« previous next »
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: Was Ronnie that far from the mark in 1997?  (Read 1764 times)

Danimal77

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7486
  • Yo Adrian
Was Ronnie that far from the mark in 1997?
« on: December 12, 2008, 05:04:40 PM »
Just watched his 1997 posing routine and I wonder if he was overlooked that year? http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=YHiiLBTaRCw&feature=related
Logged

Danimal77

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7486
  • Yo Adrian
Re: Was Ronnie that far from the mark in 1997?
« Reply #1 on: December 12, 2008, 05:07:34 PM »
Now just for fun, here he was at the 1994 Mr. Olympia: http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=G4xxXSY7fGc&feature=related  :-X
Logged

Wiggs

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 40808
  • Child of Y'srael
Re: Was Ronnie that far from the mark in 1997?
« Reply #2 on: December 12, 2008, 06:02:55 PM »
Quote from: Danimal77 on December 12, 2008, 05:07:34 PM
Now just for fun, here he was at the 1994 Mr. Olympia: http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=G4xxXSY7fGc&feature=related  :-X

I almost threw up in my mouth on that black stripper dancing.
Logged
7

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 79306
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Was Ronnie that far from the mark in 1997?
« Reply #3 on: December 12, 2008, 06:06:32 PM »


He was 255 pounds in 1997
Logged

tbombz

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 19350
  • Psalms 150
Re: Was Ronnie that far from the mark in 1997?
« Reply #4 on: December 12, 2008, 06:11:10 PM »
1:38-1:45

most beautiful lats
Logged

JimmyJam1974

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5779
  • "No sir, the ball ain't heavy." - Herschel Walker
Re: Was Ronnie that far from the mark in 1997?
« Reply #5 on: December 12, 2008, 07:03:55 PM »
Photo Shopped
Logged
U

Danimal77

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7486
  • Yo Adrian
Re: Was Ronnie that far from the mark in 1997?
« Reply #6 on: December 12, 2008, 10:22:51 PM »
Quote from: NarcissisticDeity on December 12, 2008, 06:06:32 PM


He was 255 pounds in 1997

That didn't answer my question though. Was he really that far from the mark? Meaning: Was he overlooked in 1997 and if so, why? I personally see him being a little soft (water retention) and he had the beginning stages of gyno. He clearly raised the dosage in around 1996 when he started competing at over 250 pounds.
Logged

England_1

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2132
Re: Was Ronnie that far from the mark in 1997?
« Reply #7 on: December 12, 2008, 10:24:57 PM »
Coleman, delusional as always. "I'm a lot sharper with more detail" lmfao....he was better in 96.
Logged
Team Yates
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »