Author Topic: 3 Best Backs in the HISTORY OF THE SPORT  (Read 80942 times)

NeoSeminole

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5589
  • Ronnie > Dorian
Re: 3 Best Backs in the HISTORY OF THE SPORT
« Reply #725 on: March 16, 2009, 07:10:20 AM »
Ronnie >>> Dorian





countdown to the excuses... 3... 2... 1... ;)

England_1

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2132
Re: 3 Best Backs in the HISTORY OF THE SPORT
« Reply #726 on: March 16, 2009, 07:37:28 AM »
LMFAO. Ronnie's forearms are twice as long as Dorian's. Your comparisons are retarded. Dorian killed Ronnie every time they competed and Ron was closer to his prime than Dorian in 96, 97!!!
Team Yates

QuakerOats

  • Time Out
  • Getbig V
  • *
  • Posts: 13621
  • bring amberlamps!!!
Re: 3 Best Backs in the HISTORY OF THE SPORT
« Reply #727 on: March 16, 2009, 07:39:10 AM »
Ronnie >>> Dorian





countdown to the excuses... 3... 2... 1... ;)
hahahahaha, also contdown to the "you had to see him in person, pictures don't do him justice".....3......2.......1. ::)

NeoSeminole

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5589
  • Ronnie > Dorian
Re: 3 Best Backs in the HISTORY OF THE SPORT
« Reply #728 on: March 16, 2009, 07:50:42 AM »
LMFAO. Ronnie's forearms are twice as long as Dorian's. Your comparisons are retarded. Dorian killed Ronnie every time they competed and Ron was closer to his prime than Dorian in 96, 97!!!

Dorian is bending his forearms away from the camera, you idiot. If I scaled their forearms to be the same length, then Dorian's head would be twice the size of Ronnie's. ::)

QuakerOats

  • Time Out
  • Getbig V
  • *
  • Posts: 13621
  • bring amberlamps!!!
Re: 3 Best Backs in the HISTORY OF THE SPORT
« Reply #729 on: March 16, 2009, 07:57:47 AM »
Dorian is bending his forearms away from the camera, you idiot. If I scaled their forearms to be the same length, then Dorian's head would be twice the size of Ronnie's. ::)
HAHAHAHA, i love how these clowns can ignore the visual evidence that's staring them right in the face and still come up with excuses. ::)

BIG_STI

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2596
  • www.illpumpyouup.com/
Re: 3 Best Backs in the HISTORY OF THE SPORT
« Reply #730 on: March 16, 2009, 08:05:25 AM »
Yates is dominating in this thread.

El Diablo Blanco

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 31841
  • Nom Nom Nom Nom
Re: 3 Best Backs in the HISTORY OF THE SPORT
« Reply #731 on: March 16, 2009, 08:09:30 AM »
hahahahaha, also contdown to the "you had to see him in person, pictures don't do him justice".....3......2.......1. ::)

Coleman's back is SICK!  HOLY FUCKTARD THAT IS THICK

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83179
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: 3 Best Backs in the HISTORY OF THE SPORT
« Reply #732 on: March 16, 2009, 01:36:28 PM »
I didn't comment on them b/c your comparisons are shit. They seriously look like a baboon with a mallet and a computer made them.

Ronnie's legs looked smaller at the 01 ASC. That's how I know. And I didn't say his legs were smaller, therefore his back must be wider. Learn to pay attention, dipshit. You asked me how his back could be wider if he weighed the same both years. I gave you a plausible reason.

yawn, I never said a larger back is better than a more defined back. I said a larger back is better if the difference in size > the difference in definition. Ronnie's back in 03 was just as big, if not bigger, and more defined than an off season Dorian. Nice try, though. ;)

???

you need to go back and read the issue of Flex with the 05 Mr. Olympia coverage. Samir didn't compete in the challenge round, idiot. He was one of the ex-Olympia judges for the challenge round. I'm not talking about winning or losing points. Ronnie and Gustavo were tied at the end. So they had a posedown to decide a winner. Samir picked Gustavo over Ronnie even though Gustavo only came in 3rd at the actual Mr. Olympia.

