Author Topic: Proof that 247 pounds doesn't stack up against 257 bone dry conditioned pounds! (Read 45119 times)

hipolito mejia · « **Reply #50 on:** December 27, 2008, 10:00:26 AM »

Quote from: G o a t b o y on December 26, 2008, 03:44:18 PM

Dorian wins

From the knees down.

...even though bodybuilding is not a sport!

Mr.1derful · « **Reply #51 on:** December 27, 2008, 11:05:35 AM »

Of course size doesn't always denote quality. Who's the marshmallow on the left?

NeoSeminole · « **Reply #52 on:** December 27, 2008, 05:41:29 PM »

a weight advantage means nothing when it's disguised by a wider waist, thicker joints, and flatter muscles.

QuakerOats · « **Reply #53 on:** December 27, 2008, 05:51:01 PM »

Quote from: NeoSeminole on December 27, 2008, 05:41:29 PM

a weight advantage means nothing when it's disguised by a wider waist, thicker joints, and flatter muscles.

Dorian is getting ABSOLUTELY DESTROYED by Ronnie in those shots.

io856 · « **Reply #54 on:** December 27, 2008, 05:52:29 PM »

Hurricane Beef ! · « **Reply #55 on:** December 27, 2008, 06:24:33 PM »

Now this thread has potential.

The Beef

Mr.1derful · « **Reply #56 on:** December 27, 2008, 08:25:29 PM »

Quote from: NeoSeminole on December 27, 2008, 05:41:29 PM

a weight advantage means nothing when it's disguised ~~by a wider waist, thicker joints, and flatter muscles~~ by toothpick forearms, nonexistent calves, a huge belly, over developed glutes and marshmallow conditioning.

Indeed.

England_1 · « **Reply #57 on:** December 27, 2008, 09:04:55 PM »

God damn, Dorian is murdering Coleman there!

NeoSeminole · « **Reply #58 on:** December 27, 2008, 10:03:43 PM »

Quote from: Mr.1derful on December 27, 2008, 08:25:29 PM

Indeed.

check the title of your own thread, dumbass.

"Proof that 247 pounds doesn't stack up against 257 bone dry conditioned pounds!"

why are you comparing 03 Ronnie when this discussion is about Ronnie at 247 lbs? Regardless, you used Dorian's 2 best poses in those comparisons. Ronnie would win all the other mandatories. Let's see Doughian up against this.

England_1 · « **Reply #59 on:** December 27, 2008, 10:07:46 PM »

Ronnie's balance and condition was off in 2003 compared to his best, 98.

Dorian wins the side tri, ab/thigh, rear lat spread, front double biceps, front lat spread, and rear double biceps. Ronnie wins the MM.

alnassak · « **Reply #60 on:** December 27, 2008, 10:29:21 PM »

I have no words to say just some pics to show

Ronnie is Faaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa aaaaaaaaaaaaaaar better than dorian please stop the theared there is no way to compare between them

Ronnie's fans please let Dorian's fans be happy at least on the forum and let them lie to their selves by saying Dorian is better Looooool just laugh with me Loooooool

Try Jay cuter Vs Dorian theared it will work better

** I chose the best year of dorian 95 (as you say always) and 99 + 03 coleman where he was not perfect ( as you alway say )

Mr.1derful · « **Reply #61 on:** December 27, 2008, 10:45:00 PM »

Quote from: NeoSeminole on December 27, 2008, 10:03:43 PM

check the title of your own thread, dumbass.

"Proof that 247 pounds doesn't stack up against 257 bone dry conditioned pounds!"

why are you comparing 03 Ronnie when this discussion is about Ronnie at 247 lbs? /

My posting of Ronnie in his 2003 form was in response to your assertion that a mass advantage is not of benefit when accompanied by less than desirable attributes. No bodybuilder has demonstrated this better than Ronnie. No matter what version of Ronnie you throw out there, Dorian will always have an answer. Dorian would expose the much touted 2003 Ronnie as being the Michelin man that he was (see pics below ). And even in top form at around 247 pounds, Ronnie would look stringy compared to the much denser and complete Yates physique, as the original most muscular comparison clearly showed.

England_1 · « **Reply #62 on:** December 27, 2008, 11:15:03 PM »

What's up with the fat rolls on Ronnie's neck

Great comparisons by the way Mr.1derful

Hulkster · « **Reply #63 on:** December 28, 2008, 12:22:54 AM »

Quote from: alnassak on December 27, 2008, 10:29:21 PM

I have no words to say just some pics to show

Ronnie is Faaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa aaaaaaaaaaaaaaar better than dorian please stop the theared there is no way to compare between them

Ronnie's fans please let Dorian's fans be happy at least on the forum and let them lie to their selves by saying Dorian is better Looooool just laugh with me Loooooool

Try Jay cuter Vs Dorian theared it will work better

** I chose the best year of dorian 95 (as you say always) and 99 + 03 coleman where he was not perfect ( as you alway say )

great comparisons.

ronnie is killing the keg as always.

dorian was only capable of beating the mid 90's ronnie that everyone else beat...

England_1 · « **Reply #64 on:** December 28, 2008, 12:27:15 AM »

Nice pregnant bitch tits on Coleman hahahah....Yates with way better taper!

England_1 · « **Reply #65 on:** December 28, 2008, 01:26:09 AM »

Quote from: David Duke on December 28, 2008, 12:29:21 AM

ronnie has an amazing ass, id love to slip between those tight buns.

yet another Hulkster gimmick account

johnny1 · « **Reply #66 on:** December 28, 2008, 01:41:01 AM »

Quote from: David Duke on December 28, 2008, 12:29:21 AM

ronnie has an amazing ass, id love to slip between those tight buns.

WTF

Mobil · « **Reply #67 on:** December 28, 2008, 01:42:32 AM »

truth is...... dorian riterd before his prime.... coleman had many more years on dorian.

Mobil · « **Reply #68 on:** December 28, 2008, 01:50:48 AM »

Quote from: England_1 on December 28, 2008, 12:27:15 AM

Nice pregnant bitch tits on Coleman hahahah....Yates with way better taper!

pics are photoshopped....... or im gonna use some exscuse for these pics!

alnassak · « **Reply #69 on:** December 28, 2008, 02:10:42 AM »

Look at how small is Dorian next to RONNIE

Sherief Shalaby · « **Reply #70 on:** December 28, 2008, 03:01:46 AM »

Nasser hands down.. This pic. of Nasser is from NOC 95 when his weight was 260 pounds (nearly the same weight as dorian in 95)..

m8 · « **Reply #71 on:** December 28, 2008, 03:08:41 AM »

Damn, Dorian is murdering Nasshole and Ronnie in those shots.

Hulkster · « **Reply #72 on:** December 28, 2008, 07:22:40 AM »

ronnie. 257 in 99

Hulkster · « **Reply #73 on:** December 28, 2008, 07:23:32 AM »

Quote from: alnassak on December 28, 2008, 02:10:42 AM

Look at how small is Dorian next to RONNIE

ronnie is murdering dorian

look at the aidsman quads compared and arms/delts compared to ronnie lol

Hulkster · « **Reply #74 on:** December 28, 2008, 07:25:51 AM »

many have said it, and it always holds true.

dorian had the worst arms in Mr. O. history...

look at this $:-\$

Author Topic: Proof that 247 pounds doesn't stack up against 257 bone dry conditioned pounds! (Read 45119 times)

io856