3 Best Backs in the HISTORY OF THE SPORT

[Hulkster]

the thing you will NEVER be able to get around is the fact that Ronnie will NEVER be as hard or as dry as Dorian , so posting pics of him offseason looking soft compared to Yates proves zero

Dorian's back is still better and not soft 

offseason?

you do realize that those precontest pics of dorian was the best physique he EVER presented.

he NEVER looked that good onstage EVER.

Ronnie crushes the  best dorian ever presented and you can't deal with it.

here is one more for you to whine about and make excuses:

[pumpster]

This coming from the guy who searched the internet for pictures of mens testes , saved it to his hardrive and then posted it , who brags about the gorgeous transexuals he had chances with lol

Check that, ND would like to be the wife! 

[NarcissisticDeity]

offseason?

you do realize that those precontest pics of dorian was the best physique he EVER presented.

he NEVER looked that good onstage EVER.

Ronnie crushes the  best dorian ever presented and you can't deal with it.

here is one more for you to whine about and make excuses:

I don't need excuses FACT Ronnie was never as hard or as dry as Dorian , that's 2 parts of the judging criteria he can NEVER gain on Yates , Dorian has better balance & proportion another 2 parts of the judging criteria lol posing & presentation ? you guessed it muscular bulk? depending on the year Ronnie can compete with Yates or surpass him in this area HOWEVER one must recall all rounds are physique rounds this Ronnie can NEVER beat Dorian

which is why he said so on multiple occasions lol sucker you have zero

wait until the new pics of Yates are posted and you go nuclear lol

[pumpster]

offseason?

you do realize that those precontest pics of dorian was the best physique he EVER presented.

he NEVER looked that good onstage EVER.

hahaha OWNED . ND walks in to yet another door.

[Mr.1derful]

Funny how when the black and white photo's are rolled out, the trolls protest being that it is not from an actual contest.  But, when their hero gets destroyed by contest photos, they then revert to off season pics of Ronnie from 2003 and post a '92 Yates contest shot.  They get owned at every turn and keep playing games as a misdirect from the fact that their hero Ronnie, can't hang with Yates.  None of them has had the balls to comment on the clip from 1995 of Yates because they know that Yates has a back that has never been matched.  

Hypocrites is what they are.  If the topic is of 1993 Yates, who was perhaps the most complete champion ever, they resort to posting post bicep tear photos, most notably from 1994.  Then turnabout is fair play.  Being that the title of the thread is the greatest back, then they should not mind when back shots of contest Ronnie looking a complete mess are posted.  The one tried and true fact is that no matter the circumstances, Yates always had a great back. The same CAN'T be said for Ronnie, period.  







Even Ronnie knows he looks like shit!

[Mr.1derful]

 

[XFACTOR]

offseason?

you do realize that those precontest pics of dorian was the best physique he EVER presented.

he NEVER looked that good onstage EVER.

Ronnie crushes the  best dorian ever presented and you can't deal with it.

here is one more for you to whine about and make excuses:

Dorian looks awesome there!!  Holy shit!!

[Camel Jockey]

Funny how when the black and white photo's are rolled out, the trolls protest being that it is not from an actual contest.  But, when their hero gets destroyed by contest photos, they then revert to off season pics of Ronnie from 2003 and post a '92 Yates contest shot.  They get owned at every turn and keep playing games as a misdirect from the fact that their hero Ronnie, can't hang with Yates.  None of them has had the balls to comment on the clip from 1995 of Yates because they know that Yates has a back that has never been matched.  

Hypocrites is what they are.  If the topic is of 1993 Yates, who was perhaps the most complete champion ever, they resort to posting post bicep tear photos, most notably from 1994.  Then turnabout is fair play.  Being that the title of the thread is the greatest back, then they should not mind when back shots of contest Ronnie looking a complete mess are posted.  The one tried and true fact, is that no matter the circumstances, Yates always had a great back, the same CAN'T be said for Ronnie, period.  

You are posting pictures of him when he was already past his prime and had torn up muscles.

Try 1998, 1999, 2000, 2003, 2004, fucking dolt.

[Mr.1derful]

You are posting pictures of him when he was already past his prime and had torn up muscles.

Try 1998, 1999, 2000, 2003, 2004, fucking dolt.

Someday when you can actually read above a first grade level, you'll be able to decifer that that was precisely the point of my post. lol  Stay in school.

