Its the idea that the constitution should be interpeted in a way that reflects the current normals of the day, etc, as opposed to the original intent of the founders of the country in constructing the consitution in the first place.
Its complete garbage because the constitution is supposed to be a bulwark against an over reaching and abusive government.
If the constitution provides for amendments, doesn't that mean some sort of mind must be paid to changing the document? Change it for what? Times change.
In law school, we had the Doctrine of Changed Circumtsances, remember? I thought that was pretty stupid at the time, but I was wrong.
Do times change? Yup. Why not have amendments that meet those demands? We do.
What about the checks and balances of gov. power? Those are still pristine....until Bush and the Congress ignored them for the last 8 years...yes, I mean democrats too.