The final chapter to the Ronnie Vs Dorian saga.

[pumpster]

More speculation on your behalf someone of us don't have to go on the training board and and try and defend the BowFlex

and I know anatomy more than you do , you keep posting shots of Dorian with a torn tricep as proof of how bad they are LMFAO

IN THAT CASE GET YOUR SKINNY ASS ON THE TRAINING FORUM TO SHARE SOME OF THE YEARS OF EXPERIENCE ON YOUR BOWFLEX HAHAAHAH

[NarcissisticDeity]

obviously you have been abscent from the board the last few days.

4 billion getbiggers have commented on that pic and all said the same thing.

its worked.

compare quads buddy: lol

LMFAO here he goes everyone says so it must be true

RETARD the front double biceps pic is from 1994 the front latspread 1995 ONE year apart

4 billion getbiggers all said it's not shopped and he beats anything Ronnie has shown

[mesmorph78]

colamans are bigger and have better shape....
granted... in the side tri its not as defined as dorians....
in regards to the heads...
but murders him on size and shape thats 2 points to one nd....
cmon man
like u admitted dorian has never been in a greatest are article or list...
so does that not hold any weight
.. the same guys u keep quoting... from magazines are the same ones who can never leave coleman out of a greatest arm list..
so .. why quote them on one thing ..
and them not regard the other...
.. cmon man....
 
i put to you dorian had some of the worst arms during the 90's
shawn dillet nasser kevin flex baker....
to name a few PWNED him in the arm department so how you leap frogged dorian over all those guys to compare his arms to coleman is laughable

[Hulkster]

RETARD the front double biceps pic is from 1994 the front latspread 1995 ONE year apart

yeah sure it is...

are you that dumb?

 

[NarcissisticDeity]

IN THAT CASE GET YOUR SKINNY ASS ON THE TRAINING FORUM TO SHARE SOME OF THE YEARS OF EXPERIENCE ON YOUR BOWFLEX HAHAAHAH

I never used the BowFlex , I would never use a BowFlex , they're useless for gaining any quality muscle when you show me a single professional bodybuilder who got his championship physique via BowFlex alone I'll entertain trying one until then I'll laugh at all the suckers who were duped by an infomercial , present company included

[pumpster]

STILL WAITING ON ND'S LIFTING PICS. WITHOUT PICS IT DIDN'T HAPPEN.

[NarcissisticDeity]

yeah sure it is...

are you that dumb?

 

epic denial lol I just showed you the original front double biceps shot scanned from the magazine 1994 Horton's new pic 1995

what a backfire  

[Hulkster]

look at the clear morph job of dorian's quads LOL

these pics are from the same shoot.

its clear as day - esp. the hair...

[NarcissisticDeity]

STILL WAITING ON ND'S LIFTING PICS. WITHOUT PICS IT DIDN'T HAPPEN.

Keep waiting , I'll post my pics as soon as you post your Bowflex body  

[NarcissisticDeity]

look at the clear morph job of dorian's quads LOL

these pics are from the same shoot.

its clear as day - esp. the hair...

Ha ha ha ha meltdown renaming the pic ' 1995 ' when I just proved to you it's NOT lmfao I called it before it happened that pic would cause many meltdowns

[ASJChaotic]

that's a great shot, end of story

[Mr.1derful]

The only response needed, to which the trolls have no answer.  Game Over.  Thanks for playing.  Please try again.

[Emmortal]

Those two pics are from the same shoot, there's no doubt about it.  Just look at the pattern on the background in relation to his bodyparts, they match up EXACTLY, not to mention the lighting is EXACTLY the same.   That's not going to happen putting someone in the exact same spot 1 year later and have the lighting exactly the same as well.  So someone is mistaken about when that shot was taken because they're from the same shoot.

[NarcissisticDeity]

Those two pics are from the same shoot, there's no doubt about it.  Just look at the pattern on the background in relation to his bodyparts, they match up EXACTLY, not to mention the lighting is EXACTLY the same.   That's not going to happen putting someone in the exact same spot 1 year later and have the lighting exactly the same as well.  So someone is mistaken about when that shot was taken because they're from the same shoot.

see conspiracy .

[Emmortal]

see conspiracy .

No conspiracy, just facts.  Just look at the pattern in the background, it's exactly the same, lighting is exactly the same.  That's not going to happen on 2 separate shoots 1 year apart.  The background is a draped patterned sheet, quite a common piece to use in a photo shoot.  It has to be hung up and placed on a frame to hold it in place.  There's no way  you're going to just happen to hang the drape EXACTLY the same way, down to the centimeter, as it was hung a year prior.  Sorry, but that's impossible.

[Mr.1derful]

In as much as the trolls attempt to belittle Dorian's physique, they must view him as a very credible threat to their hero.  Why else would they put forth so much effort in bashing Dorian?  If the new pic were really so unimpressive, as they would have people believe, the need to question the authenticity of it wouldn't be warranted.  The reality, however, is that they know full well that the new pic blows Ronnie away.  In failing to provide a substantive counter, they opt for the easy way out and make unsubstantiated claims of the photo having been altered.  A chicken shit maneuver.  

