Author Topic: More on the CIA and Panetta...  (Read 555 times)

headhuntersix

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 17271
  • Our forefathers would be shooting by now
More on the CIA and Panetta...
« on: January 06, 2009, 08:48:19 AM »
http://www.cqpolitics.com/wmspage.cfm?docID=hsnews-000002993910

Send Dollar Bill to the CIA
By Jeff Stein, CQ Staff
Anyone connected to post-Sept. 11 “harsh interrogation measures,” no matter at arm’s length, is apparently disqualified to run Barack Obama ’s spy agency.

Hence the immolation of former National Counterterrorism Center chief John Brennan, the president-elect’s closest intelligence adviser, as the lead candidate to run the spy agency.

The left-wing hit job on Brennan showed that liberals may have a taste for covert action after all, the spooks chuckle.

“Almost anyone working at the agency since [Sept. 11] is tainted,” says retired CIA veteran Milt Bearden, a former Pakistan station chief, expressing the facts of life.

“If he wants experience, get an old-timer who left before that. Or go with a completely new face, maybe someone like a [Richard] Holbrooke, though I doubt he’d take it.”

Or get it. The veteran diplomat’s vice-chairmanship of a hedge fund is said to be problematic.

Can anybody who could do the job, get the job?

“Beats me,” said a well-wired former senior intelligence official. “Brennan’s hands were not very dirty at all. He was apparently thrown under the bus because some ill-informed bloggers thought they were [dirty] and the transition folks didn’t have the will to explain that they were wrong.”

A former national security official and friend of Brennan, who asked not to be identified, is disgusted by what happened.

“Ninety-nine percent of” what the CIA has been doing since Sept. 11 “is not related to torture, but now everybody is tarred with this brush,” he said.

“The dirty little secret, “ he added, “is that very little has been going on since [Sept. 11] that hasn’t gone on for the last 30 years.”

By that standard, almost anybody who’s worked in operations — like the much-touted former CIA station chief Jack Devine, or the current heads of the agency’s clandestine services, Stephen Kappes and Michael Sulick — has a skeleton in the closet.

“They are going to have to go outside of that circle,” says a recently retired CIA division chief
L

Straw Man

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41015
  • one dwells in nirvana
Re: More on the CIA and Panetta...
« Reply #1 on: January 06, 2009, 09:04:02 AM »
Some might say this qualifies as real CHANGE

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 39423
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: More on the CIA and Panetta...
« Reply #2 on: January 06, 2009, 09:09:24 AM »
Some might say this qualifies as real CHANGE

Yeah for the worse!

I myself want someone like Jack Bauer running the CIA, not Ramsey Clark.

The dope addict liberals really dont give a shit about innocent americans' lives if it means getting in the way of the politically correct, blame America first and always, panzie agenda.

Ask yourself this - if your wife was kidnapped and they caught a suspect who they knew had information as to her whereabouts - would you be against them pouring water over that persons' head to help get your wife back?  What about your kid if you could care less about your wife????

To me, the answer is simple. 

 

240 is Back

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 102396
  • Complete website for only $300- www.300website.com
Re: More on the CIA and Panetta...
« Reply #3 on: January 06, 2009, 09:12:22 AM »
Some might say this qualifies as real CHANGE

When he hires experienced people, repubs bitch that it's "More of the same".

When he hires inexperienced people, repubs bitch that it's "hiring idiots".

They're going to bitch no matter what.  The other guys in contention had previously defended torture.  This guy was very critical of it.   If you want to CHANGE things, you can't hire guys who liked it the OLD way.

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 39423
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: More on the CIA and Panetta...
« Reply #4 on: January 06, 2009, 09:14:52 AM »
When he hires experienced people, repubs bitch that it's "More of the same".

When he hires inexperienced people, repubs bitch that it's "hiring idiots".

They're going to bitch no matter what.  The other guys in contention had previously defended torture.  This guy was very critical of it.   If you want to CHANGE things, you can't hire guys who liked it the OLD way.

Did you see the movie:

The Path to 9/11?????

It is very clear that the Clinton CIA was severly impacted by Jamie Gorelick and her insane "Wall" that would not allow the CIA to do its job.

Is this what you want?

240 is Back

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 102396
  • Complete website for only $300- www.300website.com
Re: More on the CIA and Panetta...
« Reply #5 on: January 06, 2009, 09:16:18 AM »
Did you see the movie:

The Path to 9/11?????

It is very clear that the Clinton CIA was severly impacted by Jamie Gorelick and her insane "Wall" that would not allow the CIA to do its job.

Is this what you want?

I just want to make sure you're quoting an ABC "docu-drama" which was shown to have lots of factual inaccuracies...

You're really using a dramatic TV show as your source?









Really?

















Really??

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 39423
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: More on the CIA and Panetta...
« Reply #6 on: January 06, 2009, 09:36:07 AM »
I just want to make sure you're quoting an ABC "docu-drama" which was shown to have lots of factual inaccuracies...

You're really using a dramatic TV show as your source?









Really?

















Really??

The 9/11 Report clearly spelled out some of the issues that occurred during the 1990's regarding the CIA/FBI and the "Wall" instituted by Gorelick.