Author Topic: What same-sex "marriage" has done to Mass.- It's far worse than most people real  (Read 5140 times)

y19mike77

  • Getbig II
  • **
  • Posts: 251
http://www.massresistance.org/docs/m...ts_of_ssm.html


Anyone who thinks that same-sex “marriage” is a benign eccentricity which won’t affect the average person should consider what it has done in Massachusetts.

It’s become a hammer to force the acceptance and normalization of homosexuality on everyone. And this train is moving fast. What has happened so far is only the beginning.

On November 18, 2003, the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court announced its Goodridge opinion, ruling that it was unconstitutional not to allow same-sex “marriage.” Six months later, homosexual marriages began to be performed.

The public schools
The homosexual “marriage” onslaught in public schools across the state started soon after the November 2003, court decision.

At my own children's high school there was a school-wide assembly to celebrate same-sex “marriage” in early December, 2003.
It featured an array of speakers, including teachers at the school who announced that they would be “marrying” their same-sex partners and starting families either through adoption or artificial insemination. Literature on same-sex marriage – how it is now a normal part of society – was handed out to the students.

Within months it was brought into the middle schools. In September, 2004, an 8th-grade teacher in Brookline, MA, told National Public Radio that the marriage ruling had opened up the floodgates for teaching homosexuality.

“In my mind, I know that, `OK, this is legal now.' If somebody wants to challenge me, I'll say, `Give me a break. It's legal now,'” she told NPR. She added that she now discusses gay sex with her students as explicitly as she desires. For example, she said she tells the kids that lesbians can have vaginal intercourse using sex toys.

By the following year it was in elementary school curricula. Kindergartners were given picture books telling them that same-sex couples are just another kind of family, like their own parents. In 2005, when David Parker of Lexington, MA – a parent of a kindergartner – strongly insisted on being notified when teachers were discussing homosexuality or transgenderism with his son, the school had him arrested and put in jail overnight.

Second graders at the same school were read a book, “King and King”, about two men who have a romance and marry each other, with a picture of them kissing. When parents Rob and Robin Wirthlin complained, they were told that the school had no obligation to notify them or allow them to opt-out their child.

In 2006 the Parkers and Wirthlins filed a federal Civil Rights lawsuit to force the schools to notify parents and allow them to opt-out their elementary-school children when homosexual-related subjects were taught. The federal judges dismissed the case. The judges ruled that because same-sex marriage is legal in Massachusetts, the school actually had a duty to normalize homosexual relationships to children, and that schools have no obligation to notify parents or let them opt-out their children! Acceptance of homosexuality had become a matter of good citizenship!

Think about that: Because same-sex marriage is “legal”, a federal judge has ruled that the schools now have a duty to portray homosexual relationships as normal to children, despite what parents think or believe!

In 2006, in the elementary school where my daughter went to Kindergarten, the parents of a third-grader were forced to take their child out of school because a man undergoing a sex-change operation and cross-dressing was being brought into class to teach the children that there are now “different kinds of families.” School officials told the mother that her complaints to the principal were considered “inappropriate behavior.”

Libraries have also radically changed. School libraries across the state, from elementary school to high school, now have shelves of books to normalize homosexual behavior and the lifestyle in the minds of kids, some of them quite explicit and even pornographic. Parents complaints are ignored or met with hostility.

Over the past year, homosexual groups have been using taxpayer money to distribute a large, slick hardcover book celebrating homosexual marriage titled “Courting Equality” into every school library in the state.

It’s become commonplace in Massachusetts schools for teachers to prominently display photos of their same-sex “spouses” and occasionally bring them to school functions.

Both high schools in my own town now have principals who are “married” to their same-sex partners, whom they bring to school and introduce to the students.


drkaje

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 18182
  • Quiet, Err. I'm transmitting rage.
Get used to it, LOL!

y19mike77

  • Getbig II
  • **
  • Posts: 251
Seems like we are going to have to.

Even when voted against the courts will jus tell you your vote means nothing.


MindSpin

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 9985
  • MMA > Boxing
http://www.massresistance.org/docs/m...ts_of_ssm.html


Anyone who thinks that same-sex “marriage” is a benign eccentricity which won’t affect the average person should consider what it has done in Massachusetts.

It’s become a hammer to force the acceptance and normalization of homosexuality on everyone. And this train is moving fast. What has happened so far is only the beginning.

On November 18, 2003, the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court announced its Goodridge opinion, ruling that it was unconstitutional not to allow same-sex “marriage.” Six months later, homosexual marriages began to be performed.

The public schools
The homosexual “marriage” onslaught in public schools across the state started soon after the November 2003, court decision.

At my own children's high school there was a school-wide assembly to celebrate same-sex “marriage” in early December, 2003.
It featured an array of speakers, including teachers at the school who announced that they would be “marrying” their same-sex partners and starting families either through adoption or artificial insemination. Literature on same-sex marriage – how it is now a normal part of society – was handed out to the students.

Within months it was brought into the middle schools. In September, 2004, an 8th-grade teacher in Brookline, MA, told National Public Radio that the marriage ruling had opened up the floodgates for teaching homosexuality.

“In my mind, I know that, `OK, this is legal now.' If somebody wants to challenge me, I'll say, `Give me a break. It's legal now,'” she told NPR. She added that she now discusses gay sex with her students as explicitly as she desires. For example, she said she tells the kids that lesbians can have vaginal intercourse using sex toys.

By the following year it was in elementary school curricula. Kindergartners were given picture books telling them that same-sex couples are just another kind of family, like their own parents. In 2005, when David Parker of Lexington, MA – a parent of a kindergartner – strongly insisted on being notified when teachers were discussing homosexuality or transgenderism with his son, the school had him arrested and put in jail overnight.

Second graders at the same school were read a book, “King and King”, about two men who have a romance and marry each other, with a picture of them kissing. When parents Rob and Robin Wirthlin complained, they were told that the school had no obligation to notify them or allow them to opt-out their child.

In 2006 the Parkers and Wirthlins filed a federal Civil Rights lawsuit to force the schools to notify parents and allow them to opt-out their elementary-school children when homosexual-related subjects were taught. The federal judges dismissed the case. The judges ruled that because same-sex marriage is legal in Massachusetts, the school actually had a duty to normalize homosexual relationships to children, and that schools have no obligation to notify parents or let them opt-out their children! Acceptance of homosexuality had become a matter of good citizenship!

Think about that: Because same-sex marriage is “legal”, a federal judge has ruled that the schools now have a duty to portray homosexual relationships as normal to children, despite what parents think or believe!

In 2006, in the elementary school where my daughter went to Kindergarten, the parents of a third-grader were forced to take their child out of school because a man undergoing a sex-change operation and cross-dressing was being brought into class to teach the children that there are now “different kinds of families.” School officials told the mother that her complaints to the principal were considered “inappropriate behavior.”

Libraries have also radically changed. School libraries across the state, from elementary school to high school, now have shelves of books to normalize homosexual behavior and the lifestyle in the minds of kids, some of them quite explicit and even pornographic. Parents complaints are ignored or met with hostility.

Over the past year, homosexual groups have been using taxpayer money to distribute a large, slick hardcover book celebrating homosexual marriage titled “Courting Equality” into every school library in the state.

It’s become commonplace in Massachusetts schools for teachers to prominently display photos of their same-sex “spouses” and occasionally bring them to school functions.

Both high schools in my own town now have principals who are “married” to their same-sex partners, whom they bring to school and introduce to the students.



Why are you so afraid of homosexuaity?  So what if kids learn about it?  What's going to happen?  By the way a ban gay marriage is just a way to deny them the same rights that heterosexual couples have.  They can still be married by their church and live the gay life.  The only difference is that you are denying equal rights.  Either way, the homos ain't going away.  You should live your life, and let others live theirs...
w

MindSpin

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 9985
  • MMA > Boxing
Seems like we are going to have to.

