That apparently didn’t sit well with the candidate, who right now is worried a bit more about his place in the upcoming election. Obama’s supporters are mobilizing to reassure elderly Jews, who are concerned about his Muslim ties and his previous statements supporting Palestinian rights, that the Democrat will remain a strong supporter of Israel. American Jews, an overwhelmingly Democratic constituency, are a key demographic in Florida, a battleground state.

“Rev. Jesse Jackson Sr. is not an adviser to the Obama campaign and is therefore in no position to interpret or share Barack Obama's views on Israel and foreign policy,” Obama national security spokeswoman Wendy Morigi said in a statement dismissing Jackson’s “false charges.”

“As he has made clear throughout his career and throughout this campaign, Barack Obama has a fundamental commitment to a strong U.S.-Israel relationship,’’ the statement said. “As president, he will ensure that Israel can defend itself from every threat it faces, stand with Israel in its quest for a secure peace with its neighbors and use all elements of American power to end Iran's illicit nuclear program."

Regarding the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, Jackson said that President George W. Bush “was so afraid of a snafu and of upsetting Israel that he gave the whole thing a miss. Barack will change that," because, as long as the Palestinians haven't seen justice, the Middle East will “remain a source of danger to us all.”

The American Jewish Committee (AJC) immediately condemned Jackson's remarks.

“Rev. Jackson's remarks, which appeared in an interview with the journalist Amir Taheri in today's New York Post, echo classic anti-Semitic conspiracy theories about Jewish power,” AJC Executive Director David A. Harris told The Jerusalem Post. “This statement, regrettably, is not the first troubling comment by Rev. Jackson regarding Israel, Zionism and the Jewish people.”

“As poll after poll has revealed, over a span of decades, the United States is deeply committed to Israel because the vast majority of Americans, Jewish and non-Jewish alike, identify with Israel as a proven friend and ally,” said Harris. “It is this commonality of shared values and shared interests, and not Jackson's conspiratorial notions of power, that unite Israel and America,” Harris said.

This isn’t the first time Jackson has embarrassed Obama. Last summer he made news when he criticized the candidate for talking down to his black supporters in front of a live mike as he awaited a television interview. The minister said that he was so mad that he wanted to castrate Obama.



© 2008 Newsmax. All rights reserved.

[Stark]

[Soul Crusher]

1. Prove it.  False Insinuation based on nothing.
2. Americans who make over a quarter million dollars a year(1-5 percent of all Americans) will see a slight increase of about 3 percent which was the tax policy under Bill Clinton. You sir, DO NOT make 250,000 dollars a year and would benefit MORE with Obama`s tax plan.
3. McCain was for Acorn and has supported it.   http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story/acorn-mccain-have-you-lost/story.aspx?guid=%7B9DF1C9E0-F0BA-4509-B4EC-AF741171DEAC%7D&dist=hppr
4.North Korea has just been taken off the Terror Watch list, Threat list and "enemy list". This is because of direct and engaging diplomacy via talks.  President Bush should be commended for this as well as his present effort for talking with Iran.  Diplomacy works.

1.  Ayeres, Rev. Wright, Saul Alinsky, Farakhan, Raila Odinga, are all marxists who are friends. allies, and supporters of Obama.   

2.  Taxing anyone more in this economy is flat out stupid.  Businesses that have to pay more in taxes will hire less people and order less products.  Just because I may make less than 250 k per year does not mean I want to punish those who do.  You fools have no clue about economics.  Who do you think hires landscapers, roofers, cleaners, architects, etc?  People who make good money.  When they have less due to taxes, they cut back on spending that affects small businesses.   

3.  Obama gave ACORN 800k and they are supporting him for president.   

4.  North Korea has lied about their program and is still activating the nuclear plant.  Chavez, Achmdenajd, Castro are all marxists and if you want to ally with them, fine, I'm glad we dont.

   

[Mars]

this book will open your eyes

[JOHN MATRIX]

this book will open your eyes

very true mars, its a shame most americans would be afraid to touch that book.

[The True Adonis]

Yeah, like I'd be voting for Clinton or Edwards if either of them had won.  I must be voting Republican because I'm a racist, not because Demosocialists suck. 

Be honest at least and admit that you are voting Republican because you champion self-interest over altruism and utilitarianism and in fact you don`t believe in a moral obligation to help the poor, sick, unfortunate and oppressed.

[Cromespyder]

very true mars, its a shame most americans would be afraid to touch that book.

have you read the book? im looking for something for my dad to read on the subject.

[The Coach]

Be honest at least and admit that you are voting Republican because you champion self-interest over altruism and utilitarianism and in fact you don`t believe in a moral obligation to help the poor, sick, unfortunate and oppressed.

Moral obligations shouldn't be forced on by the government to take my or anyone elses hard earned money to give to someone else. If people want to help other people or not, it's their business on what to do with their money.

[tendonitis]

I voluntarily give significant amounts of money to charities that help the poor, sick, unfortunate, and oppressed.  This is far different than money being forcibly taken from me and instead of being used by relatively efficient charities that compete for my money in the marketplace, being given to bloated bureaucracies whose real purpose is to keep the bureaucrats in their jobs and in money and in power to pursue their social engineering rather than to truly help the poor.

very very well said and something the democrats will never understand

[The True Adonis]

I voluntarily give significant amounts of money to charities that help the poor, sick, unfortunate, and oppressed.  This is far different than money being forcibly taken from me and instead of being used by relatively efficient charities that compete for my money in the marketplace, being given to bloated bureaucracies whose real purpose is to keep the bureaucrats in their jobs and in money and in power to pursue their social engineering rather than to truly help the poor.

If we relied solely on the "voluntary charity system" as was propagated in the 18th,19th and early 20th centuries, we would have gross class disparity with no opportunity for advancement for a poor population.  Fairness in employment then erodes, working conditions suffer, wages decline, the economy slows down and an economic down-turn ensues.

Historical oppression due to lack of opportunity and the inadequate funding of charitable causes proves all of the above.

Now, if we cut military spending by a large margin, I can assure you Goatboy that your taxes could be lowered to a great level never before seen in American History.  Taxes are not high because of Social Welfare, they are high because of Military Spending.  You should be angry at the military entities for causing your high taxes. The United States government is currently spending at the rate of approximately $1 trillion per year for all defense-related purposes.  Couple that also with ongoing wars.

That PALES in comparison to the cost of Universal Healthcare for all citizens.  Think of the money thrown away in Iraq and what it COULD HAVE DONE for Americans instead.

[The True Adonis]

[Soul Crusher]

Be honest at least and admit that you are voting Republican because you champion self-interest over altruism and utilitarianism and in fact you don`t believe in a moral obligation to help the poor, sick, unfortunate and oppressed.

We spend tons on the poor now!!!!!!!!  When is enough enough?  WIC, Section 8, Affirmative Action, EEOC, and on and on.

Its never enough the the professional grievance industry in this country.

Its time to put these lazy slobs to work and enough with their "grievances". 

[Soul Crusher]

If we relied solely on the "voluntary charity system" as was propagated in the 18th,19th and early 20th centuries, we would have gross class disparity with no opportunity for advancement for a poor population.  Fairness in employment then erodes, working conditions suffer, wages decline, the economy slows down and an economic down-turn ensues.

Historical oppression due to lack of opportunity and the inadequate funding of charitable causes proves all of the above.

Now, if we cut military spending by a large margin, I can assure you Goatboy that your taxes could be lowered to a great level never before seen in American History.  Taxes are not high because of Social Welfare, they are high because of Military Spending.  You should be angry at the military entities for causing your high taxes. The United States government is currently spending at the rate of approximately $1 trillion per year for all defense-related purposes.  Couple that also with ongoing wars.

That PALES in comparison to the cost of Universal Healthcare for all citizens.  Think of the money thrown away in Iraq and what it COULD HAVE DONE for Americans instead.

You socialists are just too much.  You fools think that the same govt who screwed up in Iraq and Katrina are some how going to get health care right are dreaming and just looking for more welfare and handouts.

Obama is nothing more than a Robin Hood candidate hoping to get enough poor people and uber rich to vote for him so he can implement his marxist master plan for this country.

 

[The True Adonis]

We spend tons on the poor now!!!!!!!!  When is enough enough?  WIC, Section 8, Affirmative Action, EEOC, and on and on.

Its never enough the the professional grievance industry in this country.

Its time to put these lazy slobs to work and enough with their "grievances".