Author Topic: Divorce: George David (66) & Marie (36)  (Read 11630 times)

BayGBM

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 19684
Divorce: George David (66) & Marie (36)
« on: December 19, 2008, 08:23:49 AM »
REALLY HIGH MAINTENANCE
By ANDY GELLER

The estranged wife of United Technologies Chairman George David says she has weekly expenses of $53,000 - more than what half the households in America earn annually and higher than the cost of attending an Ivy League school for a year.

Pity poor Marie Douglas-David, 36, a stunning Swedish countess in the middle of a divorce. She has no job, no assets and must depend on the largesse of her 66-year-old hubby for her well-being.

He is being kind.

At a hearing this week in Hartford Superior Court, he agreed to pay her $978,000 until their legal teams work out the terms of their divorce, including whether a $43 million post-nup she signed is still valid.

After six years of marriage, the eye-candy countess wants to keep the couple's 10,000-square-foot penthouse at 740 Park Ave., a source said.

She's willing to let David keep the weekend retreat in Sagaponack. It's a rental ($425,000 a year) anyway.

So how does Douglas-David, a former investment banker for Lazard Asset Management, manage to spend $53,000 a week?

Mortgage and maintenance fees and rent for the Park Avenue penthouse, the Hamptons retreat and properties in Sweden account for $27,300 a week, according to a financial affidavit she filed with the court. And then there's travel ($8,000), clothing ($4,500), a personal assistant ($2,209), horse care ($1,570), domestic help ($1,480), entertainment and restaurants ($1,500), health and skin care ($1,000), dry cleaning ($650), flowers ($600) and a trainer ($250).

And it must be noted after Douglas-David is cutting back.

A footnote to her affidavit said, "While recognizing that many of these expenses may seem high, most are lower than prior to the commencement of this case in August 2007."

A source said the footnote referred to the fact that while the countess and her husband, who used to be the CEO of United Technologies, were together, they spent $200,000 a week - or $10 million a year.

Douglas-David, the source said, only wants to live in the style to which she has grown accustomed. She has had no job since - with the backing of her husband - she quit her post at Lazard in 2003.

"It's all about her standard of living," the source said.

What about everybody else's standard of living?

According to the 2006 Census, 51.3 percent of American households earn less than $50,000.

And the cost of attending a year at Harvard, Princeton or Brown is about $50,000.

According to Douglas-David's affidavit, she has assets of $4.4 million, but debts of $5.7 million, including $2.9 million she owes her husband for loans he made.

In court testimony, David said he made several purchases of jewelry for his wife, including a $138,582 diamond engagement ring, $100,000 diamond earrings, and a pair of $255,000 diamond-earring studs. But he continued to own the bling - apparently to avoid gift taxes. That's why the countess lists the value of her jewelry as only $5,000.

The couple hobnobbed with the likes of Russian Prime Minister Vladimir Putin and took trips to China, Germany, Paris, London, the Bahamas and St. Tropez on United Technologies corporate jets and on a chartered yacht, The Hartford Courant reported.

~weed~

  • Guest
Re: Divorce: George David (66) & Marie (36)
« Reply #1 on: December 22, 2008, 10:58:38 AM »
Someone has a fixation with divorces.   ::)

powerpack

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3166
  • Time to get Buck wild!
Re: Divorce: George David (66) & Marie (36)
« Reply #2 on: December 23, 2008, 10:37:03 AM »
Someone has a fixation with divorces.   ::)
I also noticed

BayGBM

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 19684
Re: Divorce: George David (66) & Marie (36)
« Reply #3 on: March 19, 2009, 08:34:21 PM »
Ex-banker wife contests $43 million post-nup
Dave Collins, Associated Press

A 36-year-old Swedish countess divorcing a former CEO says she cannot live on $43 million.

Marie Douglas-David, a former investment banker, says she has no income and needs her 67-year-old husband, George David, to pay her more than $53,000 a week - more than most U.S. households make in a year - to cover her expenses.

David stepped down last year as chief executive at Hartford-based United Technologies Corp. but is still chairman of the board and has an estimated net worth of $329 million. He and his wife accuse each other of extramarital affairs. Their divorce trial started Wednesday.

"I'm just very sad that we are where we are," Douglas-David said. "I hope we resolve this soon so everybody can move on with their lives."

