Author Topic: 3 Best Backs in the HISTORY OF THE SPORT  (Read 80949 times)

d0nny2600

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4429
  • http://i.imgur.com/mCzI3N5.jpg
Re: 3 Best Backs in the HISTORY OF THE SPORT
« Reply #275 on: November 28, 2008, 02:20:48 PM »
LMFAO Dorian's back was ' paper thin ' compared to Ronnie LMMFAO you just posted a pic of a 247 pound Ronnie and claimed his back is thicker than a 257 pound Dorian Yates LMMFAO you're retarded

and your pathetic attempt at an analysis is laughable his back is better because he has ' better arms ' lmfao thicker? talk about a blanket statement , Ronnie's back isn;t as thick as Dorian being 10 pounds lighter , better detail ? where ? where is the better detail?

Ronnie said Dorian's back was the best ever and he knows far more than you

Samir said Dorian's back was the best ever and he knows far more than you

Team Flex in 2000 said Dorian back was the best ever and they know far more than you

Markus Rhul said Dorian;s back was the best ever and he knows far more than you

Ellington Darden, Ph.D. said Dorian's back was the best ever and he knows far more than you

I said Dorian's back was the best ever and I clearly know far more than YOU

thanks for exposing yourself as the ignorant bias stupid troll you are


and look up the word backfire and see how Dorian is destroying Ronnie in that pics
Monster owning.

bodybuilder1234

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3749
  • Manny Pacquiao KO Floyd 1
Re: 3 Best Backs in the HISTORY OF THE SPORT
« Reply #276 on: November 28, 2008, 02:26:51 PM »
You just posted pics of Dorian destroying Ronnie's smooth plastic looking back........ ???

exactly, the lighting from Ronnie's pic is much better but his back is inferior to Yates

Yates has a bigger more striated back

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83179
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: 3 Best Backs in the HISTORY OF THE SPORT
« Reply #277 on: November 28, 2008, 02:33:20 PM »
exactly, the lighting from Ronnie's pic is much better but his back is inferior to Yates

Yates has a bigger more striated back

The picture of Ronnie is from a photoshoot after he won the 2001 Mr Olympia and the Yates pic is a contest shot from the 1993 Olympia , needless to say camera technology vastly improved from 1993-to-2001

IceCold

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4878
  • Getbig!
Re: 3 Best Backs in the HISTORY OF THE SPORT
« Reply #278 on: November 28, 2008, 02:35:47 PM »
he had the greatest back ever when he competed, but that standard was far eclipsed by Ronnie later on.

just ask Peter McGough, ND's best friend and worst enemy lol

just ask ronnie himself.

u think your so smart by posting quotes from certain people, thinking we don't know about the others.

fucking idiot.

ronnie ,july FLEX 2003, well after ronnie's best showings:

DESCRIBE DORIAN YATES: A close friend. Dorian is very intelligent, a great Mr. Olympia. He had the best side-chest pose and the thickest freakiest back I have ever seen.

R.I.P. DIMEBAG DARRELL ABBOTT (1966-2004)

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83179
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: 3 Best Backs in the HISTORY OF THE SPORT
« Reply #279 on: November 28, 2008, 02:37:52 PM »
just ask ronnie himself.

u think your so smart by posting quotes from certain people, thinking we don't know about the others.

fucking idiot.

ronnie ,july FLEX 2003, well after ronnie's best showings:

DESCRIBE DORIAN YATES: A close friend. Dorian is very intelligent, a great Mr. Olympia. He had the best side-chest pose and the thickest freakiest back I have ever seen.



lol Hulkster is owned as usual he's like a prison bitch being handed from inmate to inmate being violated lol

Mr.1derful

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4941
Re: 3 Best Backs in the HISTORY OF THE SPORT
« Reply #280 on: November 28, 2008, 02:46:11 PM »
Dorian owning the shit out of everyone, as usual! ;D  Poor Shawn and Nasser. :'(  Would you care to dispute Yates's dominance in this shot, Hulkster?

sculpture

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2544
  • Getbig!
Re: 3 Best Backs in the HISTORY OF THE SPORT
« Reply #281 on: November 28, 2008, 03:27:19 PM »
No one ever has disputed his dominance against shawn and nasser from the back.

From the front however the situation is reversed.

My my, how ever did the judges award this man perfect scores.

The Showstoppa

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 26879
  • Call the vet, cause these pythons are sick!
Re: 3 Best Backs in the HISTORY OF THE SPORT
« Reply #282 on: November 28, 2008, 03:29:33 PM »

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83179
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: 3 Best Backs in the HISTORY OF THE SPORT
« Reply #283 on: November 28, 2008, 03:35:03 PM »
No one ever has disputed his dominance against shawn and nasser from the back.

