Author Topic: ESPN and the Giants  (Read 3542 times)

body88

  • Guest
Re: ESPN and the Giants
« Reply #25 on: December 15, 2008, 06:37:35 PM »
Quote
Ridiculous, no one else but you keeps reverting to comparisons with NE because you're such a homer it's embarassing.

No I cited NE because that is the team I like to watch, and they lost far more important players than the Giants.  I don't see people making excuses for them.  I also stated that other teams had for more injuries than the Giants....not just the pats.  You ignore this because this is how you argue.....whole bunch of hot air, and ignoring facts. You will NEVER go point by point.  You ignore what you can't argue, then insult people.

Quote
I'm not a strong giants fan actually.
Lie.....You say that about every team, yet you go crazy when anyone talks bad about the Giants, haha.

Quote
You've made the mistake of lumping the other two backs together when in fact Bradshaw might well be an adequate replacement for Jacobs. As i already pointed out, we don't know because he doesn't get much playing time.
You called him a better back in another thread, and the fact that you are making excuses for the Giants when they lost two players is laughable.  Pretty sure every team in the NFL would like some of their best players back.

body88

  • Guest
Re: ESPN and the Giants
« Reply #26 on: December 15, 2008, 06:40:29 PM »
If "body" were smarter:

-He would stop being such a homer-he has no objectivity whatsoever and always brings a conversation back to NE-LAME.

-He would realize that this sleepy board needs dispirate opinions, and CALM DOWN when they're expressed...DUH


A laughable and insane post, by pumpster.  Anyone who insults people in a discussion like you do cannot be very mature.  50 going on 13, hahahaha!!!!  I didn't insult you, yet you act like an asshole.....great job, your a web terd  ::)

tonymctones

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 26520
Re: ESPN and the Giants
« Reply #27 on: December 15, 2008, 06:45:52 PM »
As i mentioned, it's a combo of factors including Burris' long-term (not short-term) absense, the fact that they continued to use their least-effective RB, the adverse distraction of the Burris affair (plays on teams' psyche big-time, doesn't take much) and the usual seasonal dip that all teams go thru and even require for the rest of the grind of the season.

If they play well next game, even if they don't win, they're back on track. Carolina's not that strong on the road.
come on man they had a week long press escapade about the situation in dallas thats a cop out in my opinion. I think that NY is definitly a better team than Dallas is but like i said even with jacobs and burris the way they played with their O line and defense they still would have lost.

pumpster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 18890
  • If you're reading this you have too much free time
Re: ESPN and the Giants
« Reply #28 on: December 15, 2008, 06:49:18 PM »

A laughable and insane post, by pumpster.  Anyone who insults people in a discussion like you do cannot be very mature.  50 going on 13, hahahaha!!!!  I didn't insult you, yet you act like an asshole.....great job, your a web terd  ::)

Meltdown #4 just today from our calm, impartial moderator  ::) ::) ::) ::)

pumpster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 18890
  • If you're reading this you have too much free time
Re: ESPN and the Giants
« Reply #29 on: December 15, 2008, 06:51:32 PM »
come on man they had a week long press escapade about the situation in dallas thats a cop out in my opinion. I think that NY is definitly a better team than Dallas is but like i said even with jacobs and burris the way they played with their O line and defense they still would have lost.

Think about it. The lines didn't all of a sudden go from great to nothing, that's a mental problem on the oline related both to the team being flat, related to the Burris diversion, a normal mid-season dip, etc. and the fact that they've not been able to consistently run the ball. Only partially due to Jacobs' being out, they really haven't found out if they could do it with another good back like Bradshaw, haven't tried it. The other back they've stuck with is just average.

tonymctones

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 26520
Re: ESPN and the Giants
« Reply #30 on: December 15, 2008, 07:08:04 PM »
Think about it. The lines didn't all of a sudden go from great to nothing, that's a mental problem on the oline related both to the team being flat, related to the Burris diversion, a normal mid-season dip, etc. and the fact that they've not been able to consistently run the ball. Only partially due to Jacobs' being out, they really haven't found out if they could do it with another good back like Bradshaw, haven't tried it. The other back they've stuck with is just average.
LOL and what of whitten and owens and romo and barber dude they had alot of shit talked about them this past week and they seemed to play decent so this only effects the giants O line? again cop out The dallas defense did a great job last night and thats why the O line looked like shit and they couldnt get anything started NOT b/c of burris and his antics or jacobs being out.

pumpster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 18890
  • If you're reading this you have too much free time
Re: ESPN and the Giants
« Reply #31 on: December 15, 2008, 07:14:09 PM »
The dallas defense did a great job last night and thats why the O line looked like shit and they couldnt get anything started NOT b/c of burris and his antics or jacobs being out.


