EXACTLY! Did you catch Necrosis' sorry ass reply's and epic inability to learn and comprehend?
![Grin ;D](http://www.getbig.com/boards/Smileys/classic/grin.gif)
so Urea has no positive benefits, what else is in urine in significant concentrations that you claim cures disease?
1: Br J Cancer. 1988 Mar;57(3):317-8.Links
Oral urea in the treatment of secondary tumours in the liver.Clark PI, Slevin ML, Webb JA, Osborne RJ, Jones S, Wrigley PF.
Department of Medical Oncology, St. Bartholomew's Hospital, London, UK.
Twenty patients with secondary liver tumours, predominantly from colorectal carcinoma, were treated with oral urea at a daily dose of 8 gm-2. Treatment was well tolerated without side-effects. No objective responses were seen. It is concluded that oral urea is ineffective in the treatment of liver metastases from colorectal cancer.
1: Clin Oncol. 1984 Dec;10(4):341-4.Links
Oral urea in the treatment of colo-rectal liver metastases.Hooper TL, Rahman M, Magell J.
A consecutive series of 10 patients with hepatic metastases from colo-rectal carcinoma have been treated with oral urea. This substance has been reported to produce regression of hepatic secondaries from a variety of primary sources including colon. Although well tolerated, and leading to subjective improvement in some patients, no objective benefit has been confirmed from the treatment in this study.