I can't prove a negative since it never happened. The burden lies on you to show where Ronnie explicitly said Dorian has the best back ever.

yes

Quote
I didn't comment on them b/c your comparisons are shit. They seriously look like a baboon with a mallet and a computer made them.

the irony of YOU of all people commenting on someone's comparisons looking like shit , seriously.

Quote
Ronnie's legs looked smaller at the 01 ASC. That's how I know. And I didn't say his legs were smaller, therefore his back must be wider. Learn to pay attention, dipshit. You asked me how his back could be wider if he weighed the same both years. I gave you a plausible reason.

Ronnie's legs look smaller to you , they don't look smaller to me so in fact you don't know you're winging it as usual you make these stupid assertions and offer up not one shred of evidence just your guess  ::) and you did claim his legs are smaller so his back is thicker and wider despite being the same weight

His legs were smaller and his conditioning was slightly better at the 01 ASC, which means he carried more muscle in his upper body.


and you've still yet to explain how his conditioning was slighting better , more bullshit on your behalf there is NOTHING ' plausible ' about your guesses and what the fuck do you know about conditioning anyway? you're the same dummy who claims there is no way Dorian is harder & drier than Ronnie despite proof to the contrary so when you say someone is wider and or better conditioned as usual you don't know what you're talking about


Quote
yawn, I never said a larger back is better than a more defined back. I said a larger back is better if the difference in size > the difference in definition. Ronnie's back in 03 was just as big, if not bigger, and more defined than an off season Dorian. Nice try, though. ;)

That's once again YOUR interpretation of what is better and spoken like a true fan boy a bigger softer less detailed back is better than a smaller one albeit harder , drier and more detailed , soft size doesn't trump the total package , again more just utter nonsense backed up with NOTHING but your fan-boy opinion , again you claim things but have no proof what so ever , Ronnie's back 03 was just as big if not bigger and more defined than Dorian offseason LMFAO how the fuck do you know? you don't know as usual keep fantasizing



Quote
you need to go back and read the issue of Flex with the 05 Mr. Olympia coverage. Samir didn't compete in the challenge round, idiot. He was one of the ex-Olympia judges for the challenge round. I'm not talking about winning or losing points. Ronnie and Gustavo were tied at the end. So they had a posedown to decide a winner. Samir picked Gustavo over Ronnie even though Gustavo only came in 3rd at the actual Mr. Olympia.

No shit he didn't compete it's called a typo idiot , again the point still stands you brag about how Samir's not as competent as a Flex writer when in fact he was a writer for Flex so your original statement means nothing , Samir's opinion how who has the best back is just as valid as Greg Merrit if not more so seeing he was a paid writer for Flex and he's a Mr Olympia with an outstanding back to boot , you needing an angle are trying to discredit him  ::) because of the challenge round

Quote
I can't prove a negative since it never happened. The burden lies on you to show where Ronnie explicitly said Dorian has the best back ever.

your game of semantics is old and tired seriously you bore me with the game playing , he conceded in 03 Dorian's back was the thickest he's even seen him included , you make an assertion which is based purely on fan-boy worship and your own hero kicks your ass concerning it and you dismiss him as an idiot or wrong and your somehow right lol what does it say when number 1 on Flex's best back list says number 2 has the thickest and freakiest back he's ever seen?  ;) and what about when Flex says Dorian has the greatest back of the 20th century INCLUDING Ronnie Coleman himself ? it says your shit out of luck as usual


NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83179
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: 3 Best Backs in the HISTORY OF THE SPORT
« Reply #733 on: March 16, 2009, 01:39:23 PM »
Ronnie >>> Dorian





countdown to the excuses... 3... 2... 1... ;)

LMFAO I always cringe when you post those , you're such a tool trying to pass these off as ' proof ' this is the reality of the situation kid

QuakerOats

  • Time Out
  • Getbig V
  • *
  • Posts: 13621
  • bring amberlamps!!!
Re: 3 Best Backs in the HISTORY OF THE SPORT
« Reply #734 on: March 16, 2009, 01:41:01 PM »
the funny thing is that Dorian is still getting killed in the shot you post, arms are half the size and Ronnie's back is still bigger and more detailed not to mention his legs are much better. ::)

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83179
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: 3 Best Backs in the HISTORY OF THE SPORT
« Reply #735 on: March 16, 2009, 01:41:42 PM »
LMFAO. Ronnie's forearms are twice as long as Dorian's. Your comparisons are retarded. Dorian killed Ronnie every time they competed and Ron was closer to his prime than Dorian in 96, 97!!!

lmfao This kid is such a fucking fan-boy it's not even funny lol Dorian kicked Ronnie's ass for years and this is the only way he's gonna beat Dorian in fantasy fan-boy comparisons

this is reality

BIG_STI

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2596
  • www.illpumpyouup.com/
Re: 3 Best Backs in the HISTORY OF THE SPORT
« Reply #736 on: March 16, 2009, 03:49:53 PM »
the funny thing is that Dorian is still getting killed in the shot you post, arms are half the size and Ronnie's back is still bigger and more detailed not to mention his legs are much better. ::)

LOL you can't be serious?

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83179
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: 3 Best Backs in the HISTORY OF THE SPORT
« Reply #737 on: March 16, 2009, 04:53:28 PM »
LOL you can't be serious?

I honestly don't think he is , he's just being contrary

NeoSeminole

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5589
  • Ronnie > Dorian
Re: 3 Best Backs in the HISTORY OF THE SPORT
« Reply #738 on: March 16, 2009, 06:22:19 PM »
the irony of YOU of all people commenting on someone's comparisons looking like shit , seriously.

oh really? Grow a brain, idiot. ::)

here are my comparisons








here are yours



I cut out the image of Dorian you used and compared it to the original pic.



suddenly Dorian is 4-5" taller than Ronnie. Note how Dorian's feet are cut off. ::)



notice how Ronnie's head changes shape in one comparison to the next.




NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83179
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: 3 Best Backs in the HISTORY OF THE SPORT
« Reply #739 on: March 16, 2009, 06:25:30 PM »
oh really? Grow up, idiot. ::)


Neo , I explained to you before I just started doing it and stopped because they weren't coming out any good , the difference between you and I is , I don't keep posting them YOU do .

your comparisons are a JOKE for the many reasons I've explained , keep posting them and I'll keep laughing at them  ;D

NeoSeminole

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5589
  • Ronnie > Dorian
Re: 3 Best Backs in the HISTORY OF THE SPORT
« Reply #740 on: March 16, 2009, 06:39:55 PM »
Ronnie's legs look smaller to you , they don't look smaller to me so in fact you don't know you're winging it as usual you make these stupid assertions and offer up not one shred of evidence just your guess

I don't know what to tell you other than you're blind. :-\ Ronnie's back improved from 98 to 01.





Quote
and you've still yet to explain how his conditioning was slighting better , more bullshit on your behalf there is NOTHING ' plausible ' about your guesses and what the fuck do you know about conditioning anyway? you're the same dummy who claims there is no way Dorian is harder & drier than Ronnie despite proof to the contrary so when you say someone is wider and or better conditioned as usual you don't know what you're talking about

Ronnie had more detail at the 01 ASC and numerous quotes from experts who saw him in person agree.

Quote
That's once again YOUR interpretation of what is better and spoken like a true fan boy a bigger softer less detailed back is better than a smaller one albeit harder , drier and more detailed , soft size doesn't trump the total package , again more just utter nonsense backed up with NOTHING but your fan-boy opinion , again you claim things but have no proof what so ever , Ronnie's back 03 was just as big if not bigger and more defined than Dorian offseason LMFAO how the fuck do you know? you don't know as usual keep fantasizing

ha ha ha, how does making a factual comment make me a fanboy? I'd love to hear your explanation.