Nice try, but WRONG. Wrong because in life and in football my friend, it's usually not one reason..

The boys played played at a much higher level because they had to. The giant's didn't have their backs against the wall. Biiiiiig difference..

Add in all those other things i've already mentioned..


BINGO...it wasn't just the cowboys playing great, no way. TOO SIMPLE - that's what i now refer to as "body88 simple" logic.. ;)

tonymctones

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 26520
Re: ESPN and the Giants
« Reply #32 on: December 15, 2008, 07:38:03 PM »

Nice try, but WRONG. Wrong because in life and in football my friend, it's usually not one reason..

The boys played played at a much higher level because they had to. The giant's didn't have their backs against the wall. Biiiiiig difference..

Add in all those other things i've already mentioned..


BINGO...it wasn't just the cowboys playing great, no way. TOO SIMPLE - that's what i now refer to as "body88 simple" logic.. ;)
Im not saying there where not other circumstances that didnt have anything to do with them winning but THE MAIN REASON THEY WON is b/c they outplayed the giants PLAIN AND SIMPLE and again regardless of whether they had jacobs and burris and w/o all his shit dallas still would have won b/c the OUTPLAYED them. You keep adding more and more shit hey how about the tempreture being 74 instead of 63 and hey how about the humidity in dallas...lol  ::) dude plain and simple giants got outplayed

body88

  • Guest
Re: ESPN and the Giants
« Reply #33 on: December 15, 2008, 10:17:01 PM »

Nice try, but WRONG. Wrong because in life and in football my friend, it's usually not one reason..

The boys played played at a much higher level because they had to. The giant's didn't have their backs against the wall. Biiiiiig difference..

Add in all those other things i've already mentioned..


BINGO...it wasn't just the cowboys playing great, no way. TOO SIMPLE - that's what i now refer to as "body88 simple" logic.. ;)

Only a person who thinks they are very smart makes things more complicated than they really are.  A good example of this is most of your posts.  That simple logic you speak of is reality , and your excuses for a team missing two players is legendary.  You won't recover.

The Cowboys played better than the Giants, and you are making excuses for injuries when everyone has them as bad or far worse than the Giants.  Face it pump, you are already making excuses.

pumpster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 18890
  • If you're reading this you have too much free time
Re: ESPN and the Giants
« Reply #34 on: December 15, 2008, 11:16:04 PM »
THE MAIN REASON THEY WON is b/c they outplayed the giants PLAIN AND SIMPLE and again regardless of whether they had jacobs and burris and w/o all his shit dallas still would have won b/c the OUTPLAYED them. You keep adding more and more shit hey how about the tempreture being 74 instead of 63 and hey how about the humidity in dallas...lol  ::) dude plain and simple giants got outplayed

Dallas was as desperate as it gets, Giants weren't. Big difference. Future doesn't necessarily follow Sunday night, it mainly depends what the Giants do the next game or two, not what Dallas does. ;)


pumpster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 18890
  • If you're reading this you have too much free time
Re: ESPN and the Giants
« Reply #35 on: December 15, 2008, 11:18:55 PM »
Only a person who thinks they are very smart makes things more complicated than they really are.  A good example of this is most of your posts.  That simple logic you speak of is reality , and your excuses for a team missing two players is legendary.  You won't recover.

The Cowboys played better than the Giants, and you are making excuses for injuries when everyone has them as bad or far worse than the Giants.  Face it pump, you are already making excuses.

The posts are long-winded and one-dimensional, in other words BORING. Your views aren't objective, so who cares?

You're completely, utterly biased-the worst kinda homer AND are a beligerent hothead. Not an impressive moderator!!


Hope this helps. ;)

body88

  • Guest
Re: ESPN and the Giants
« Reply #36 on: December 16, 2008, 06:16:09 AM »
The posts are long-winded and one-dimensional, in other words BORING. Your views aren't objective, so who cares?

You're completely, utterly biased-the worst kinda homer AND are a beligerent hothead. Not an impressive moderator!!


