j grey = AXA ? hahaha thats why j grey is such a dumb anti protein moron 
no offense AXA lol
I personally don't believe that's true. I do agree with you that J Grey is a moron. That being said...
Dear J Grey,King James Version
Gospel according to John, chapter 7
7:37 In the last day, that great day of the feast, Jesus stood and cried, saying, If any man thirst, let him come unto me, and drink.
7:38 He that believeth on me, as the scripture hath said, out of his belly shall flow rivers of living water.
In John verse 7:37 Jesus, after getting drunk offering people to drink his urine, thereafter, Jesus in John 7:38 explicitly teaching/preaching/telling people that those who believe in me can drink urine and their bellies shall flow rivers of living water. We all know that only living water, which flow from our bellies is urine. And how retarded one should be to miss that and believe in a convicted felon to be his/her god?
This is the undeniable evidence that Jesus served his urine and preached urine drinking. By the way, we all know that Jesus was a freeloader and never had a job, home and life; therefore, question of having goblets and/or cups cannot be entertained. This will explain the tradition of “below job”, which perhaps begin then (what a double pleasure in Christianity). No wonder, Paul sucked Timothy’s penis as we read:
What was the method used in those days to circumcise someone? This is explained in detail by A. N. Wilson who writes:
By Roman times, circumcision was done with a metal knife, and, if we believe that Paul did insist on Timothy undergoing circumcision, it is perhaps worth reminding ourselves of the three essential parts of the ritual, without which it is not complete. The first part is milah, the cutting away of the outer part of the foreskin. The is done with one sweep of the knife. The second part, periah, is the tearing of the inner lining of the foreskin which still adheres to the glans, so as to lay it wholly bare. This was (and is) done by the operator - the mohel, the professional circumciser - with his thumb-nail and index finger. The third and essential part of the ritual is mesisah, the sucking of blood from the wound. Since the nineteenth century, it has been permissible to finish this part of the ritual with a swab, but in all preceding centuries and certainly in the time of Paul it was necessary for the mohel to clean the wound by taking the penis into his mouth. In the case of a young adult male such as Timothy the bleeding would have been copious. 12 We can easily imagine why Paul's Gentile converts were unwilling to undergo the ritual; and, given the more liberal attitudes towards the Torah which had already begun to emerge among the Hellenists of Syrian Antioch, it is not surprising that the custom of circumcision should have started to wane. It took the extremism of Paul to think that the knife of circumcision would actually 'cut you . . . off from Christ'. But could any greater contrast be imagined between this belief and the traditional Jewish view that those who did not weild that knife delayed the coming of the Messiah?
