Author Topic: cheapest, efficient cycle with min. sides:  (Read 16188 times)

Cleanest Natural

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 28662
  • Diet first, all else second
Re: cheapest, efficient cycle with min. sides:
« Reply #75 on: December 31, 2008, 06:48:45 AM »
it's gonna be the same with every drug IMO
;)

jtsunami

  • Time Out
  • Getbig V
  • *
  • Posts: 7067
  • I support Bigbobs
Re: cheapest, efficient cycle with min. sides:
« Reply #76 on: December 31, 2008, 07:02:59 AM »
yeah proof, just ask the twink above  ;)

Test is better IMO - that's probably going to be my next cycle - 900mg test a week for 15 weeks. I wouldn't go back to Dbol - you lose eveything you've gained.

why exaclty 900mg, what is your test dosed at? 

jt
TEAM Nasser

JasonH

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 11704
Re: cheapest, efficient cycle with min. sides:
« Reply #77 on: January 01, 2009, 02:27:04 AM »
yeah proof, just ask the twink above  ;)

why exaclty 900mg, what is your test dosed at? 

jt

I'll be running test enanthate from pro.chem labs - I've used it before - their stuff comes in 300mg/ml in a 10ml vial. It's much easier to work out 600 or 900mg a week than 500 or 1000mg.

Cleanest Natural

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 28662
  • Diet first, all else second
Re: cheapest, efficient cycle with min. sides:
« Reply #78 on: January 01, 2009, 02:28:00 AM »
yeah proof, just ask the twink above  ;)

why exaclty 900mg, what is your test dosed at? 

jt
The gayest getbig fruitcake is giving gear advise ?  :D

theworm

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4019
  • Getbig!
Re: cheapest, efficient cycle with min. sides:
« Reply #79 on: January 01, 2009, 07:03:05 AM »
yeah, i think a 600 test x 15 weeks os going to be good for me... of course its HG!  so thats prob equivilent to 1200 of UG crap.
you are gay.

Luv2Hurt

  • Competitors II
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6036
Re: cheapest, efficient cycle with min. sides:
« Reply #80 on: January 01, 2009, 07:08:38 AM »
yeah, i think a 600 test x 15 weeks os going to be good for me... of course its HG!  so thats prob equivilent to 1200 of UG crap.

Well if it's bunk UG then yes.  Have had good luck with many UG companies as far as active ingredient.  But have found UG to cause more pain and swelling at injection sites.  More BA and less sterile conditions most likely, this is the best thing about HG and is what makes it better....its better quality and consistency.

krazee

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 682
  • It's all about the next shirt size....
Re: cheapest, efficient cycle with min. sides:
« Reply #81 on: January 02, 2009, 01:35:12 PM »
I did a test propionate only cycle for 6 week this summer

went from 190 to 243 in 4 weeks  ;D
major bloat but then, it was post contest

amazing strenght increase tho

Bro are you for real...53 lbs on just Prop...seems a little fishy there cuz..
Just spot me BITCH!!!

Stavios

  • Guest
Re: cheapest, efficient cycle with min. sides:
« Reply #82 on: January 02, 2009, 08:08:47 PM »
Bro are you for real...53 lbs on just Prop...seems a little fishy there cuz..
what's so hard about READING THE WHOLE FUCKING THREAD

it was after a contest, so there was a huge water rebound.

now, I am done on that subject and all the people who argue that it's not possible don't know jack shit about  bodybuilding.

there is nothing uncommon with a big water (and fat) gain after a contest  ::)

WillGrant

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 21058
  • Ron is Watching
Re: cheapest, efficient cycle with min. sides:
« Reply #83 on: January 02, 2009, 08:13:19 PM »
what's so hard about READING THE WHOLE FUCKING THREAD

it was after a contest, so there was a huge water rebound.

now, I am done on that subject and all the people who argue that it's not possible don't know jack shit about  bodybuilding.

there is nothing uncommon with a big water (and fat) gain after a contest  ::)
Meltdownnnnnnnnnn  ;D

MuscleMcMannus

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6236
Re: cheapest, efficient cycle with min. sides:
« Reply #84 on: January 05, 2009, 03:33:21 PM »
what's so hard about READING THE WHOLE FUCKING THREAD

it was after a contest, so there was a huge water rebound.

now, I am done on that subject and all the people who argue that it's not possible don't know jack shit about  bodybuilding.

there is nothing uncommon with a big water (and fat) gain after a contest  ::)

LOL water rebound of 40lbs? Haha!   ::) 

Emmortal

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5660
Re: cheapest, efficient cycle with min. sides:
« Reply #85 on: January 05, 2009, 04:09:48 PM »
LOL water rebound of 40lbs? Haha!   ::) 

I don't' see what's so difficult to comprehend here, this is NOT uncommon after a contest.  The body is extremely depleted for a contest to get into shape and it's quite common for this rebound to happen.  Most guys who've been competing for a while don't let it happen that drastically because it can wreck havoc on the body, health and skin wise.  If you consider the fact that most competitors are 40-50lbs higher in the offseason than they are in contest shape what do you think happens when you start mass feeding the body after a severe depletion like that?  Huge rebound.

Luv2Hurt

  • Competitors II
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6036
Re: cheapest, efficient cycle with min. sides:
« Reply #86 on: January 05, 2009, 04:24:56 PM »
Yeah look at the pros, I saw a guy who won a pro show the weekend before and he guest posed at a local show and I ws amazed at how out of shape he was.