Even when voted against the courts will jus tell you your vote means nothing.



exactly!  they can all still get married in their churches.  they just are not being granted the same rights.  so...live with it.
w

Fury

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 21026
  • All aboard the USS Leverage
All you people talking like the world will implode if a state legalizes gay marriage are hilarious. It's not the end of the world. Why are people so infatuated with how other's live their life? Marriage is such a farce at this point in our country regardless.

Oh no, but they put books in the library about homosexuality! They can go right alongside all the other kinds of controversial books libraries usually carry.

drkaje

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 18182
  • Quiet, Err. I'm transmitting rage.
There's still no reason for introducing children to alternate lifestyles.

What's next?

shootfighter1

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5674
  • Competitor- NABBA Nationals Overall Champ
There are more important issues IMO, but we have appropriately recognized civil unions that give the same basic rights, we shouldn't be redefining marriage.

y19mike77

  • Getbig II
  • **
  • Posts: 251
Why are you so afraid of homosexuaity?  So what if kids learn about it?  What's going to happen?  By the way a ban gay marriage is just a way to deny them the same rights that heterosexual couples have.  They can still be married by their church and live the gay life.  The only difference is that you are denying equal rights.  Either way, the homos ain't going away.  You should live your life, and let others live theirs...


I think its funny that whenever somebody is against gay marriage you assume there afraid of homosexuals.


Being gay is a lifestyle choice and so is being a petafile. So should we would also start having petafiles going to schools explaining how its ok and acceptable?

I dont care who is gay. But do not bring it into public schools, and force my kid to listen to how great being gay is.

Marriage is between a man and a woman period, and the majority of U.S. agrees.



y19mike77

  • Getbig II
  • **
  • Posts: 251
There are more important issues IMO, but we have appropriately recognized civil unions that give the same basic rights, we shouldn't be redefining marriage.

Well said.

shootfighter1

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5674
  • Competitor- NABBA Nationals Overall Champ
And I agree with the Doc.  We must teach tolerance but don't focus or set aside teaching time for same sex relationships in public schools.  Inappropriate.  Too many agendas and indoctrinations.  We have our work cut out for us in educating American children already.

Buffgeek

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 712
  • I love white women!
Just another reason to avoid public schools.

MindSpin

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 9985
  • MMA > Boxing

I think its funny that whenever somebody is against gay marriage you assume there afraid of homosexuals.


Being gay is a lifestyle choice and so is being a petafile. So should we would also start having petafiles going to schools explaining how its ok and acceptable?

I dont care who is gay. But do not bring it into public schools, and force my kid to listen to how great being gay is.

Marriage is between a man and a woman period, and the majority of U.S. agrees.




How on earth can you actually believe that being gay is a choice?  I love pussy.  Pussy pussy pussy.  Why would I wake up one day and CHOOSE to instead like cock!?  Seriously man...are you for real ???
w

Deicide

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22921
  • Reapers...
Fucking hysterical...end of the fucking world... :D
I hate the State.

y19mike77

  • Getbig II
  • **
  • Posts: 251
How on earth can you actually believe that being gay is a choice?  I love pussy.  Pussy pussy pussy.  Why would I wake up one day and CHOOSE to instead like cock!?  Seriously man...are you for real ???

There are plenty of men who late in life decide that they want to be with other men instead of a woman.

You could say the pressure of society made them hide themselves. A majority of the time that may be true. Sometimes I am sure its a choice that is made.


Deicide

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22921
  • Reapers...
There are plenty of men who late in life decide that they want to be with other men instead of a woman.

You could say the pressure of society made them hide themselves. A majority of the time that may be true. Sometimes I am sure its a choice that is made.


 ::)
I hate the State.

dantelis

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1867
  • Mesmerizing, isn't it.
Mike77,  Can you back up your info from another source other than massresistance.org?  Seems like a lot of hearsay or info created by that extreme right-wing organization with their specific agenda than credible facts.

y19mike77

  • Getbig II
  • **
  • Posts: 251
Yeah I will look around for some other reports.

y19mike77

  • Getbig II
  • **
  • Posts: 251
Will gay marriage be taught in public schools if Prop. 8 fails?
UPDATE: Local school board members and district officials say they will not adopt policies to change marriage definition in school curriculum even if Prop. 8 fails.
By FERMIN LEAL
The Orange County Register
Comments 910 | Recommend 28

The school-teacher type woman sits on a desk in front of a blackboard to deliver her message: “Gay marriages have everything to do with schools.