David briefly took the stand Wednesday. Asked if his marriage is irretrievably broken, he simply answered, "Yes."

David and Douglas-David married in 2002, but the marriage was in trouble by 2004, court papers show. Amid a series of reconciliations, the couple signed a postnuptial agreement in October 2005 that would give her $43 million when they divorce.

Douglas-David wants the agreement invalidated. She accused her husband of coercing her to sign it by preying upon her fears of being divorced and childless. She's asking to be awarded about $100 million in cash and stock, plus $130,000 a month in alimony.

David is asking a judge to uphold the agreement and order Douglas-David to vacate their Park Avenue apartment but keep their properties in Sweden. His attorneys asked for a separate hearing Wednesday on the document's validity, but the judge declined.

Douglas-David has filed court papers showing she has more than $53,800 in weekly expenses, including for maintaining a Park Avenue apartment and three residences in Sweden. Her weekly expenses also include $700 for limousine service, $4,500 for clothes, $1,000 for hair and skin treatments, $1,500 for restaurants and entertainment, and $8,000 for travel.

At that rate, Douglas-David would burn through $43 million in less than 16 years. The Census Bureau estimates that the median U.S. household income in 2007 was just over $50,000.

Migs

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 14487
  • THERE WAS A FIRE FIGHT!!!!
Re: Divorce: George David (66) & Marie (36)
« Reply #4 on: March 19, 2009, 08:46:35 PM »
crazy figures. 

Cap

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6363
  • Trueprotein.com 5% discount code= CSP111
Re: Divorce: George David (66) & Marie (36)
« Reply #5 on: March 20, 2009, 06:22:52 AM »
What's sad is that a judge somewhere is going to give her all the money she wants.  She has no need for any of those expenses, aside from a roof over her head.  Assistant? No.  Flowers? No.  Travel? No.  She can live on 43 mil until she finds another sucker husband.  Just because you used to live on $53k a week doesn't mean you still should.
Squishy face retard

BayGBM

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 19684
Re: Divorce: George David (66) & Marie (36)
« Reply #6 on: March 20, 2009, 06:53:36 AM »
True, any reasonable (or even an unreasonable) person could live on $43 million, but I don’t feel sorry for her husband in the slightest.  Why did a 64 year old man marry a 34 year old woman?  Did he really think she wanted him for his body?

He wanted a trophy and that is what he got.  Well you know what?  Trophies cost money.  And now he has to pay.  If (like most CEOs) you are paid over the top, and you live and over the top lifestyle, you have over the top expenses—including an over the top divorce settlement.  The man is more than old enough to be her father but he balked at pairing up with a woman his own age.

Let’s see, he was 64 when they wed, but apparently a 64 year old woman was too old for him; a 54 year old woman was too old for him; a 44 year old woman was too old for him.  So, he went for the 34 year old.  Does this sound like a well adjusted person to you or someone who is hopelessly selfish?  These maladjusted people are everywhere and no one ever calls them on their bullshit.  Polite society just smiles and acts like everything is as it should be (usually because the old guy has a lot of money).  It is horribly sexist and disrespectful to ALL women when mature women are tossed aside in favor of trophies.

Alas these “men” exist in the gay world too.  Remember this post?

I have never really liked pictures of the bodies of older men even though I am over 60 myself now. Mind you I have never worked out in my life as my involvement in bodybuilding has been restricted to photography.  I much prefer the aesthetics of a younger man.
So to ask me which is better, Youngblood or Cicherillo, is just like asking me if I prefer dogshite or pigshite on my shoe. I prefer neither dear boys.  ;)


Cap

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6363
  • Trueprotein.com 5% discount code= CSP111
Re: Divorce: George David (66) & Marie (36)
« Reply #7 on: March 20, 2009, 12:45:52 PM »
True, any reasonable (or even an unreasonable) person could live on $43 million, but I don’t feel sorry for her husband in the slightest.  Why did a 64 year old man marry a 34 year old woman?  Did he really think she wanted him for his body?

He wanted a trophy and that is what he got.  Well you know what?  Trophies cost money.  And now he has to pay.  If (like most CEOs) you are paid over the top, and you live and over the top lifestyle, you have over the top expenses—including an over the top divorce settlement.  The man is more than old enough to be her father but he balked at pairing up with a woman his own age.