[NeoSeminole]

I never ignored any quotes that a another one of your many lies , every quote you ever posted I addressed period. I don't need to run especially when the topic is subjective.

stop lying. You ignore the quote from Joe Weider agreeing with Jay Cutler's assessment that Ronnie has the greatest physique of all-time. You ignore the quote from Team Flex saying 01 ASC Ronnie is the best ever or that Ronnie has the greatest back in history. You ignore the quote from Lonnie Teper saying that it's hard to imagine anybody who's ever stepped on stage could beat a prime Ronnie. You ignore the quote from Muscletime.com saying there is nobody alive who can beat Ronnie at his best.

thicker & wider YES more defined NO sorry sport that's simply not true in fact if you missed the McGough quote from 2000 he states the obvious Ronnie's hardness and dryness suffer the heavier he became which would indicate he's better at a lighter weight , this was Ronnie at 264 pounds never mind the 287 pound Ronnie , Ronnie's best overall package for his back was probably 1998/2001 when he was at his hardest & driest

Ronnie wasn't heavier at the 01 ASC, you idiot. Why do you think I specifically said "depending on year?" Looking at pics, his back was bigger and more defined than in 98.

You dismissed McGough as flat out wrong on the subject of competitive bodybuilding lol now YOU need him he's an expert lol you played yourself Neo lol and NO I'm working with more than Rhul . Ronnie himself who is an expert on backs , Samir he's also an expert , plus Rhul , plus Team Flex , from 2000 and this is from the article you're clinging to

it's one way or the other. If you pick which quotes to accept and ignore, then I'm allowed to do the same. As for Ronnie and Samir, they are are not experts. Ronnie believes he should of won a contest he lost and Samir picked 3rd place Gustavo Badell over 1st place finisher Ronnie in the challenge round pose down. Both have proven they are incapable of accurately judging physiques. The fact you continue to quote them shows you're grasping at straws.

and you never answered the question , I don't care what Milos says you and him are fucking high if you think he has a thicker & wider back at 247 pounds in 1998 than Dorian from 1993/1995/1997 even NO WAY IN HELL , 2003 perhaps 1998 get the fuck out of here

ha ha ha, oh please. You've never even seen both of them at their primes and you're arguing with a respected expert in the bodybuilding community who has stood on stage next to both? You really crack me up!

fuck me your missing the point , it doesn't matter if he says Dorian has the greatest of all-time , what matters is he's very generous with his praise and how could he possibly go down as the greatest bodybuilder of all-time without having the greatest physique? stop playing stupid

ok...? What does this have to do with best physique or best back?

o.k he says Ronnie would beat Dorian what does that mean? it's true? Lee Priest says Dorian would easily beat Ronnie is this a fact? NO nice try

how do you say it? When one person backs up what others have said, then it's called "converging evidence."

[grab an umbrella]

it feels like there was a thread somewhere that this argument already took place...wasn't it like 2 or 3 pages long?

[NeoSeminole]

[Hulkster]

 

ronnie near the end of his career compared to dorian near the beginning:

care to explain?

 

[grab an umbrella]

Wow, this is truly unbelievable.  You guys debated for thousands of pages and your still going...I'm not even mad, I'm actually quite impressed

[Hulkster]

You are posting pictures of him when he was already past his prime and had torn up muscles.

Try 1998, 1999, 2000, 2003, 2004, fucking dolt.

they are scared to because Ronnie 99 destroys the best dorian ever presented and they know it:

[NarcissisticDeity]

stop lying. You ignore the quote from Joe Weider agreeing with Jay Cutler's assessment that Ronnie has the greatest physique of all-time. You ignore the quote from Team Flex saying 01 ASC Ronnie is the best ever or that Ronnie has the greatest back in history. You ignore the quote from Lonnie Teper saying that it's hard to imagine anybody who's ever stepped on stage could beat a prime Ronnie. You ignore the quote from Muscletime.com saying there is nobody alive who can beat Ronnie at his best.

