Author Topic: 3 Best Backs in the HISTORY OF THE SPORT  (Read 80685 times)

NeoSeminole

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5589
  • Ronnie > Dorian
Re: 3 Best Backs in the HISTORY OF THE SPORT
« Reply #450 on: December 03, 2008, 10:59:04 AM »
Why are his panties stuck up his ass?

maybe he likes the way it feels? Why don't you e-mail Ronnie for an answer? ???

d0nny2600

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4429
  • http://i.imgur.com/mCzI3N5.jpg
Re: 3 Best Backs in the HISTORY OF THE SPORT
« Reply #451 on: December 03, 2008, 11:03:10 AM »
maybe he likes the way it feels? Why don't you e-mail Ronnie for an answer? ???
Meltdown

NeoSeminole

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5589
  • Ronnie > Dorian
Re: 3 Best Backs in the HISTORY OF THE SPORT
« Reply #452 on: December 03, 2008, 11:12:04 AM »
Meltdown

yeah, okay. There was nothing abusive or instigating about my post.

Mr.1derful

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4941
Re: 3 Best Backs in the HISTORY OF THE SPORT
« Reply #453 on: December 03, 2008, 11:59:14 AM »
that's not even a mandatory pose. But if you insist, Ronnie's back looked just as less detailed and even thicker not as dense or wide.



Around the same approximate competitive time period as the pic you posted and it shows that Ronnie is out of his league.  You opened the door and once again it gets closed in your face. Thanks again for playing.  Please try again.


NeoSeminole

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5589
  • Ronnie > Dorian
Re: 3 Best Backs in the HISTORY OF THE SPORT
« Reply #454 on: December 03, 2008, 12:03:51 PM »
what is a pic of a prime Dorian standing next to a juvenile Ronnie supposed to prove? ???

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83178
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: 3 Best Backs in the HISTORY OF THE SPORT
« Reply #455 on: December 03, 2008, 12:45:01 PM »
that's not even a mandatory pose. But if you insist, Ronnie's back looked just as detailed and even thicker.


Just as detailed ? lmfao his x-mass tree is NO WHERE near as defined and razor sharp as Dorian and he looks thicker?  ???  ???  ???  ??? where? sorry kid but now I'm beginning to understand why you think he's better than Yates , you see things that aren't there

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83178
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: 3 Best Backs in the HISTORY OF THE SPORT
« Reply #456 on: December 03, 2008, 12:47:36 PM »
;) ;) ;)


His back is huge and smooth compared to Dorian and it lacks Yates' type detail this pics are proof yet again of when Ronnie became heavier everything fell apart in terms of balance & proportion , density & detail

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83178
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: 3 Best Backs in the HISTORY OF THE SPORT
« Reply #457 on: December 03, 2008, 12:56:11 PM »
what is a pic of a prime Dorian standing next to a juvenile Ronnie supposed to prove? ???

That's 1996 which is NOT Dorian's prime  ;) and Ronnie was 250 pounds in 1996 almost the exact same weight as he was at the 2001 Arnold Classic

What this pic proves is , no matter how much weight Ronnie would put on his traps would never be as big as Dorian's , his teres & infraspinatus would never be as big as Dorians , his lats would never insert as low as Dorians , it also proves how small Ronnie's torso is compared to Dorians , unlike your fantasy comparison pics where the have the same length torsos lol and lats and calves

Dorian is just 7 pounds heavier than Ronnie and his back is noticeably wider , thicker and bigger overall , so to say Ronnie's back at almost the same weight ( 2001 ASC ) is thicker & wider than Dorians at 257/260/269 lbs respectively is retarded an flat out wrong



Mr.1derful

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4941
Re: 3 Best Backs in the HISTORY OF THE SPORT
« Reply #458 on: December 03, 2008, 02:37:55 PM »
Dole out all the 2003 pics you want Neo.  In fact, here is the vid.  Yes, Ronnie is huge, no doubt.  However, Yates' conditioning blows him right out of the water.  It isn't even close.  Ronnie looks several weeks out from the contest and several months into his pregnancy.  Meanwhile, Yates looks polished and extremely conditioned with a professional posing routine befitting of a champion.  Not this "raise the roof" crap, with his trunks pulled right up his ass.









NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83178
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: 3 Best Backs in the HISTORY OF THE SPORT
« Reply #459 on: December 03, 2008, 02:43:32 PM »
Dole out all the 2003 pics you want Neo.  In fact, here is the vid.  Yes, Ronnie is huge, no doubt.  However, Yates' conditioning blows him right out of the water.  It isn't even close.  Ronnie looks several weeks out from the contest and several months into his pregnancy.  Meanwhile, Yates looks polished and extremely conditioned with a professional posing routine befitting of a champion.  Not this "raise the roof" crap, with his trunks pulled right up his ass.










He really does make Ronnie look soft

Mr.1derful

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4941
Re: 3 Best Backs in the HISTORY OF THE SPORT
« Reply #460 on: December 03, 2008, 02:48:35 PM »
He really does make Ronnie look soft
VERY!   

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83178
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: 3 Best Backs in the HISTORY OF THE SPORT
« Reply #461 on: December 03, 2008, 07:30:46 PM »
[ Q ] So you were aiming for optimal conditioning and the size you were able to maintain pre-contest was a natural consequence of the training you did in the final months and weeks leading into the show?
dots

      I trained for size in the off-season, but when it came time to get ready for a contest it was all about coming in shredded. The glutes must be striated, with the lower back shredded, no water anywhere, no loose skin. Like you are covered in cling-film.


Hulkster , Neo what was that about ' loose skin ' ?

lmfao

I own all of you

Mr.1derful

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4941
Re: 3 Best Backs in the HISTORY OF THE SPORT
« Reply #462 on: December 03, 2008, 08:06:33 PM »
In response to the comparison posting of videos of the much maligned 1995 Yates and the much heralded 2003 Ronnie, all I hear are crickets.  ND, is this the point where we say "check" or "checkmate"?

J Grey

  • Guest
Re: 3 Best Backs in the HISTORY OF THE SPORT
« Reply #463 on: December 03, 2008, 09:34:30 PM »
[ Q ] So you were aiming for optimal conditioning and the size you were able to maintain pre-contest was a natural consequence of the training you did in the final months and weeks leading into the show?
dots

      I trained for size in the off-season, but when it came time to get ready for a contest it was all about coming in shredded. The glutes must be striated, with the lower back shredded, no water anywhere, no loose skin. Like you are covered in cling-film.


Hulkster , Neo what was that about ' loose skin ' ?

lmfao

I own all of you

not only that but Dorian had super thin skin, which helped along his grainy look
not Jay Cutler 2 inch thick skin  :-X

Mr.1derful

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4941
Re: 3 Best Backs in the HISTORY OF THE SPORT
« Reply #464 on: December 04, 2008, 07:32:24 AM »
Looks like Dorian has silenced his critics once again. After his retirement, fans became too accustomed to the substandard conditioning of subsequent champions.  The pairing of the two videos above expose Ronnie's soft conditioning and invalidates the farcical claims of his having raised the bar.  In fact, it is apparent that if anything, Ronnie lowered it.  In terms of Ronnie's posing routine, it can only be described as an utter embarrassment.

NeoSeminole

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5589
  • Ronnie > Dorian
Re: 3 Best Backs in the HISTORY OF THE SPORT
« Reply #465 on: December 04, 2008, 08:42:47 AM »
Looks like Dorian has silenced his critics once again. After his retirement, fans became too accustomed to the substandard conditioning of subsequent champions.  The pairing of the two videos above expose Ronnie's soft conditioning and invalidates the farcical claims of his having raised the bar.  In fact, it is apparent that if anything, Ronnie lowered it.  In terms of Ronnie's posing routine, it can only be described as an utter embarrassment.