She clicks on a television screen, where viewers meet Robb and Robin Wirthlin of Lexington, Mass.

“Our son came home and told us the school taught him that boys can marry other boys. He’s in second grade,” says Robin Wirthlin, who, with her husband, unsuccessfully sued their school district after a teacher discussed gay marriage in the classroom.

The 30-second TV commercial warns that if California voters reject Proposition 8 – a constitutional amendment that defines marriage as being between a man and woman – local schools could emulate Massachusetts and teach young children about gay marriage.

Is that true? The answer, as it turns out, is a bit cloudy.

Hilary McLean, a spokeswoman for state Superintendent Jack O’Connell, said the decision to teach gay marriage lies with local communities and school boards.

“Schools are not required to talk about marriage at all,” McLean said. “It’s up to local school districts to decide.”

The state Education Code will be unaffected by passage or failure of Prop. 8.

The code only instructs schools to “teach respect for marriage and committed relationships” as part of health and sex education curriculum. The code allows districts to decide against teaching health and sex education, and allows parents to pull their children from those classes or others dealing with sensitive subject matters.

Ocean View School District trustee John Briscoe, a supporter of Prop. 8, said the Education Code and state curriculum may not change right away if Prop. 8 fails, but having gay marriage become legal would eventually prompt challenges to reflect the law of the land, limiting the decision-making power of local school boards.

“Local schools boards can approve their own curriculum, but they must meet under the umbrella of state standards,” Briscoe said. “To say that the state department of education’s hands will be free of this gay marriage issue is false.”

Santa Ana Unified trustee Rosemarie Avila, another supporter of Prop. 8, also said she would oppose policies to incorporate gay marriage into the curriculum, but the state often has more than control over curriculum like sex education than local school boards.

None of the state’s 1,000 districts have so far adopted policies to reflect May's state Supreme Court’s legalization of gay marriage. Officials from other county school districts said they doubt any local agencies would voluntarily be willing to take on the issue by adopting policies that incorporate aspects of gay marriage if Prop. 8 fails.

“Proposition 8 does not deal with curriculum, so its passage or failure would not impact instruction,” said Ian Hanigan, spokesman for Irvine Unified, a district that offers comprehensive sex education instruction to adolescents. “There has never been a directive from the state that specifies marriage as applying to ‘heterosexual’ or ‘homosexual’ couples.”

In Garden Grove Unified, the concept of marriage is not taught as part of regular curriculum, so changes in the law would also not change class instruction, said Alan Trudell, the district’s spokesman.

Officials from Newport-Mesa Unified and Westminster School District also said they don’t expect the failure of Prop. 8 to change district policies, which do not require discussion of gender as it relates to marriage.

But Sonja Eddings Brown, deputy communications director for Protect Marriage Coalition, said the failure of Prop. 8 could allow for discussion of gay marriage to surface outside the sex education curriculum, and potentially in the early school grades.

“Schools begin talking to children about the characteristics of family and marriage as early as the second grade,” Brown said. “We are not challenging the rights of gays to marry, but what we are challenging is when those rights are forced into the classroom.”

Brown points to the Wirthlin lawsuit from Massachusetts, where a teacher read a fairy tale to students about how two princes kissed and could marry each other. The teacher did not notify parents prior to the reading.

In that case, a federal appeals court rejected the parents’ argument that the Lexington public school district should have given them prior notice that it was going to include books that include gay families on their student reading lists. The U.S. Supreme Court refused to hear the case earlier this month, allowing the appeals court ruling to stand.

Robb and Robin Wirthlin are traveling through California campaigning for Prop. 8.

“This is why so many parents are getting behind Prop. 8,” Brown said. “If this fails, gay activists can come in and file lawsuits to demand gay marriage be included in class discussions about family.”

