« previous next »
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: Ron Paul vs. Obama in the 2008 election  (Read 672 times)

240 is Back

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 102387
  • Complete website for only $300- www.300website.com
Ron Paul vs. Obama in the 2008 election
« on: November 06, 2008, 09:08:59 AM »
Who would have won?
Logged

Vince G, CSN MFT

  • Competitors II
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 25843
  • GETBIG3.COM!
Re: Ron Paul vs. Obama in the 2008 election
« Reply #1 on: November 06, 2008, 09:14:12 AM »
Quote from: 240 is Back on November 06, 2008, 09:08:59 AM
Who would have won?


Obama.

No matter what, no Republican was going to be elected this year.  He would have done better but people were pissed off at the Republicans this year and they were not going to let another one take office no matter who it was
Logged
A

Decker

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5780
Re: Ron Paul vs. Obama in the 2008 election
« Reply #2 on: November 06, 2008, 09:16:25 AM »
Quote from: 240 is Back on November 06, 2008, 09:08:59 AM
Who would have won?
Mitt Romney.

He did not vote for the war.  He was not part of the Congress pissing away our tax dollars.  He was the best choice for the right to win.

Logged

Buffgeek

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 712
  • I love white women!
Re: Ron Paul vs. Obama in the 2008 election
« Reply #3 on: November 06, 2008, 09:31:57 AM »
Quote from: Vince G, CSN MFT on November 06, 2008, 09:14:12 AM

Obama.

No matter what, no Republican was going to be elected this year.  He would have done better but people were pissed off at the Republicans this year and they were not going to let another one take office no matter who it was

I think you are right.
Logged

Cap

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6363
  • Trueprotein.com 5% discount code= CSP111
Re: Ron Paul vs. Obama in the 2008 election
« Reply #4 on: November 06, 2008, 09:37:01 AM »
Quote from: Decker on November 06, 2008, 09:16:25 AM
Mitt Romney.

He did not vote for the war.  He was not part of the Congress pissing away our tax dollars.  He was the best choice for the right to win.


The election was about Palin and Bush.  Seriously, McCain was out of the equation by a lot of people who vote for Osama.  The economy (which should be up since Barry was voted in  ::)) was the final nail in the coffin for the Republican ticket. 

I think Huck would have been the best choice for VP.  Palin appealed to Hilary and religious voters but that's it, so live and  learn.  The next Republican candidate needs Rove on his team.
Logged
Squishy face retard

Bindare_Dundat

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 12227
  • KILL CENTRAL BANKS, BUY BITCOIN.
Re: Ron Paul vs. Obama in the 2008 election
« Reply #5 on: November 06, 2008, 10:07:57 AM »
Quote from: Vince G, CSN MFT on November 06, 2008, 09:14:12 AM

Obama.

No matter what, no Republican was going to be elected this year.  He would have done better but people were pissed off at the Republicans this year and they were not going to let another one take office no matter who it was

Agree. The damage was done. Despite Ron PAuls common sense people  in general just wated to get away from Republicans as much as possible. Plus, I think a message of all around personal responsibility are down the shitter, everyone would much rather put all their faith into one person/institution fixing everything for them, people expect a government that promises to take care of them from craddle to grave.
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »