Author Topic: Not the best structure etc... Martin 1 day out  (Read 3580 times)

spinnis

  • Guest
Not the best structure etc... Martin 1 day out
« on: January 23, 2009, 07:01:10 AM »
But at 300 pounds and in this shape. Thats kinda amazing.
To bad about his structure though :(

But looks great in this pose!




burn2live

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3698
Re: Not the best structure etc... Martin 1 day out
« Reply #1 on: January 23, 2009, 07:07:23 AM »
But at 300 pounds and in this shape. Thats kinda amazing.
To bad about his structure though :(

But looks great in this pose!





Looks dry as fuck

QuakerOats

  • Time Out
  • Getbig V
  • *
  • Posts: 13621
  • bring amberlamps!!!
Re: Not the best structure etc... Martin 1 day out
« Reply #2 on: January 23, 2009, 07:09:42 AM »
But at 300 pounds and in this shape. Thats kinda amazing.
To bad about his structure though :(

But looks great in this pose!




nothing wrong with his "structure", dumbass.

spinnis

  • Guest
Re: Not the best structure etc... Martin 1 day out
« Reply #3 on: January 23, 2009, 07:11:14 AM »
nothing wrong with his "structure", dumbass.

Way to wide waist and bad arms..

But as big as they come :)

Relentless

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2807
  • Kevin Levrone is the genetic ideal.
Re: Not the best structure etc... Martin 1 day out
« Reply #4 on: January 23, 2009, 07:11:59 AM »
Another Heiko Kallbach.

spinnis

  • Guest
Re: Not the best structure etc... Martin 1 day out
« Reply #5 on: January 23, 2009, 07:12:06 AM »

BayGBM

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 19460
Re: Not the best structure etc... Martin 1 day out
« Reply #6 on: January 23, 2009, 07:13:56 AM »
Most Muscular winner!  :D

spinnis

  • Guest
Re: Not the best structure etc... Martin 1 day out
« Reply #7 on: January 23, 2009, 07:15:21 AM »



Epic right delt and glute injection swelling  ;D

But I hope he places in the top 10 at least.

Mr. Magoo

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 9808
  • THE most mistaken identity on getbig
Re: Not the best structure etc... Martin 1 day out
« Reply #8 on: January 23, 2009, 07:16:24 AM »
dude is dry

lovemonkey

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7750
  • Two kinds of people; Those that can extrapolate
Re: Not the best structure etc... Martin 1 day out
« Reply #9 on: January 23, 2009, 07:16:31 AM »
But at 300 pounds and in this shape. Thats kinda amazing.
To bad about his structure though :(

But looks great in this pose!





Is this really 300 pounds? He better be a tall fuckah
from incomplete data

spinnis

  • Guest
Re: Not the best structure etc... Martin 1 day out
« Reply #10 on: January 23, 2009, 07:17:36 AM »
Is this really 300 pounds? He better be a tall fuckah

6 foot.

Yes he is a legit 300 pounder in that conditioning.

he is 330+ with abs offseason

QuakerOats

  • Time Out
  • Getbig V
  • *
  • Posts: 13621
  • bring amberlamps!!!
Re: Not the best structure etc... Martin 1 day out
« Reply #11 on: January 23, 2009, 07:18:06 AM »
Is this really 300 pounds? He better be a tall fuckah
hahaha, no fucckin' way he's 300 there, i think they mean 300 offseason, he looks about 250 there, still huge.

CalvinH

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22014
  • Spastic Tarted Cvunt
Re: Not the best structure etc... Martin 1 day out
« Reply #12 on: January 23, 2009, 07:23:19 AM »
hahaha, no fucckin' way he's 300 there, i think they mean 300 offseason, he looks about 250 there, still huge.



You've got pretty good structure yourself you Missouri man mountain.

lovemonkey

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7750
  • Two kinds of people; Those that can extrapolate
Re: Not the best structure etc... Martin 1 day out
« Reply #13 on: January 23, 2009, 07:23:41 AM »
6 foot.