Let’s see, he was 64 when they wed, but apparently a 64 year old woman was too old for him; a 54 year old woman was too old for him; a 44 year old woman was too old for him.  So, he went for the 34 year old.  Does this sound like a well adjusted person to you or someone who is hopelessly selfish?  These maladjusted people are everywhere and no one ever calls them on their bullshit.  Polite society just smiles and acts like everything is as it should be (usually because the old guy has a lot of money).  It is horribly sexist and disrespectful to ALL women when mature women are tossed aside in favor of trophies.

Alas these “men” exist in the gay world too.  Remember this post?

I don't think dating a younger woman makes you sexist.  Maybe he wanted a lively hot woman to make him feel younger...you know, kind of how older women date younger men for the same reason.  I would say if she is just as selfish as he is and I would feel sorry for him if he had to pay a cent over $43 mil because 1.) they have a contract stating that's what she would get, 2.) nobody is even worth that much.
Squishy face retard

BayGBM

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 19684
Re: Divorce: George David (66) & Marie (36)
« Reply #8 on: March 20, 2009, 06:37:18 PM »
People in hell want ice water but that doesn’t mean they deserve it.

By itself, dating a younger woman doesn’t make the man sexist, but in context it is very unflattering.  Very often when we see these pairings it is a much older man with money (who has not taken very good care of himself) pairing up with a very attractive young woman who has meager resources (compared to him).  She has much less experience in virtually everything and the relationship is necessarily grounded in inequality.  Historically these relationships have been very unhealthy places for women to be.

It’s not as if women die at 40 and there are no eligible mature women for him to consider.  Mr. David had plenty of opportunities to have “a lively hot woman to make him feel young”—when he was young.

I posted this article in this forum because I’d really like to hear some women comment on this.  How do you ladies feel about these kinds of relationships—especially when they come to an end?


BayGBM

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 19684
Re: Divorce: George David (66) & Marie (36)
« Reply #9 on: March 21, 2009, 08:43:45 AM »
They Made Swede Love
by LAURA ITALIANO

HARTFORD, Conn. An "off the reservation" countess who complains she can't live on a measly $36 million divorce settlement admitted she had a steamy affair with a strapping Swedish swordsman during her tumultuous marriage.

Her jilted husband was so angered when he caught wind of the infidelity, he spent nearly a quarter-million dollars on private eyes who stalked them through Stockholm, it was revealed during Day 3 of the sensational countess-vs.-mogul smackdown in a Hartford divorce court.

Marie Douglas-David admitted in court papers that she had a sexual relationship with Alexander Oxenstierna, a suave fencer and head of a Swedish fencing association, according to sources familiar with the documents.

She was not questioned about the affair in open court.

Outside court, her estranged husband, George David, the chairman and former CEO of United Technologies, copped to siccing spies on his wife but declined to say how much he spent or to name his rival.

"I had reasons to expect she was off the reservation pretty early in the marriage. And the investigators found I was right," he said.

Douglas-David's lawyers said in court yesterday that five PIs followed the couple for two weeks in Stockholm in early 2004 and they had found a bill for $245,000 in fees.

The revelations became the main attraction in the down-and-dirty battle over whether the 36-year-old countess deserves $100 million to divorce the man she married in 2002.

David, 66 who has also been accused of cheating wants his estranged wife to stick to the terms of a postnup that would have given her $70 million if the stock market hadn't crashed. She's now due a measly $36 million.

But a girl's gotta eat and when that girl spends $53,000 a week on clothing, shoes, maids, manicures and cabs, $36 million won't take her far.

It'll all be gone in 15 years, she whines.

Showing off the $4,500 a week she spends on clothes, Douglas-David sported the 4-carat, $255,000 Harry Winston earrings her husband bestowed on her, a gray linen pencil skirt, black stilettos and a clingy cream cardigan.

Her husband is worth $320 million and spends $100,000 a week on his racing yacht.

David testified that he filed for divorce against the countess four times in three years most recently in August 2007 but in the first three cases he backed off after they reconciled.

David served his wife with divorce papers for the first time in August 2004 at their Sagaponack, LI, beach retreat, soon after learning that she was having an affair.