Hope this helps. ;)

Whatever you say pumpster, I may be a lot of things, but your reputation on the board is quite clear.  I don't even have to say anything  :)

pumpster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 18890
  • If you're reading this you have too much free time
Re: ESPN and the Giants
« Reply #37 on: December 20, 2008, 08:51:59 PM »
LAST GAME at Texas Stadium tonight an EMBARASSING loss for the OVERHYPED BOYS..
hahahaahahahahaahahahahahahahahahahaahahahaahahahahahahaahahahahahaahahahahahahahaahahahahahahahaahahahahahahahahahaahahahahahahaahahahahahaha
hahahaahahahahaahahahaha hahahahahahaahahahaahaha hahahahaahahahahahaahaha hahahahahaahahahahahahah aahahahahahahahahahaahah ahahahahaahahahahahaha
hahahaahahahahaahahahaha hahahahahahaahahahaahaha hahahahaahahahahahaahaha hahahahahaahahahahahahah aahahahahahahahahahaahah ahahahahaahahahahahaha
hahahaahahahahaahahahaha hahahahahahaahahahaahaha hahahahaahahahahahaahaha hahahahahaahahahahahahah aahahahahahahahahahaahah ahahahahaahahahahahaha
hahahaahahahahaahahahaha hahahahahahaahahahaahaha hahahahaahahahahahaahaha hahahahahaahahahahahahah aahahahahahahahahahaahah ahahahahaahahahahahaha
hahahaahahahahaahahahaha hahahahahahaahahahaahaha hahahahaahahahahahaahaha hahahahahaahahahahahahah aahahahahahahahahahaahah ahahahahaahahahahahaha

Option D

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 17367
  • Kelly the Con Way
Re: ESPN and the Giants
« Reply #38 on: December 20, 2008, 09:08:14 PM »
hahahahahahahahaahahahha hahahahahahahahahahahaha


the best team not to make the playoffs ever..These fags didnt make the fuckin playoffs...they suck

pumpster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 18890
  • If you're reading this you have too much free time
Re: ESPN and the Giants
« Reply #39 on: December 20, 2008, 09:44:49 PM »
hahahahahahahahaahahahhahahahahahahahahahahahaha


the best team not to make the playoffs ever..These fags didnt make the fuckin playoffs...they suck

GETBIG EXPERTS: "COWBOYS HAVE SOME OF THE BEST TALENT" BWHAHAHAHAAHAHAHA


IRVING — It took 37-plus seasons for Texas Stadium to wear down and finally wear out. The current edition of the Cowboys managed to do it in one night.

Saturday’s last call for football in the Irving river bottoms also signaled, almost definitely, the end of something else. Meaning this season, and all the early over-blown hype associated with it.

Speaking of bye-bye, also please include the brief local coaching career of Wade Phillips, unless he can somehow blame the evening’s sudden defensive collapse on his thrown-under-the-bus friend, Brian Stewart.

Mr. Fix It obviously bragged too soon on his defensive expertise, and is now in a firing fix after a frantic Cowboys rally by Tony Romo was scuttled on — this is impossible — back to back touchdown runs of 77 and 82 yards late in the fourth quarter.

Then again, Jerry Jones is the dumbest general manager in the history of football, and there he was, postgame on Saturday, proclaiming he has no plans, no matter what, to fire Wade. See, it’s real hard to find good puppets these days.

pumpster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 18890
  • If you're reading this you have too much free time
Re: ESPN and the Giants
« Reply #40 on: December 21, 2008, 07:12:52 AM »
It's too bad the Cowboys couldn't figure things out in the final game at Texas Stadium -- especially since Jones apparently petitioned the league for the Cowboys to play the Ravens because it once looked like a winnable game. Jones sort of confirmed that theory to me after the game, but I couldn't tell whether he was joking. It didn't matter to the Ravens.
If that is true, that is sad on so many levels. I mean, would the NFL actually schedule a perceived weak opponent for a team's final game at their stadium just so they can go out on a positive note? And why would the proud owner of America's Team need to line up a cupcake? Shouldn't a team that was the favorite to represent the NFC in the Super Bowl be able to take on all comers?

It makes it all the more laughable that the Ravens came in and beat them. In their first and last appearance at Texas Stadium, Baltimore will leave as only the second undefeated team (the Raiders won all three of their games there).

The Cowboys had no shortage of bad teams that stopped in on Texas Stadium's final season. Cincinnati, San Francisco and Seattle are among the worst teams in the league. But all of them looked somewhat formidable before the season began. The Ravens were coming off a 5-11 season, had a rookie head coach running things and no idea who their quarterback would be. They had the best look of a cupcake team back in April.

Instead, the Ravens look like a playoff team. Dallas, on the other hand, doesn't.

No word if the Cowboys are planning on asking the league to schedule the Detroit Lions to help open up the new Cowboys Stadium in 2009.