Author Topic: Greatest arms in the history of White bodybuilders (Read 24037 times)

Fatpanda · « **on:** November 30, 2008, 06:40:12 AM »

discuss

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #1 on:** November 30, 2008, 06:42:55 AM »

Quote from: Fatpanda on November 30, 2008, 06:40:12 AM

discuss

Hands down , lacks NOTHING he has biceps , triceps and FOREARMS

mesmorph78 · « **Reply #2 on:** November 30, 2008, 06:46:51 AM »

one of the greatest top 3 no doubt
short though .
i think colemans are better
but thats just preference..
could go either way

Fatpanda · « **Reply #3 on:** November 30, 2008, 06:54:30 AM »

Quote from: mesmorph78 on November 30, 2008, 06:46:51 AM

one of the greatest top 3 no doubt
short though .
i think colemans are better
but thats just preference..
could go either way

colemans tri's have been huge in the past, but not detailed. they have been vanishing slowly over time also

lee priests are huge and detailed.

mesmorph78 · « **Reply #4 on:** November 30, 2008, 07:07:00 AM »

true coleman trie arent as detailed as priests
but the are huuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuug e
..lees bi's arent as detailed and vascular as rons or as big..
and rons ars are overall bigger

turnerg31 · « **Reply #5 on:** November 30, 2008, 07:07:17 AM »

I think I have to agree with you on this one. Lee is the man when it comes to arms.

Pat

Fatpanda · « **Reply #6 on:** November 30, 2008, 07:08:53 AM »

sculpture · « **Reply #7 on:** November 30, 2008, 07:10:55 AM »

shortlist

ronnie coleman
lee priest
vince taylor
paull dillet
paul demayo
kevin levrone
paco bautista
dorian yates

theirry pastel
robby robinson
phil heath
j.d dawodu
marko savorlein (sp)

probs loads more too

Fatpanda · « **Reply #8 on:** November 30, 2008, 07:11:17 AM »

Fatpanda · « **Reply #9 on:** November 30, 2008, 07:13:15 AM »

Fatpanda · « **Reply #10 on:** November 30, 2008, 07:16:17 AM »

pretty good back too

Fatpanda · « **Reply #11 on:** November 30, 2008, 07:18:51 AM »

Fatpanda · « **Reply #12 on:** November 30, 2008, 07:21:13 AM »

Fatpanda · « **Reply #13 on:** November 30, 2008, 07:23:41 AM »

El_Pajero · « **Reply #14 on:** November 30, 2008, 07:25:17 AM »

Fatpanda, you accomplished to post 20 pics of Lee Priest, now try to post 3 of yourself, lets see how ripped and huge you are.

No no, make it 2 pics.

Fatpanda · « **Reply #15 on:** November 30, 2008, 07:26:08 AM »

Fatpanda · « **Reply #16 on:** November 30, 2008, 07:27:55 AM »

Fatpanda · « **Reply #17 on:** November 30, 2008, 07:30:39 AM »

Griffith · « **Reply #18 on:** November 30, 2008, 07:31:13 AM »

Fatpanda · « **Reply #19 on:** November 30, 2008, 07:32:49 AM »

amazing.

thoughts ?

L00n · « **Reply #20 on:** November 30, 2008, 07:33:08 AM »

phil heath ... others...

Fatpanda · « **Reply #21 on:** November 30, 2008, 07:34:00 AM »

Quote from: Griffith on November 30, 2008, 07:31:13 AM

negro please

pumpster · « **Reply #22 on:** November 30, 2008, 07:35:47 AM »

Quote from: danielson on November 30, 2008, 06:43:38 AM

They are too short though. I bet he can't even put a hat on his own head.

Priest's arms are STUBBY.

Coleman had at least the same relative size plus far better peak and detail.

Fatpanda · « **Reply #23 on:** November 30, 2008, 07:38:14 AM »

Quote from: pumpster on November 30, 2008, 07:35:47 AM

STUBBY, plus never had a great peak or these cuts and refinement.

yes ronnies were massive, but his tri's have vanished the past few years due to injury

pumpster · « **Reply #24 on:** November 30, 2008, 07:39:58 AM »

Quote from: Fatpanda on November 30, 2008, 07:38:14 AM

yes ronnies were massive, but his tri's have vanished the past few years due to injury

Sure but no one stays great forever. If it's best all-time..

The relative size here is at least that of Priest, humungous with more detail and without Priest's stubbiness.