The icy cad whose company makes air-conditioners admitted he personally opened the door for the bailiff and ushered him into the home. Marie begged him not to leave her.

"Did Mrs. David appear to be upset?" asked celebrity defense lawyer William Beslow.

"I don't know how you would characterize it if she was upset," David replied.

Beslow went on to point out that in a deposition, the mogul admitted that "Marie was very upset and she commenced to hug me."

"Did your arms reciprocate the embrace?" the lawyer asked.

Boy, did they ever!

"The two of you had sexual relations that afternoon isn't that right?" Beslow pressed.

"That is correct," the cad said crisply.

When Beslow asked whether it was "surprising" that they'd had sex "in the home in which you'd just served her divorce papers," David answered, "No it wasn't surprising under the circumstances."

Did she appear to be upset? the mogul was asked.

"You're asking me to recall an observation and I can't recall it or I didn't make it. It doesn't stand out to be as being a big, dramatic event," he replied.

After they kissed so to speak and made up, David withdrew the divorce papers.

But he filed them again two months later on the very day that Douglas-David had an endoscopy, in which doctors probe the esophagus and stomach with a tube to check for abnormalities.

The cad didn't think that was a big deal, either.

"I've had a half-dozen endoscopies and a couple of colonoscopies. It's not a big deal," he said.

Beslow asked if David was able to put himself in his wife's frame of mind and realize she was upset.

"I don't think I'm able to do that with her or with anybody," he replied.

From her seat in the courtroom, the countess nodded her head in apparent agreement.

Outside court, David insisted he's not a cold fish. "I'm not a cold guy. I'm as empathetic and warm as can be," he told The Post. "I try to be correct, proper and accurate. You've got to be when you do the kind of work I do."

When it was pointed out that the divorce wasn't about work, David agreed.

"True, it wasn't work. But you have to view this in terms of what preceded it," he said. "The events just didn't seem that big to me. She had an affair with someone and had just admitted it to me."

His lawyer, Anne Dranginis, said, "It's his personality. He's a very literal, very precise man."

In March 2005, Davis again slapped divorce papers on his wife after getting out of their Park Avenue bed, making her a cup of tea and telling her he loved her.

Douglas-David took the witness stand only briefly she'll be back again next week to argue that he cruelly coerced her to accepting the postnup.

But in her half-hour on the stand yesterday, she described the circumstances around her own decision to sue her husband for divorce in 2006. "I wanted to get it over with very quickly," she said. "I wanted to have children."

"He had become very depressed and angry," she added. "I had tried to call him. I had tried to e-mail him. I left messages at his office and he refused to speak to me," she said.

The countess said that while she filed the divorce papers, she never served them on her husband. She didn't explain why not.

Cap

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6363
  • Trueprotein.com 5% discount code= CSP111
Re: Divorce: George David (66) & Marie (36)
« Reply #10 on: March 21, 2009, 08:56:08 AM »
I think infidelity should cause the person to get ZERO in divorce.
Squishy face retard

powerpack

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3166
  • Time to get Buck wild!
Re: Divorce: George David (66) & Marie (36)
« Reply #11 on: March 21, 2009, 09:19:35 AM »
Bay if a younger guy marries an older woman and takes her in the divorce court does that make it her fault as well then???

Not everything is a mans fault, men and woman who marry for money are con men and woman who know how to play people.

You sound like a man hating feminist  >:(

powerpack

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3166
  • Time to get Buck wild!
Re: Divorce: George David (66) & Marie (36)
« Reply #12 on: March 21, 2009, 09:23:22 AM »
I think infidelity should cause the person to get ZERO in divorce.
Yes and no.
I can see if a law is brought in like that people would with hold sex to get their partners to go out looking or even try and get some one to sleep with their partner.
People are evil
Watch the movie "What happens in Vegas stays in Vegas" with Aston Kutcher and whats her name.

BayGBM

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 19684
Re: Divorce: George David (66) & Marie (36)
« Reply #13 on: March 21, 2009, 04:00:05 PM »
No....  you'd have to meet the guy to understand the "earned it" comment.    I said "some people" might say she "earned it."  I think both men and women who know the man may say that.

What the woman did is wrong.  She is a snake imo.


Ssssssssssssssssssss!

