The final chapter to the Ronnie Vs Dorian saga.

[THEBOSS]

Brutal child-like over-simplification and adherence to IFBB contest placing brainwashing.

Actually it looks like even in the mid-90s it was the keg being crushed against a still-improving Coleman, except on judge's "scoring".

RONNI couldnt win shit until the shadow retired ! Swing off RONs sack all you want ! this is a fact !

[THEBOSS]

No, the end of the story came 8 Sandows later

And he couldnt win even ONE while DORIAN was around ! End of the debate !

[no one]

you guys need to get a life.

[turner98]

All nuggets

[prof]

WOW brutal evidence of NOTHING Dorian way off to the left and Ronnie closer to the camera to the right lol same contest YOU have no excuses now 

You complain about the other pic, but here Dorian is closer to the camera, and Ronnie is turned to the right. 

[NarcissisticDeity]

You complain about the other pic, but here Dorian is closer to the camera, and Ronnie is turned to the right. 

No he's not and they're side-by-side not one end or the other

[prof]

No he's not and they're side-by-side not one end or the other

Look at the pic, Ronnie is turned to the right (you can see the left side of his stomach).  That would shorten the width of his back a little.

Plus, regardless of angle, Dorian is getting owned here:

[NarcissisticDeity]

Look at the pic, Ronnie is turned to the right (you can see the left side of his stomach).  That would shorten the width of his back a little.

Plus, regardless of angle, Dorian is getting owned here:

No he's not He's not holding his lats like Ronnie , Ronnie his his forward and Dorian doesn't and Dorian is all the way to the left that's not accurate

[NeoSeminole]

No he's not He's not holding his lats like Ronnie , Ronnie his his forward and Dorian doesn't and Dorian is all the way to the left that's not accurate

stop making excuses. Both are sharing the same stage and hitting the same pose. Ronnie is clearly matching Dorian in width and surpasses him in thickness and taper.

[NarcissisticDeity]

stop making excuses. Both are sharing the same stage and hitting the same pose. Ronnie is clearly matching Dorian in width and surpasses him in thickness and taper.

You're fucking high if you think he surpasses this in thickness among the dumbest things you've ever typed in your GetBig history

night & day Thickness , Density , Detail and width NO CONTEST Dorian is vastly superior

[NeoSeminole]

You're fucking high if you think he surpasses this in thickness among the dumbest things you've ever typed in your GetBig history

I can't tell if you're joking or not. Ronnie's back is thicker in your comparison.

[NarcissisticDeity]

I can't tell if you're joking or not. Ronnie's back is thicker in your comparison.

Only a complete fool would claim so , Ronnie's back isn't thicker ANYWHERE not the traps , not the lats , not the teres , not the infraspinatus , not the spinal erctors not the lumbar NO WHERE especially not 1996

it's not open for discussion , and this isn't even Dorian at his biggest or best

[NeoSeminole]

Only a complete fool would claim so , Ronnie's back isn't thicker ANYWHERE not the traps , not the lats , not the teres , not the infraspinatus , not the spinal erctors not the lumbar NO WHERE especially not 1996

look at the shadows in your pic, dipshit. Words are MEANINGLESS when the visual evidence doesn't back it up.

[NarcissisticDeity]

look at the shadows in your pic, dipshit. Words are MEANINGLESS when the visual evidence doesn't back it up.

You see what you want as usual. again you're insane if you think Coleman 1996 has a thicker back than Dorian it's lunacy , believe what you'd like but this is just another one of your insanely stupid comments

[NeoSeminole]

You see what you want as usual. again you're insane if you think Coleman 1996 has a thicker back than Dorian it's lunacy , believe what you'd like but this is just another one of your insanely stupid comments

no, I see what's in the pic. Ronnie's back is thicker. This isn't even up for debate. Seriously, what criteria are you using to gauge thickness in the pic you posted?

[NarcissisticDeity]

no, I see what's in the pic. Ronnie's back is thicker. This isn't even up for debate. Seriously, what criteria are you using to gauge thickness in the pic you posted?

