Perhaps according to your personal preference, but such a position is contradicted by judging history, which is the method by which contests are determined. By the same rationale as you're employing, one could easily conclude Yates as being far superior from having handily defeated all comers, which includes Coleman, as well as those that defeated Coleman. Coleman had many close calls against lesser competition (also losing twice while champion), while Yates never broke a sweat in defeating higher caliber competitors; retiring with an 88% winning percentage. Indeed, the answer is clear, there are just those that seek to muddy the waters.
Yes. Exactly. Here I dont want to talk who was
greater.
I am only doing the competiton of the physic of Best version Dorian VS Best version Ronnie. thats it.
I know that Dorian was in his best condition constantly unlike ronnie.
But again, here lets talk about the physic of Best version Dorian VS Best version Ronnie.
And I am judging it based on Mass, cuts and shape. Thats it.
If I think about another point, I have tendency of putting my preference in it as you say.