Yes.  She is a wench for cheating AND also trying to void the agreement.  Shame on her! >:(

Cap

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6363
  • Trueprotein.com 5% discount code= CSP111
Re: Divorce: George David (66) & Marie (36)
« Reply #14 on: March 21, 2009, 04:14:28 PM »
Yes and no.
I can see if a law is brought in like that people would with hold sex to get their partners to go out looking or even try and get some one to sleep with their partner.
People are evil
Watch the movie "What happens in Vegas stays in Vegas" with Aston Kutcher and whats her name.
If you are a loving couple (especially with a prenup) and then cheating is involved, you should not get money.  If you cheat, you are saying the marriage is over, crap, etc so why should the man or woman get money?
Squishy face retard

BayGBM

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 19684
Re: Divorce: George David (66) & Marie (36)
« Reply #15 on: March 22, 2009, 07:31:23 AM »
Laura?  Jaguar?  Jade?  Ripitup?  Dina?  What happened to all the women who used to post here? ???

BayGBM

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 19684
Re: Divorce: George David (66) & Marie (36)
« Reply #16 on: March 23, 2009, 06:08:25 PM »
MOGUL HUBBY ACCUSED OF BEING JEALOUS OF COUNTESS WIFE
By LAURA ITALIANO
March 23, 2009 --

HARTFORD, Conn. - Lawyers for a Swedish countess who married United Technologies Chairman George David portrayed him this morning as a jealous spouse who destroyed her budding career as a financial analyst.

In day four of the divorce trial pitting David, 66, against his estranged wife, 36-year-old Marie Douglas-David, her lawyer William Beslow painted him as a man who couldn't stand to see his wife entertain male clients while she worked for the investment bank Lazard Freres.

David defended himself from those accusations, saying his ex-wife was kicked to the curb in 2003 because her bosses thought "she didn't have the hunger for Wall Street anymore" since she had married a rich man.

When Beslow grilled David further in Hartford Family Court, asking him if he had ever told his wife that a married woman shouldn't be seen in public after 5 p.m. without her husband, he replied, "No."

Asked if he was jealous when he heard his wife had had drinks with high-powered men at a Manhattan restaurant, he again said, "No."

Douglas-David is seeking $100 million from her ex-hubby, arguing that their 2005 post-nuptial agreement that promised her $43 million should be void.

She is also seeking a whopping $130,000 a month in alimony payments.

Douglas-David, who was dressed in a black skirt and beige sweater, scribbled on a yellow legal pad as her ex-husband testified before a packed courtroom.

Douglas-David is also fighting to keep her $190,000 engagement ring.

Beslow repeatedly tried to discredit David's claims that his client's engagement ring, real estate and other items were in his name - instead of hers - for tax purposes rather than as a calculated maneuver to keep her penniless.

David, who appeared calm as he fielded questions from the stand, noted that Douglas-David had full access to credit cards and bank accounts in his name, and that he never questioned her spending.

"I never once complained about her spending," he said. "Never once did I complain about her charges. She wrote the checks, she made the charges and I paid them."

He repeated that his plans, in the event they divorced, were that she would own items previously put in his name to avoid gift taxes.

He noted he made provisions in a post-nuptial settlement to allay her fears.

The couple married in 2002. David filed three previous divorce actions against his wife in 2004 and 2005 but didn't follow through with them.


BayGBM

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 19684
Re: Divorce: George David (66) & Marie (36)
« Reply #17 on: March 25, 2009, 09:36:59 AM »
Tycoon: Sex too rough for me

She forced Swede love on him!

The lurid countess-vs.-mogul smackdown unspooling in a Connecticut divorce court reached new lows yesterday, with the multimillionaire hubby insisting his much younger aristocrat wife was a Swedish fireball who would drag him to bed against his will.

"I recall one instance when she was very forceful, and I declined, and she exploded," insisted George David, chairman of the board and until recently CEO at United Technologies.

David, 66, made the startling accusation against his beautiful blond countess wife, Marie Douglas-David, 36, on day four of their divorce trial, as her lawyer grilled him on whether he kept bedding his wife even while keeping a mistress in the months after he filed for divorce in the summer of 2007.

How about that November '07 trip to Malta, asked the wife's lawyer, William Beslow.

David admitted that he slept in the same bed with his wife that night they'd come to the island so he could accept an award for a record-setting finish in his 90-foot racing yacht. But there was no sex.

"She initiated I declined," the mogul explained, sounding a bit like a CEO discussing contract negotiations.

"Did you have sex with Mrs. David on that one occasion [a month later in Sweden] when she forced herself on you?" the lawyer pressed, his voice tinged with incredulity. "That was against your will, wasn't it?"

"Yes it was," David answered.

"And that wasn't the first time Mrs. David forced herself on you, is that correct?" the lawyer asked.

"No it was not," the mogul asserted.

"There was that time she grabbed you by the arm and pulled you to the bed?" came the next question.

"Yes, frequently," he answered.

After court, the wife sniffed at her husband's account. "I'm just very sad that he's being that dishonest. I trusted my husband," she told The Post.

"I'm very disappointed at the very low level of his accusations."

Another of her lawyers, Robert Cohen, noted his client weighs 120 pounds soaking wet. "The notion that she could be raping a 226-pound man who's 6-foot-3 is beyond the pale," Cohen said.

Who slept with whom when is at issue in this tawdry, dripping-with-money trial, in which both sides accuse the other of affairs, greed and cruelty.

The countess' side is hoping to prove that the couple shared love and togetherness in the months after the divorce was filed. If the judge believes they reconciled albeit briefly he may toss out a 2005 postnuptial agreement granting her a measly 600,000 shares of United Technologies stock, currently worth around $36 million, or so they hope.

The husband's side contends that the postnup is rock solid and that she's being greedy in grabbing for any more of his hard-earned, $329 million fortune.

"She always wants more, more, more," complained his lawyer, Anne Dranginis. "Too much is never enough."

Testimony continues today.


BayGBM

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 19684
Re: Divorce: George David (66) & Marie (36)
« Reply #18 on: May 13, 2009, 09:05:02 PM »
Countess Has Hot New Swede

BEAUTIFUL blond Countess Marie Douglas-David is taking a break from her rancorous Connecticut divorce from her wealthy, elderly husband with a hard-bodied financier in her native Sweden.

Douglas-David -- who was allegedly taunted by her United Technologies chairman hubby George David about her "failure" to produce a child -- happily spent time with Johan Saxon and his two young kids at a circus in Stockholm on Sunday, The Post's Dan Mangan reports.

"They were smiling, joking with the children and joking with each other," said a witness. "They seemed very affectionate to each other."

The night before, Douglas-David, 36 -- who's seeking up to a $100 million payout from David, 67 -- hung out with some girlfriends at Teatergrillen, a fancy Stockholm restaurant where they washed down their dinner with champagne and wine.

The aristocratic stunner's handsome new and more age-appropriate man, Saxon, 43, is the founder of Saxon & Partners and Saxon Capital AB in Sweden.

"I'm happy to confirm they have been recently dating," said a spokesman for Douglas-David.

A former broker and financial analyst, Saxon was divorced from his own wife in 2007. His Facebook profile picture shows him shirtless, wearing a bathing suit and sunglasses.

A lawyer for George David, Anne Dranginis, said she knew about Saxon, "but we don't have any information that Mr. Saxon was involved with her during the course of [the Davids'] marriage."

Douglas-David, herself a former financial analyst, admittedly had an affair with Swedish swordsman Alexander Oxenstierna in Stockholm in 2004 while still ostensibly with her husband. David, for his part, has a girlfriend, Wendy Touton.

24KT

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 24454
  • Gold Savings Account Rep +1 (310) 409-2244
Re: Divorce: George David (66) & Marie (36)
« Reply #19 on: May 17, 2009, 12:10:10 AM »
Laura?  Jaguar?  Jade?  Ripitup?  Dina?  What happened to all the women who used to post here? ???

I honestly don't care to peruse through the mess of other people's divorces. It's their own private matter.
I wasn't a part of their marriage, ...I don't see why I should linger over the details of their divorce.
I wish them well, and hope they'll be able to get on with their lives after putting this difficult situation behind them.
w

ToxicAvenger

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 26516
  • I thawt I taw a twat!
Re: Divorce: George David (66) & Marie (36)
« Reply #20 on: May 17, 2009, 10:14:35 AM »
it me it boils down to premeditated greed...

nothing much more than a common thief....plain ole trash...

at least these women did not breed ...which is good..
carpe` vaginum!