Quote
No shit he didn't compete it's called a typo idiot,

oh please, you made a mistake and somehow that makes me an idiot? How old are you?

Quote
again the point still stands you brag about how Samir's not as competent as a Flex writer when in fact he was a writer for Flex so your original statement means nothing , Samir's opinion how who has the best back is just as valid as Greg Merrit if not more so seeing he was a paid writer for Flex and he's a Mr Olympia with an outstanding back to boot , you needing an angle are trying to discredit him because of the challenge round

your point doesn't stand. Samir proved he is incompetent to judge physiques when he chose the 3rd place guy over 1st place. Wtf makes you think he should have any say in a discussion about best back ever? Oh right, b/c he once had a great back. Brilliant logic there, dumbass! ::)

Quote
your game of semantics is old and tired seriously you bore me with the game playing , he conceded in 03 Dorian's back was the thickest he's even seen him included , you make an assertion which is based purely on fan-boy worship and your own hero kicks your ass concerning it and you dismiss him as an idiot or wrong and your somehow right lol what does it say when number 1 on Flex's best back list says number 2 has the thickest and freakiest back he's ever seen? and what about when Flex says Dorian has the greatest back of the 20th century INCLUDING Ronnie Coleman himself ? it says your shit out of luck as usual

yawn, I'm still waiting for you to show me where Ronnie said Dorian has the best back of all-time. All I see is a comment where Ronnie praises Dorian's thickness. Nowhere did he mention definition, symmetry, taper, and fullness.

NeoSeminole

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5589
  • Ronnie > Dorian
Re: 3 Best Backs in the HISTORY OF THE SPORT
« Reply #741 on: March 16, 2009, 06:46:32 PM »
Neo , I explained to you before I just started doing it and stopped because they weren't coming out any good , the difference between you and I is , I don't keep posting them YOU do .

your comparisons are a JOKE for the many reasons I've explained , keep posting them and I'll keep laughing at them

stop with the bullshit excuses. Your comparisons still suck 10x worse than mine. You posted the following in this thread to 'prove' that Ronnie's back didn't improve from 98 to 01. I see right through your childish antics.




NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83179
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: 3 Best Backs in the HISTORY OF THE SPORT
« Reply #742 on: March 16, 2009, 07:04:00 PM »
I don't know what to tell you other than you're blind. :-\ Ronnie's back improved from 98 to 01.



Ronnie had more detail at the 01 ASC and numerous quotes from experts who saw him in person agree.

ha ha ha, how does making a factual comment make me a fanboy? I'd love to hear your explanation.

oh please, you made a mistake and somehow that makes me an idiot? How old are you?

your point doesn't stand. Samir proved he is incompetent to judge physiques when he chose the 3rd place guy over 1st place. Wtf makes you think he should have any say in a discussion about best back ever? Oh right, b/c he once had a great back. Brilliant logic there, dumbass! ::)

yawn, I'm still waiting for you to show me where Ronnie said Dorian has the best back of all-time. All I see is a comment where Ronnie praises Dorian's thickness. Nowhere did he mention definition, symmetry, taper, and fullness.

Quote
I don't know what to tell you other than you're blind. :-\ Ronnie's back improved from 98 to 01.

I disagree and your pictures means nothing and I'll show you why at the bottom

Quote
Ronnie had more detail at the 01 ASC and numerous quotes from experts who saw him in person agree.

more detail than 1998? says who? where?

Quote
ha ha ha, how does making a factual comment make me a fanboy? I'd love to hear your explanation.

lol ' factual '  ::) it's factual because you say it is

Quote
oh please, you made a mistake and somehow that makes me an idiot? How old are you?

because we both know it's a typo but you went along with it anyway , get serious

Quote
your point doesn't stand. Samir proved he is incompetent to judge physiques when he chose the 3rd place guy over 1st place. Wtf makes you think he should have any say in a discussion about best back ever? Oh right, b/c he once had a great back. Brilliant logic there, dumbass! ::)

Oh boy he's not a competent judge because he didn't put Ronnie in first place in the sudden death match? Ronnie and Baddell were six for six and Badell edged him out in the final does that mean he should have won the whole contest? NO again one can loose poses and still win a contest , that's like saying the regular judges aren't fit to judge a contest because Judge A had Ronnie in 3rd in 1998 even though he won , that's NOT how it works , they throw out the highs & lows please learn how contests are judged , and again Samir was a paid writer for Flex magazine so to say he's not as qualified to judge a contest compared to someone who is is just nonsense

Quote
yawn, I'm still waiting for you to show me where Ronnie said Dorian has the best back of all-time. All I see is a comment where Ronnie praises Dorian's thickness. Nowhere did he mention definition, symmetry, taper, and fullness.

go play your semantics games somewhere else , your nonsense is boring , another Ronnie pro-Yates quote you can't deal with so you'll harp on language , lets just supplement Ronnie's quote with the many who already say Dorian's back is better and once again you have your own hero bowing down to Dorian yet again


NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83179
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: 3 Best Backs in the HISTORY OF THE SPORT
« Reply #743 on: March 16, 2009, 07:06:51 PM »
stop with the bullshit excuses. Your comparisons still suck 10x worse than mine. You posted the following in this thread to 'prove' that Ronnie's back didn't improve from 98 to 01. I see right through your childish antics.





10X worse LMFAO sure ya right and again dummy I haven't posted them in eons YOU keep posting that fucking garbage  , kid run along and play now , go back and make more fantasy comparisons lmfao improved by 2001? over 1998/1999? I think not

Hulkster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22972
  • ND ran away from me
Re: 3 Best Backs in the HISTORY OF THE SPORT
« Reply #744 on: March 16, 2009, 07:18:00 PM »
Quote
Ronnie had more detail at the 01 ASC and numerous quotes from experts who saw him in person agree.

more detail than 1998? says who? where?

ND you can see it right here: Ronnie's back did NOT look this good in 1998.

no way in hell:

Flower Boy Ran Away

ironneck

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 14419
  • team young getbiggers
Re: 3 Best Backs in the HISTORY OF THE SPORT
« Reply #745 on: March 16, 2009, 07:27:14 PM »
oh boy it starts again
i didn't want to click on this thread but did and i see what i expected

NeoSeminole

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5589
  • Ronnie > Dorian
Re: 3 Best Backs in the HISTORY OF THE SPORT
« Reply #746 on: March 16, 2009, 07:32:20 PM »
ND is fun to watch meltdown b/c he makes less and less sense. ;D

IceCold

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4878
  • Getbig!
Re: 3 Best Backs in the HISTORY OF THE SPORT
« Reply #747 on: March 16, 2009, 09:50:54 PM »
just like ronnie said, yates has the best back ever.


yates has thicker traps and better lower lat insertions.






R.I.P. DIMEBAG DARRELL ABBOTT (1966-2004)

suckmymuscle

  • Guest
Re: 3 Best Backs in the HISTORY OF THE SPORT
« Reply #748 on: March 17, 2009, 06:43:25 AM »
the funny thing is that Dorian is still getting killed in the shot you post, arms are half the size and Ronnie's back is still bigger and more detailed not to mention his legs are much better.

  Hm, no. Epic failure. I know that trailer trash guys like you can't afford glasses or contact lenses, but you really need them, dude. Seriously. I mean, you look at a picture where Dorian's back is clearly wider and more detailed and you claim the opposite. What am I supposed to reply to this?

SUCKMYMUSCLE

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83179
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: 3 Best Backs in the HISTORY OF THE SPORT
« Reply #749 on: March 17, 2009, 09:37:34 AM »
ND is fun to watch meltdown b/c he makes less and less sense. ;D

meltdown? when I call people a ' dirty mexican ' then you can say I'm melting down  ;) and I make less sense to you? because you don't have any , you'd have to know what you're talking about and I've established numerous times you simply don't