Ronnie wasn't heavier at the 01 ASC, you idiot. Why do you think I specifically said "depending on year?" Looking at pics, his back was bigger and more defined than in 98.

it's one way or the other. If you pick which quotes to accept and ignore, then I'm allowed to do the same. As for Ronnie and Samir, they are are not experts. Ronnie believes he should of won a contest he lost and Samir picked 3rd place Gustavo Badell over 1st place finisher Ronnie in the challenge round pose down. Both have proven they are incapable of accurately judging physiques. The fact you continue to quote them shows you're grasping at straws.

ha ha ha, oh please. You've never even seen both of them at their primes and you're arguing with a respected expert in the bodybuilding community who has stood on stage next to both? You really crack me up!

ok...? What does this have to do with best physique or best back?

how do you say it? When one person backs up what others have said, then it's called "converging evidence."

stop lying. You ignore the quote from Joe Weider agreeing with Jay Cutler's assessment that Ronnie has the greatest physique of all-time. You ignore the quote from Team Flex saying 01 ASC Ronnie is the best ever or that Ronnie has the greatest back in history. You ignore the quote from Lonnie Teper saying that it's hard to imagine anybody who's ever stepped on stage could beat a prime Ronnie. You ignore the quote from Muscletime.com saying there is nobody alive who can beat Ronnie at his best.

I never ignored any quote you posted ever thats a flat out lie , I addressed every quote you ever posted even the ones that you manipulated  in fact I posted the quote from McGough about 2001 until then you never seen it , ignored what? yeah I thought so

Ronnie wasn't heavier at the 01 ASC, you idiot. Why do you think I specifically said "depending on year?" Looking at pics, his back was bigger and more defined than in 98.

his back was bigger and more defined than in 98  says YOU he was the exact same weight in both contests 247 pounds MAX you're high if you think a 247 lb Ronnie has a thicker & wider back than Dorian at 269 pounds or even 257 pounds

it's one way or the other. If you pick which quotes to accept and ignore, then I'm allowed to do the same. As for Ronnie and Samir, they are are not experts. Ronnie believes he should of won a contest he lost and Samir picked 3rd place Gustavo Badell over 1st place finisher Ronnie in the challenge round pose down. Both have proven they are incapable of accurately judging physiques. The fact you continue to quote them shows you're grasping at straws.

I never ignored any quotes that a lie , you're the absolute dummy who claimed " if you believe one quote then you're bound to believe them all ' this is your logic NOT mine and you haven't stood by your own logic that makes you a hypocrite  Peter McGough is an expert when YOU need him to be , but when he clearly corrects your ignorance he's flat out wrong lol classic hypocrite Neo

ha ha ha, oh please. You've never even seen both of them at their primes and you're arguing with a respected expert in the bodybuilding community who has stood on stage next to both? You really crack me up!

more hypocritical posts by you lol I love exposing your pathetic logic , Ronnie Coleman stood next to Dorian Yates and when he says his back is the thickest & freakiest he ever seen , he's an idiot , he doesn't know what he;s talking about LMMFAO keep playing yourself you idiot lol

you and Milos are idiots if you thick Ronnie Coleman 1998 at 247 pounds has a thicker & wider back than Dorian at 257/260/268 pounds period.

ok...? What does this have to do with best physique or best back?

zooom right over your head lol

how do you say it? When one person backs up what others have said, then it's called "converging evidence."

it's only converging evidence when its in your favor lol hypocrite ring a bell? when a group of people all say Dorian has the best back , they're all wrong , when a group says Ronnie they're all right

bottom line you're a hypocrite and not a very bright one at that lol

[LatsMcGee]

Dorian and Ronnie both kill Nasser.

[sculpture]

ronnie near the end of his career compared to dorian near the beginning:

care to explain?

 

hahahahah

what a great point.

this mr 1derful is proving to be a right plank

I'm glad i'm not the only one who's developed a distaste for this fellow.

[NarcissisticDeity]

ronnie near the end of his career compared to dorian near the beginning:

care to explain?

 

One is flexing and the other isn't  and FYI dummy that's Dorian 5 years into his career

[Mr.1derful]

One is flexing and the other isn't  and FYI dummy that's Dorian 5 years into his career

I couldn't have said it better myself. lol  For the benefit of the trolls, I will use another Sesame Street reference, only this time to the "One of these things is not like the others" game. The answer, would be that Dorian has two lats and Ronnie only has one. lol


Hulkster/Pumpster

[NarcissisticDeity]

Ronnie's back never looked like this , ever

[NeoSeminole]

Ronnie's back never looked like this , ever

that's not even a mandatory pose. But if you insist, Ronnie's back looked just as detailed and even thicker.

[Mr.1derful]

that's not even a mandatory pose. But if you insist, Ronnie's back looked just not as detailed and narrower even thicker.

[NeoSeminole]

I wish I had the DVD screen cap of this pic.

[d0nny2600]

Why are his panties stuck up his ass?