Chris Matthews after Bush Speech

[Eyeball Chambers]

Dude, tonymctones just said it very clearly:

BUSH KEPT US JUST AS SAFE AS CLINTON DID.

Actualyl, I diagree.  Clinton lost less than 30 ppl at the WTC.
Bush lost one hundred times more than that.

It's good to have a dash of common sense here and there.  

[tonymctones]

Dude, tonymctones just said it very clearly:

BUSH KEPT US JUST AS SAFE AS CLINTON DID.

Actualyl, I diagree.  Clinton lost less than 30 ppl at the WTC.
Bush lost one hundred times more than that.

LOL again WOW   you are a piece of fuking shit, id kick your fuking teeth in if i ever met your dumb ignorant ass.

[Eyeball Chambers]

LOL your comparing the attack which killed 6 to the attack which killed thousands and saying its the same situation? LOL seriously?

Seriously, we were supposedly attacked by extremist Muslims who hated us just as much in 1993 as they did in 2001.

Some how Clinton protected us from these enraged Arabs from 1993 to 2000.

Are you saying Bin Laden and his band of evil Arabs was more motivated post Clinton than they were in '93?

[tonymctones]

Dude, tonymctones just said it very clearly:

BUSH KEPT US JUST AS SAFE AS CLINTON DID.

Actualyl, I diagree.  Clinton lost less than 30 ppl at the WTC.
Bush lost one hundred times more than that.

LOL to argue that bush hasnt foiled plots or kept the country safe since 9/11 is an ignorant uphill battle

[tonymctones]

Seriously, we were supposedly attacked by extremist Muslims who hated us just as much in 1993 as they did in 2001.

Some how Clinton protected us from these enraged Arabs from 1993 to 2000.

it wasnt that clinton protected us its that the terrorist where inept you really think its the same situation? 6 ppl died as opposed to thousands but your right exactly the same

[240 is Back]

LOL your comparing the attack which killed 6 to the attack which killed thousands and saying its the same situation? LOL seriously?

Clinton lost 23 ppl (I think?) at the WTC in 1993.

Bush lost almsot 3000 people at the WTC in 2001.

Clinton was better at protecting us.

tonymctones just made this abundantly clear.  Clinton suffered a smaller attack, and Bush was unable to stop a massive one (with much more warnings).  If you worked anywhere above the 5th floor, chances are you'd have prefered a clinton presidency.

[Eyeball Chambers]

it wasnt that clinton protected us its that the terrorist where inept you really think its the same situation? 6 ppl died as opposed to thousands but your right exactly the same

So how do you know that the terrorists didn't get lucky on 9/11 but were "inept" after 9/11 (meaning Bush actually got lucky) like they were between 1993 and 2001?

See, the argument that Bush kept us safe just doesn't work.  

[Eyeball Chambers]

I would definitely label the guy who tried to light his shoes on fire as "inept". HAHA

[tonymctones]

So how do you know that the terrorists didn't get lucky on 9/11 but were "inept" after 9/11 (meaning Bush actually got lucky) like they were between 1993 and 2001?

See, the argument that Bush kept us safe just doesn't work.  

Yea is does many terroist plots and attempted attacks have been foiled since then have they not? this FACT lends itself to the concept that bushs policies and actions have kept us safe.

[Eyeball Chambers]

Yea is does many terroist plots and attempted attacks have been foiled since then have they not? this FACT lends itself to the concept that bushs policies and actions have kept us safe.

Yes, plots like the man who tried to light his shoes on fire.

Excellent detective work Bush! 

[240 is Back]

Yea is does many terroist plots and attempted attacks have been foiled since then have they not? this FACT lends itself to the concept that bushs policies and actions have kept us safe.

How many have been successful, in iraq?

4200 and counting?

[tonymctones]

Yes, plots like the man who tried to light his shoes on fire.

Excellent detective work Bush! 

your are asserting that no terrorist plots or attacks have been foiled since 9/11?

[240 is Back]

your are asserting that no terrorist plots or attacks have been foiled since 9/11?

yeah, what about the one in the UK where we had to stop all those hijackers (who didn't own passports hahaha) from blowing up planes.

hey, didn't 80% of them get released with no charges?  Hmmmmm

[Eyeball Chambers]

your are asserting that no terrorist plots or attacks have been foiled since 9/11?

No, I'm asserting that you can't prove that the Bush administrations despicable tactics have foiled any terror attacks on the United States, including the attack in 2001 when so many innocent Americans were killed.