[NarcissisticDeity]

No conspiracy, just facts.  Just look at the pattern in the background, it's exactly the same, lighting is exactly the same.  That's not going to happen on 2 separate shoots 1 year apart.

The backround is the same , who knew a photographer might have the same backround   lighting is not the same , the photographer said specifically the front latspread shot is from 1995 and I proved what year the front double biceps is from , you see the same backround and try and put two and two together not how it works

his hair in 1995 looks different , much shorter and lighter on the sides than the 1994 pic if it was the exact same lighting and the same shoot they'd look exactly the same and they don't

[NarcissisticDeity]

In as much as the trolls attempt to belittle Dorian's physique, they must view him as a very credible threat to their hero.  Why else would they put forth so much effort in bashing Dorian?  If the new pic were really so unimpressive, as they would have people believe, the need to question the authenticity of it wouldn't be warranted.  The reality, however, is that they know full well that the new pic blows Ronnie away.  In failing to provide a substantive counter, they opt for the easy way out and make unsubstantiated claims of the photo having been altered.  A chicken shit maneuver.  

You're right , these guys brag and brag about how it's NO contest and Ronnie would destroy Dorian and they shouldn't even be mentioned in the same sentence together and we're all insane to think he would even stand a chance lol if that were the case the truce thread wouldn't be almost 1700 pages , they wouldn't follow me or anyone who types the word Dorian bashing him every shot they get , they know deep down Dorian is better and it kills them that their own hero said on multiple occasions he wouldn't beat Dorian lol they don;t get it , Ronnie does .

[Emmortal]

The backround is the same , who knew a photographer might have the same backround  lighting is not the same , the photographer said specifically the front latspread shot is from 1995 and I proved what year the front double biceps is from , you see the same backround and try and put two and two together not how it works

his hair in 1995 looks different , much shorter and lighter on the sides than the 1994 pic if it was the exact same lighting and the same shoot they'd look exactly the same and they don't

Are you that dense?  I'm not commenting about the background being the same, the PATTERN on the background is in the EXACT SAME position in both shots.  Impossible to do with something that has to be hung manually and set up 1 year apart.  Even if you were TRYING to make it look exactly the same matching the patterns position in relation to Yates it would VERY difficult if not impossible to do.  The lighting is indeed exactly the same, you're confusing the sepia tone and the black and white tone with different lighting, that has nothing to do with it.  The key, fill and bounce lights are all in the same position in both shots, there's no argument about that.

[bigguns23]

 

[pumpster]

I never used the BowFlex , I would never use a BowFlex , they're useless for gaining any quality muscle when you show me a single professional bodybuilder who got his championship physique via BowFlex alone I'll entertain trying one until then I'll laugh at all the suckers who were duped by an infomercial , present company included

Pics of U lifting otherwise it didn't happen ROFLMAO don't forget those training forum posts.

[NarcissisticDeity]

Are you that dense?  I'm not commenting about the background being the same, the PATTERN on the background is in the EXACT SAME position in both shots.  Impossible to do with something that has to be hung manually and set up 1 year apart.  Even if you were TRYING to make it look exactly the same matching the patterns position in relation to Yates it would VERY difficult if not impossible to do.  The lighting is indeed exactly the same, you're confusing the sepia tone and the black and white tone with different lighting, that has nothing to do with it.  The key, fill and bounce lights are all in the same position in both shots, there's no argument about that.

Sorry it doesn't look exactly the same to me ! and again you're implying Horton is lying about the pic and morphed it , you're reaching on both accounts

[Emmortal]

Sorry it doesn't look exactly the same to me ! and again you're implying Horton is lying about the pic and morphed it , you're reaching on both accounts

I'm not saying he's lying, it was from a shoot from over 10 years ago, people make mistakes and don't always remember exactly the way things happened.  Hell, ask me what I ate for dinner 2 weeks ago and I couldn't tell you.

[Hulkster]

and again you're implying Horton is lying about the pic and morphed it

why are you always putting words in people's mouths?

Horton could simply be mistaken about the year (not lying intentially) and the pic could have been morphed by someone else (like those who work on bb.com)

because your truly an idiot if you think these quads are not morphed:


you should know dorian's physique by now.

we all do.

compare again: its quite clear.

the two shots are clearly from the same shoot. the hair, the trunks, the lighting, the shadows the background etc

its all EXACTLY the same. EXACTLY. read that again.

its really stupid to try and argue otherwise.

[Hulkster]

if you look at the pattern that the draping makes, its even THE SAME by dorian's FEET for fuck's sake

you expect anyone to believe that happened BY CHANCE, 1 year apart?

please. you would have an easier time splitting the atom than to get that exactly the same 1 year later.

same with the hair.