Yes he is a legit 300 pounder in that conditioning.

he is 330+ with abs offseason

Dude even if he's tall he should look coleman-like at that weight. He doesn't.
from incomplete data

QuakerOats

  • Time Out
  • Getbig V
  • *
  • Posts: 13621
  • bring amberlamps!!!
Re: Not the best structure etc... Martin 1 day out
« Reply #14 on: January 23, 2009, 07:24:16 AM »


You've got pretty good structure yourself you Missouri man mountain.
your physique isn'f half bad yourself, Part Time Florida Fornicator.

spinnis

  • Guest
Re: Not the best structure etc... Martin 1 day out
« Reply #15 on: January 23, 2009, 07:25:33 AM »
hahaha, no fucckin' way he's 300 there, i think they mean 300 offseason, he looks about 250 there, still huge.

check MD video. He stands on the scale I think  :)

He is legit 300+

QuakerOats

  • Time Out
  • Getbig V
  • *
  • Posts: 13621
  • bring amberlamps!!!
Re: Not the best structure etc... Martin 1 day out
« Reply #16 on: January 23, 2009, 07:27:08 AM »
check MD video. He stands on the scale I think  :)

He is legit 300+
if he's 300 PRE CONTEST then he must have concrete bones and steel ligaments because his muscle mass doesn't look 300, he looks great but NO FUCCKING WAY is he 300 contest shape.

spinnis

  • Guest
Re: Not the best structure etc... Martin 1 day out
« Reply #17 on: January 23, 2009, 07:27:21 AM »
Here he is with a friend of mine



he is a biiiiiig dude and will dwarf everyone on stage, but wont win lol =)

Even Dennis James wash Impressed with his size and said he will dwarf everyone..

spinnis

  • Guest
Re: Not the best structure etc... Martin 1 day out
« Reply #18 on: January 23, 2009, 07:28:24 AM »
if he's 300 PRE CONTEST then he must have concrete bones and steel ligaments because his muscle mass doesn't look 300, he looks great but NO FUCCKING WAY is he 300 contest shape.

320-330 pounds offseason about 295 on stage. gonna see im I can find some scale photos, because I know he and his coach aint lying :)

Mars

  • Time Out
  • Getbig V
  • *
  • Posts: 27707
Re: Not the best structure etc... Martin 1 day out
« Reply #19 on: January 23, 2009, 07:29:53 AM »
i wish my arms were that bad.

dr.chimps

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 28635
  • Chimpus ergo sum
Re: Not the best structure etc... Martin 1 day out
« Reply #20 on: January 23, 2009, 07:29:58 AM »
But at 300 pounds and in this shape. Thats kinda amazing.
To bad about his structure though :(

But looks great in this pose!
Most likely to die of a heart attack in a hotel room with brutal decor?

spinnis

  • Guest
Re: Not the best structure etc... Martin 1 day out
« Reply #21 on: January 23, 2009, 07:30:11 AM »


325 offseason

BayGBM

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 19460
Re: Not the best structure etc... Martin 1 day out
« Reply #22 on: January 23, 2009, 07:31:06 AM »
320-330 pounds offseason about 295 on stage. gonna see im I can find some scale photos, because I know he and his coach aint lying :)

Don't waste your time.  We know he is 300lbs.  No need to convince the nonbelievers.

QuakerOats

  • Time Out
  • Getbig V
  • *
  • Posts: 13621
  • bring amberlamps!!!
Re: Not the best structure etc... Martin 1 day out
« Reply #23 on: January 23, 2009, 07:31:15 AM »
320-330 pounds offseason about 295 on stage. gonna see im I can find some scale photos, because I know he and his coach aint lying :)
i don't give two shits what the scale says, i'm saying he doesn't LOOK 300 pounds.

lovemonkey

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7750
  • Two kinds of people; Those that can extrapolate
Re: Not the best structure etc... Martin 1 day out
« Reply #24 on: January 23, 2009, 07:32:13 AM »
Here is is with a friend of mine



he is a biiiiiig dude and will dwarf everyone on stage, but wont win lol =)

Even Dennis James wash Impressed with his size and said he will dwarf everyone..

That "friend" of your looks pretty bangable.
from incomplete data