[tonymctones]

No, I'm asserting that you can't prove that the Bush administrations despicable tactics have foiled any terror attacks on the United States, including the attack in 2001 when so many innocent Americans were killed.

http://www.heritage.org/research/HomelandDefense/bg2085.cfm

U.S. Thwarts 19 Terrorist Attacks Against America Since 9/11

[Eyeball Chambers]

http://www.heritage.org/research/HomelandDefense/bg2085.cfm

U.S. Thwarts 19 Terrorist Attacks Against America Since 9/11

You can prove that it was the Bush administrations tactics that were responsible for thwarting those attacks?

[tonymctones]

You can prove that it was the Bush administrations tactics that were responsible for thwarting those attacks?

LOL Combating terrorism is essential for keeping Amer­ica safe, free, and prosperous.

"Counterterrorism operations have uncovered threats that in some cases, although less sophisticated than the 9/11 attacks and at most loosely affiliated with "al-Qaeda" central, could have resulted in signifi­cant loss of life and property if they had been con­ducted successfully.

The best means to prevent terrorist attacks is effective intelligence collection, information sharing, and coordinated, determined counterterrorism opera­tions that can stop attacks before they are mounted.

Effective operations often require federal, state, local, and international cooperation."

You are implying that none of the actions taken by bush have resulted in us being safer? LOL seriously?

[Eyeball Chambers]

thats not what i got from that but again if it is then there is no need for an investigation b/c he openly admits it so it should if it has traction that is go straight to prosecution. At any rate i agree with what he has done although i actually do believe that it is a violation of the constitution certain things need to be done its just the simple fact of the matter. freedom isnt free

Enough said, you can't prove Bush has even kept us safe yet you believe and accept (even support the fact) that he has violated our Constitution.

Case closed

[tonymctones]

Enough said, you can't prove Bush has even kept us safe yet you believe and accept (even support the fact) that he has violated our Constitution.

Case closed

LOL when did i say i couldnt prove anything i just gave you 19 cases in which terrorist plots where foiled many of which with the help of homeland security, local police, and other support systems.

what does that quote have to do with anything?

LOL maybe you dont understand but certain things will be sacrificed to keep us safe i suppose youd rather him turn a blind eye to it?

[BM OUT]

i very clearly remember the wet spot of a presidency that clinton left.
That wet spot was body fluids and intern sweat.

Turns out Bush left his own wet spot too.
This one is wet with blood of American troops and mothers' tears.

The wet spot in that video is the spittle that flies out of Mathews mouth.God what a dickhead he is.

[mightymouse72]

i very clearly remember the wet spot of a presidency that clinton left.
That wet spot was body fluids and intern sweat.

Turns out Bush left his own wet spot too.
This one is wet with blood of American troops and mothers' tears.

You put shame on every soldier and their family that has fought and died for this country.

You are total and complete pile of garbage.

Because you think the war was based on lies doesn’t give you the right to say things like that.


And may I join Tony Mc in kicking your teeth in.

[Soul Crusher]

Anyone see Chris Matthews after Bush's speech?

Pretty dead on IMO.

He didn't get a tingle up his leg?

[mightymouse72]

9/11 was planned during Clinton years.  THAT'S A FACT.

9/11 was executed during Bush years.

They didn't start planning it in January of 2001.


Question:  If we are attacked again on a similar scale in September of 2009, who will you moonbats blame it on??? 

Bush or Obama??


Careful how you answer.

[Soul Crusher]

Clinton lost 23 ppl (I think?) at the WTC in 1993.

Bush lost almsot 3000 people at the WTC in 2001.

Clinton was better at protecting us.

tonymctones just made this abundantly clear.  Clinton suffered a smaller attack, and Bush was unable to stop a massive one (with much more warnings).  If you worked anywhere above the 5th floor, chances are you'd have prefered a clinton presidency.

Hey morons, the plot for 9/11 was started in 1995 and Bin Laden even said that he thought the weakness we showed in Somalia and the Cole proved we were paper tigers. 

[mightymouse72]

Hey morons, the plot for 9/11 was started in 1995 and Bin Laden even said that he thought the weakness we showed in Somalia and the Cole proved we were paper tigers. 

Exacty!

Why do you think Bin-laden attacked us and Saddam thumbed his nose at us for years??

Beacause they have both said the U.S. DID NOT have the stomach for war.
Because of Clinton they thought that and he proved them right.

Thank God Bush proved them wrong!!