Kate Kendell, executive director for the national Center for Lesbian Rights, said it’s a mistake to compare Massachusetts education policy with that of California because of the different education laws and provisions for opting out offered to parents in California.

“The claim that Prop. 8 has anything to do with schools is a lie,” Kendell said. “The way children are taught today won’t change one bit.”

The California Teachers Association, state superintendent O’Connell, Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger, the American Civil Liberties Union, and gay and civil rights groups oppose Prop. 8, saying it is misleading to inject education into the debate over gay marriage.

“Bringing in education as part of the campaign for Prop. 8 is solely designed to scare people into supporting the elimination of rights of people to marry the person they love,” Kendell said.

On Tuesday, supporters of Prop. 8 attempted through blogs and e-mails to encourage parents to keep their kids home from school to protest a decision last week by the California Teachers Association to donate $1 million to the “No on Prop. 8” campaign. But local school districts reported no significant changes in absentee rates.

A poll released Friday by CBS news and SurveyUSA shows Prop. 8 leading with likely voters across the state, 48 percent to 45 percent.

timfogarty

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7108
  • @fogartyTim on twitter
Being gay is a lifestyle choice and so is being a petafile. So should we would also start having petafiles going to schools explaining how its ok and acceptable?

please, oh please learn how to spell.   It is pedophile in American English, paeodofile in Britain.

and the reason why pedophilia is not acceptable is the same reason bestiality is not:  neither children nor animals are able to give consent.

Arnold jr

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7247
  • fleshandiron.com
The problem with this is they are teaching and promoting behavior that has no place in a young persons life...2nd graders, are you kidding me?

Imagine it, if there was literature being handed out on how to properly fuck your girlfriend doggy style or how to make 69ing more exciting with your boy friend or girlfriend, if there was heterosexual literature like this being taught in the schools parents would be outraged...as well they should be. There are things that are appropriate in life at a certain age, and things that are not. Taking away a child's innocence is not appropriate. There is no need for it and this type of thing only leads to the degradation of a child's mind.

Deicide

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22921
  • Reapers...
The problem with this is they are teaching and promoting behavior that has no place in a young persons life...2nd graders, are you kidding me?

Imagine it, if there was literature being handed out on how to properly fuck your girlfriend doggy style or how to make 69ing more exciting with your boy friend or girlfriend, if there was heterosexual literature like this being taught in the schools parents would be outraged...as well they should be. There are things that are appropriate in life at a certain age, and things that are not. Taking away a child's innocence is not appropriate. There is no need for it and this type of thing only leads to the degradation of a child's mind.

Children have no innocence. Some of them fuck each other at age 10 these days.
I hate the State.

Arnold jr

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7247
  • fleshandiron.com
Children have no innocence. Some of them fuck each other at age 10 these days.

You're absolutely right, innocence is something that continues to be taken away from children more and more. IMO, it's a shame. There is no reason to subject children to certain things. Even though every human is responsible for their actions, even children, in this case the burden of responsibility lies within the society as a whole. It lies within the parents, the families...pretty much those who are not children.

Buffgeek

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 712
  • I love white women!
Children have no innocence. Some of them fuck each other at age 10 these days.

Yeah because they are exposed to shit that they shouldnt be at a young age.

tonymctones

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 26520

I think its funny that whenever somebody is against gay marriage you assume there afraid of homosexuals.

Being gay is a lifestyle choice and so is being a petafile. So should we would also start having petafiles going to schools explaining how its ok and acceptable?

I dont care who is gay. But do not bring it into public schools, and force my kid to listen to how great being gay is.

Marriage is between a man and a woman period, and the majority of U.S. agrees.
I think that is hillarious and quite ignorant as well...I have nothing against homosexuals, Ive had gay friends and wish them nothing but the best. I will not vote however for a redefinition of marriage, marriage is a religious institution and not up to the government to redefine. If they want to create civil unions i am all for that i want them to have the same rights straight ppl do and I will vote for that any day.