From the front however the situation is reversed.

My my, how ever did the judges award this man perfect scores.

He dominated everyone from every angle , did you miss the part where he meets ALL of the criteria better than his contemporaries ? all rounds are physique rounds , while some of his contemporaries meet part(s) of the criteria better than him NONE of them meet all of the criteria better than him and that's how contests are judged.

regmac

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4304
Re: 3 Best Backs in the HISTORY OF THE SPORT
« Reply #284 on: November 28, 2008, 03:43:17 PM »
3 Mutants, each with a back that could block out the sun.

Sorry   but IMO Pete does NOT belong in that departemnt.  His back is just another back on stage.  Yates, Coleman, and LEE  (BIG BACK) HANEY had the ones that had you begging for the head judge to ask for rear lat spreads!!!   Petes cool  but his bakc is just (yaaaawn) another back.
((-::

Mr.1derful

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4941
Re: 3 Best Backs in the HISTORY OF THE SPORT
« Reply #285 on: November 28, 2008, 03:45:02 PM »
He dominated everyone from every angle , did you miss the part where he meets ALL of the criteria better than his contemporaries ? all rounds are physique rounds , while some of his contemporaries meet part(s) of the criteria better than him NONE of them meet all of the criteria better than him and that's how contests are judged.

ND, funny isn't it that no matter how obvious Dorian's advantage is, there are those that will suggest the exact opposite.  They even have the audacity to try dispute 1993 and 1995, where Dorian was unquestionably worlds better than the rest.  I can recall Paul Dillet, in Flex, in reference to the 1995 contest, saying how unreal Dorian was and that he was just glad to not be near Dorian onstage so as not to look bad in comparison.  Somehow, admissions by top conteders themselves are not to be believed, as "experts" such as Hulkster know better.  

regmac

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4304
Re: 3 Best Backs in the HISTORY OF THE SPORT
« Reply #286 on: November 28, 2008, 03:49:07 PM »
What's sad is   Paul  DID have an unbeatable back in the 92 North American, the 93 Ironman and the 93 ASC. I have no idea what happened there after. After that his poses were like Shaq's free throw shots.
((-::

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83179
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: 3 Best Backs in the HISTORY OF THE SPORT
« Reply #287 on: November 28, 2008, 03:51:20 PM »
ND, funny isn't it that no matter how obvious Dorian's advantage is, there are those that will suggest the exact opposite.  They even have the audacity to try dispute 1993 and 1995, where Dorian was unquestionably worlds better than the rest.  I can recall Paul Dillet, in Flex, in reference to the 1995 contest, saying how unreal Dorian was and that he was just glad to not be near Dorian onstage so as not to look bad in comparison.  Somehow, admissions by top conteders themselves are not to be believed, as "experts" such as Hulkster know better.  

Hulkster already claimed Dorian lost the 1993 Mr Olympia to Flex Wheeler and he was quote " vastly overrated post tear " 1995 included , he's a troll a biased troll who knows he's wrong and just wants to try and save face , him and his comrades constantly and consistently try to rewrite bodybuilding history , it's easier to claim politics than it is to admit they're wrong

either way history proves them wrong

Dorian Yates win/loss ratio 88% never placed below 2nd place in ANY pro-show hands down the most dominant bodybuilder in the history of the sport .

Mr.1derful

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4941
Re: 3 Best Backs in the HISTORY OF THE SPORT
« Reply #288 on: November 28, 2008, 03:54:45 PM »
Dorian owning the shit out of everyone, as usual! ;D  Poor Shawn and Nasser. :'(  Would you care to dispute Yates's dominance in this shot, Hulkster?

Still waiting Hulkster. ;D  By the way, I'd include a comparison shot with Coleman from the show, but he didn't get the call outs, ha ha.

NeoSeminole

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5589
  • Ronnie > Dorian
Re: 3 Best Backs in the HISTORY OF THE SPORT
« Reply #289 on: November 28, 2008, 06:49:38 PM »
you guys still going at it? This subject has already been covered with Ronnie being declared the victor. Now enjoy your Thanksgiving break!

NeoSeminole

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5589
  • Ronnie > Dorian
Re: 3 Best Backs in the HISTORY OF THE SPORT
« Reply #290 on: November 28, 2008, 06:53:33 PM »
;) ;) ;)


Mr.1derful

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4941
Re: 3 Best Backs in the HISTORY OF THE SPORT
« Reply #291 on: November 28, 2008, 06:53:51 PM »
you guys still going at it? This subject has already been covered with Ronnie Dorian being declared the overwhelming victor and Greatest of All Time. Now enjoy your Thanksgiving break!