NO , no you see what you want . and I love how you say it's not open for debate when in fact NO ONE was claiming Ronnie's back as anywhere near the best ever in 1996 and now you're re-writing history lol


what criteria and I using? for muscle thickness? depth , size and length of all of the back muscles equal the thicker back of the two

[NaturalWonder83]

wow alex is that your cell phone number?!!

[NeoSeminole]

NO , no you see what you want . and I love how you say it's not open for debate when in fact NO ONE was claiming Ronnie's back as anywhere near the best ever in 1996 and now you're re-writing history lol

yawn, and then you wonder why people say you cannot read.

Ronnie's back is thicker in your comparison.

look at the shadows in your pic, dipshit.

no, I see what's in the pic. Ronnie's back is thicker.

that's 3 times now I said Ronnie's back is thicker in the pic you posted. Nowhere did I claim that Ronnie had a better back in 96. I see what's in the pic unlike you who closes his eyes and regurgitates what he reads.

what criteria and I using? for muscle thickness? depth , size and length of all of the back muscles equal the thicker back of the two

now say that using proper grammar, you illiterate baboon.

[Emmortal]

You're fucking high if you think he surpasses this in thickness among the dumbest things you've ever typed in your GetBig history

night & day Thickness , Density , Detail and width NO CONTEST Dorian is vastly superior

Bad example Ronnie isn't finished with the pose and hasn't spread his lats out all the way.

[England_1]

Ronnie is fully posed here and looking like an infant next to Yates. Yates' back development is light years better. Ronnie has NO lower back development. Dorian's back is incredibly wider, thicker, and more defined.

[NeoSeminole]

Ronnie is fully posed here and looking like an infant next to Yates. Yates' back development is light years better. Ronnie has NO lower back development. Dorian's back is incredibly wider, thicker, and more defined.

here's another shot from the same contest, you dipshit. What makes more sense? Ronnie isn't fully flexing in your pic or his back magically shrunk?

[NarcissisticDeity]

yawn, and then you wonder why people say you cannot read.

that's 3 times now I said Ronnie's back is thicker in the pic you posted. Nowhere did I claim that Ronnie had a better back in 96. I see what's in the pic unlike you who closes his eyes and regurgitates what he reads.

now say that using proper grammar, you illiterate baboon.

Ohhh someone is getting testy lol I can read I told you before I don't hang onto your every word

and three times now I told you you're high if you think Ronnie's back is thicker . again you see what you want.

and I'm not illiterate.  I have a bad habit of multi-tasking and get distracted easily again I don't hang on your every word kid you got the gist of it . you're getting desperate again

[NarcissisticDeity]

Ronnie is fully posed here and looking like an infant next to Yates. Yates' back development is light years better. Ronnie has NO lower back development. Dorian's back is incredibly wider, thicker, and more defined.

right on the money and that's how Ronnie does is back double biceps shot , the difference in lat length , wdith and pure size is night & day , the thickness of Dorian's spinal erectors is in another league , the size , length and thickness of the traps is insane and the depth , detail and size of the teres & infraspinatus is before & after , Ronnie doesn't compare in the back department not in thickness , size , detail , width

there is NO debate

[Emmortal]

Ronnie is fully posed here and looking like an infant next to Yates. Yates' back development is light years better. Ronnie has NO lower back development. Dorian's back is incredibly wider, thicker, and more defined.

Sorry, this is wrong.  For one, again, Ronnie is not fully posed, it's quite clear he's not and saying he is isn't giving your argument credence, it's just showing that you're grasping for straws.  Secondly, Colemans spine is clearly much more arched pinching his lower lats and flaring his upper back more than Yates so again your comment about his lower back is invalid, especially when you look at other photos from the same contest.  There are obvious aspects of Dorian's back which are correct, such as the condition in the rhomboids being superior to Coleman, but saying "it's light years ahead" is just biased conjecture.

[England_1]

here's another shot from the same contest, you dipshit. What makes more sense? Ronnie isn't fully flexing in your pic or his back magically shrunk?

meltdown 

You prefer a blurry image from a mile away instead of a direct comparison up close showing Coleman being murdered.

And yet you can't even explain how Coleman finished behind Ray