;) ;) ;)



The 20 best backs of all time - Flex, March 2008

20. albert beckles
19. melvin anthony
18. thierry pastel
17. tony pearson
16. sergio oliva
15. orville burke
14. art atwood
13. flex wheeler
12. robby robinson
11. mohamed benaziza
10. victor martinez
9. michael francois
8. samir bannout
7. jean-pierre fux
6. jay cutler
5. franco columbu
4. lee haney
3. joel stubbs
2. dorian yates
1. ronnie coleman

jaejonna

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 14944
  • Head Asian of Getbig
Re: 3 Best Backs in the HISTORY OF THE SPORT
« Reply #466 on: December 04, 2008, 08:47:37 AM »


20. albert beckles
19. melvin anthony ::)
18. thierry pastel
17. tony pearson
16. sergio oliva
15. orville burke
14. art atwood
13. flex wheeler
12. robby robinson
11. mohamed benaziza
10. victor martinez
9. michael francois
8. samir bannout
7. jean-pierre fux
6. jay cutler ::)
5. franco columbu
4. lee haney
3. joel stubbs
2. dorian yates
1. ronnie coleman
L

Mr.1derful

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4941
Re: 3 Best Backs in the HISTORY OF THE SPORT
« Reply #467 on: December 04, 2008, 10:34:29 AM »
Dole out all the 2003 pics you want Neo.  In fact, here is the vid.  Yes, Ronnie is huge, no doubt.  However, Yates' conditioning blows him right out of the water.  It isn't even close.  Ronnie looks several weeks out from the contest and several months into his pregnancy.  Meanwhile, Yates looks polished and extremely conditioned with a professional posing routine befitting of a champion.  Not this "raise the roof" crap, with his trunks pulled right up his ass.







Still nothing from the peanut gallery on the above videos.  Still much too afraid to confront the truth!


NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83178
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: 3 Best Backs in the HISTORY OF THE SPORT
« Reply #468 on: December 04, 2008, 10:42:43 AM »
In response to the comparison posting of videos of the much maligned 1995 Yates and the much heralded 2003 Ronnie, all I hear are crickets.  ND, is this the point where we say "check" or "checkmate"?

It's check mate lol

m8

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 10796
Re: 3 Best Backs in the HISTORY OF THE SPORT
« Reply #469 on: December 04, 2008, 10:46:53 AM »
what is a pic of a prime Dorian standing next to a juvenile Ronnie supposed to prove? ???

ha ha, "juvenile" when there's only a 2 years difference between the two. if anything it should favour Ronnie.

pumpster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 18890
  • If you're reading this you have too much free time
Re: 3 Best Backs in the HISTORY OF THE SPORT
« Reply #470 on: December 04, 2008, 10:49:03 AM »
Still nothing from the peanut gallery on the above videos.  Still much too afraid to confront the truth!



Gross pretty much covers it. Schwarzenegger said same, Yates isn't BB.

Mr.1derful

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4941
Re: 3 Best Backs in the HISTORY OF THE SPORT
« Reply #471 on: December 04, 2008, 10:52:30 AM »
Gross pretty much covers it.

Agreed.  I too was rather put off by Ronnie's posing routine.  Disgusting, unprofessional and not befitting of a true champion.  An utter embarrassment!  Not to mention his poor conditioning.

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83178
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: 3 Best Backs in the HISTORY OF THE SPORT
« Reply #472 on: December 04, 2008, 10:55:35 AM »
Gross pretty much covers it. Schwarzenegger said same, Yates isn't BB.

stop making up lies , Arnold bitched there were no personalities in the sport and he complained about the way the guys dressed , he also said Yates didn't do enough to promote the sport and he took back off to England after he won , Arnold was out of touch

make your case but to lie in order to do it

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83178
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: 3 Best Backs in the HISTORY OF THE SPORT
« Reply #473 on: December 04, 2008, 10:56:28 AM »
not only that but Dorian had super thin skin, which helped along his grainy look
not Jay Cutler 2 inch thick skin  :-X

Hey someone who gets it

NeoSeminole

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5589
  • Ronnie > Dorian
Re: 3 Best Backs in the HISTORY OF THE SPORT
« Reply #474 on: December 04, 2008, 11:03:37 AM »
ha ha, "juvenile" when there's only a 2 years difference between the two. if anything it should favour Ronnie.

what does age have to do with anything? This discussion is about whose back was better at their respective primes - not whose back was better during Dorian's prime. Ronnie didn't reach his peak until 5-7 yrs later.