NeoSeminole

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5589
  • Ronnie > Dorian
Re: 3 Best Backs in the HISTORY OF THE SPORT
« Reply #292 on: November 28, 2008, 06:54:29 PM »
;) ;) ;)



skip to 56 sec.

"the most incredible back in bodybuilding history, I believe, right there. Dorian was noted for his back. Lee Haney for his, but this man's back is just like something out of a comic book."

Mr.1derful

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4941
Re: 3 Best Backs in the HISTORY OF THE SPORT
« Reply #293 on: November 28, 2008, 07:01:33 PM »
;) ;) ;)



skip to 56 sec.



"the most incredible back in bodybuilding history, I believe, right there. Dorian was noted for his back. Lee Haney for his, but this man's back is just like something out of a comic book."

Honestly, Ronnie's back looks like it's holding water in that clip.  Not to fear, however, that is not the case in this one.


NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83179
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: 3 Best Backs in the HISTORY OF THE SPORT
« Reply #294 on: November 28, 2008, 07:01:50 PM »
;) ;) ;)



skip to 56 sec.

"the most incredible back in bodybuilding history, I believe, right there. Dorian was noted for his back. Lee Haney for his, but this man's back is just like something out of a comic book."

That means what? it's true? that was 2002 his back was ' soft ' compared to 2001 ACS and 1998 what advantage is a soft back?

Again Ronnie himself said Dorian had the thickest & freakiest back HE ever seen this counts less than what Mike Mattarazzo says? or others? you're not looking objectively , just looking for anyone who will agree with you .

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83179
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: 3 Best Backs in the HISTORY OF THE SPORT
« Reply #295 on: November 28, 2008, 07:03:02 PM »
Honestly, Ronnie's back looks like it's holding water in that clip.  Not to fear, however, that is not the case in this one.



Ha Ha Ha Ha dead on the money , that's from 2000 where he was softer than 99 and a lot softer compared to 1998 and his personal best 2001 ASC

his back is big , wide and soft that's not an advantage

NeoSeminole

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5589
  • Ronnie > Dorian
Re: 3 Best Backs in the HISTORY OF THE SPORT
« Reply #296 on: November 28, 2008, 07:03:54 PM »
;) ;) ;)

Jim Schmaltz – Flex, April 2002

“The 37-year-old Coleman has what many of the sport's analysts feel is the best back ever.”

Peter McGough - Flex, December 2006

"The best back ever lacked its eye-popping detail and fullness." (in reference to Ronnie at the 06 Mr. O)

1998 Mr. Olympia Contest Review by Max Muscle Sports and Fitness

Only Milos Sarcev, in his evaluation of Mr. Olympia contenders in the last issue of Max Muscle, saw Coleman as having a good chance: "At this time, Ron has the best back in the history of the sport," said Mishko, "even better than Bannout and Haney, or Dorian. Ron's thicker, wider, more pleasing.”

http://www.maxmuscle.com/index.cfm?fa=article&doc_id=22&subcat=body_building

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83179
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: 3 Best Backs in the HISTORY OF THE SPORT
« Reply #297 on: November 28, 2008, 07:05:12 PM »
;) ;) ;)



Oh no it must be true  ::) same magazine 2000 declares Dorian best back ever , during Ronnie's reign his back didn't get any harder post 2000 with the exception of the ASC in 01 where it was smaller , Dorian's back in that black & white pictures oblierates Ronnie's 2001 with ease , everything Ronnie has Dorian has in spades.

NeoSeminole

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5589
  • Ronnie > Dorian
Re: 3 Best Backs in the HISTORY OF THE SPORT
« Reply #298 on: November 28, 2008, 07:05:38 PM »
Honestly, Ronnie's back looks like it's holding water in that clip.  Not to fear, however, that is not the case in this one.

ha ha ha, what do you know? You weren't even at the contest. So your opinion means shit.

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83179
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: 3 Best Backs in the HISTORY OF THE SPORT
« Reply #299 on: November 28, 2008, 07:07:32 PM »
ha ha ha, what do you know? You weren't even at the contest. So your opinion means shit.

Ha Ha Ha Ha Neo owned ....next


Quote Peter McGough Flex Magazine Jan 2001

RONNIE COLEMAN : ( 264lbs As big as a house , but holding water. In '98 , he was shredded and bone dry at 250 pounds. Last year ( 1999 ) he was 257 pounds but NOT as sharp as '98. This year ( 2000 ) at 264 pounds , he's not as sharp as 99 , which would seem to say that Ronnie is better at a lighter weight .