MuscleMcMannus

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6236
Re: cheapest, efficient cycle with min. sides:
« Reply #87 on: January 06, 2009, 02:26:13 AM »
I don't' see what's so difficult to comprehend here, this is NOT uncommon after a contest.  The body is extremely depleted for a contest to get into shape and it's quite common for this rebound to happen.  Most guys who've been competing for a while don't let it happen that drastically because it can wreck havoc on the body, health and skin wise.  If you consider the fact that most competitors are 40-50lbs higher in the offseason than they are in contest shape what do you think happens when you start mass feeding the body after a severe depletion like that?  Huge rebound.

40lbs of water in 4 weeks????????  You're an idiot as well!  15-20lbs MAYBE!  No fucking way 40lbs of water.  Go back to science class genius. 

Luv2Hurt

  • Competitors II
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6036
Re: cheapest, efficient cycle with min. sides:
« Reply #88 on: January 06, 2009, 04:55:19 AM »
I do have to say it would take me a couple months to put on 40lbs after a show.

StillTippin

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 502
Re: cheapest, efficient cycle with min. sides:
« Reply #89 on: January 06, 2009, 08:54:07 AM »
I do have to say it would take me a couple months to put on 40lbs after a show.

But you're not the Stavios.   ;)

Stavios

  • Guest
Re: cheapest, efficient cycle with min. sides:
« Reply #90 on: January 09, 2009, 02:48:52 PM »
But you're not the Stavios.   ;)

 ::)

I said I gained Bloat, not anything else.  ::)

I now declare everyone who does not believe a 40-50 lbs gain in 1 month after a contest a complete idiot !

now to all the haters who never even dieted down, please fuck off

Your friend, Stavios  8)


StillTippin

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 502
Re: cheapest, efficient cycle with min. sides:
« Reply #91 on: January 09, 2009, 04:06:08 PM »
::)

I said I gained Bloat, not anything else.  ::)

I now declare everyone who does not believe a 40-50 lbs gain in 1 month after a contest a complete idiot !

now to all the haters who never even dieted down, please fuck off

Your friend, Stavios  8)



That wasn't a shot at you man.  I believe you, what would be the point in lying about it.

I'm dieting for my second show right now and without even trying I'm sure I will be up 20-25 pounds a month after.  Double that on your frame size isn't unreasonable when going a little crazy.

I'm gonna be avoiding that though since I don't want those lower back pumps.  I hate those almost as much as foot cramps!

Van_Bilderass

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 14917
  • "Don't Try"
Re: cheapest, efficient cycle with min. sides:
« Reply #92 on: January 09, 2009, 04:10:34 PM »
40lbs of water in 4 weeks????????  You're an idiot as well!  15-20lbs MAYBE!  No fucking way 40lbs of water.  Go back to science class genius. 

I have seen almost that in a couple of days. No shit. Think about this example: you have been on zero carbs for a several weeks. Day before show you shoot Lasix and take 15lbs off overnight. What do you think happens when you stuff your face after the show?

StillTippin

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 502
Re: cheapest, efficient cycle with min. sides:
« Reply #93 on: January 09, 2009, 04:16:36 PM »
I have seen almost that in a couple of days. No shit. Think about this example: you have been on zero carbs for a several weeks. Day before show you shoot Lasix and take 15lbs off overnight. What do you think happens when you stuff your face after the show?

Just out of curiosity, have you competed before Van?  I'm assuming you have with the gear knowledge and all.  Sorry if you've discussed it before, I've never seen you mention it.

Van_Bilderass

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 14917
  • "Don't Try"
Re: cheapest, efficient cycle with min. sides:
« Reply #94 on: January 09, 2009, 04:26:09 PM »
Just out of curiosity, have you competed before Van?  I'm assuming you have with the gear knowledge and all.  Sorry if you've discussed it before, I've never seen you mention it.

Only once a long time ago. Injuries put an end to that unfortunately. I have a lot of friends who compete which is why I've seen these rebounds.

StillTippin

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 502
Re: cheapest, efficient cycle with min. sides:
« Reply #95 on: January 09, 2009, 04:38:40 PM »
Only once a long time ago. Injuries put an end to that unfortunately. I have a lot of friends who compete which is why I've seen these rebounds.

Sorry to hear that.  Training injuries or something else?

jtsunami

  • Time Out
  • Getbig V
  • *
  • Posts: 7067
  • I support Bigbobs
Re: cheapest, efficient cycle with min. sides:
« Reply #96 on: January 09, 2009, 04:45:15 PM »
Sorry to hear that.  Training injuries or something else?

very sad indeed, although he is still a strong poster here.

jt
TEAM Nasser

Van_Bilderass

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 14917
  • "Don't Try"
Re: cheapest, efficient cycle with min. sides:
« Reply #97 on: January 09, 2009, 07:32:53 PM »
Sorry to hear that.  Training injuries or something else?

Yeah, mainly a pec that's torn as bad as it can be torn.

very sad indeed, although he is still a strong poster here.

jt

lmao  :D

Stavios

  • Guest
Re: cheapest, efficient cycle with min. sides:
« Reply #98 on: January 10, 2009, 10:23:16 AM »
I have seen almost that in a couple of days. No shit. Think about this example: you have been on zero carbs for a several weeks. Day before show you shoot Lasix and take 15lbs off overnight. What do you think happens when you stuff your face after the show?

Exactly !!!!

a dude from my gym gained 35 lbs in less than 48 hours.
he had to be hospitalized tho

StillTippin

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 502
Re: cheapest, efficient cycle with min. sides:
« Reply #99 on: January 10, 2009, 11:25:51 AM »
Exactly !!!!

a dude from my gym gained 35 lbs in less than 48 hours.
he had to be hospitalized tho

Fuck that sounds painfull.  Did they give him diuretics at the hospital or anything?