Author Topic: Bank bailout could cost $4 trillion!  (Read 379 times)

Bindare_Dundat

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 12227
  • KILL CENTRAL BANKS, BUY BITCOIN.
Bank bailout could cost $4 trillion!
« on: January 27, 2009, 07:35:04 AM »
Banks don't have enough capital to fix their problems, which means the Obama administration may need a lot more money to clean up the financial mess.

NEW YORK (Fortune) -- The cost of the bank bailout is likely to be much higher than $700 billion.

While the Obama administration hasn't asked Congress for more money yet, some experts warn that government spending on support for struggling financial services companies will ultimately reach into the trillions of dollars.

The first half of the controversial $700 billion program to help banks has already been spent -- mostly on buying up preferred shares of troubled banks.

Part of the remaining $350 billion may be used to purchase troubled assets from bank balance sheets and place them in what Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. chief Sheila Bair has dubbed an "aggregator bank."

And while taxpayers will surely recover some of that sum eventually, more money is likely to be needed in order for the bank rescue to work.

"The amount of working capital you'd expect the government to take into this would be around $3 trillion to $4 trillion," said Simon Johnson, a senior fellow at the Peterson Institute for International Economics and author of its Baseline Scenario financial crisis blog.

http://money.cnn.com/2009/01/27/guy.bailout.fortune/index.htm?postversion=2009012704

Hereford

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4028
Re: Bank bailout could cost $4 trillion!
« Reply #1 on: January 27, 2009, 08:41:27 AM »
OK now I have a question....

In the 80's Reagan pushed the concept of 'Trickle Down' economics. The way I understand it is that if you give it to the rich it filters down the food chain to the poor eventually, right?

Isn't that the same thing the gubment is doing now? The banks are getting trillions of 'free' dollars, in hopes they will kick some out to borrowers at some point. If I were a large bank, and I got a stimulius payment... why would I lend that money out instead of sending all the top exects to a resort for a week?

Do I understand this correctly?

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41759
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: Bank bailout could cost $4 trillion!
« Reply #2 on: January 27, 2009, 08:44:17 AM »
OK now I have a question....

In the 80's Reagan pushed the concept of 'Trickle Down' economics. The way I understand it is that if you give it to the rich it filters down the food chain to the poor eventually, right?

Isn't that the same thing the gubment is doing now? The banks are getting trillions of 'free' dollars, in hopes they will kick some out to borrowers at some point. If I were a large bank, and I got a stimulius payment... why would I lend that money out instead of sending all the top exects to a resort for a week?

Do I understand this correctly?

The Bush/Obama bailout is a disgrace and a heist.

shootfighter1

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5674
  • Competitor- NABBA Nationals Overall Champ
Re: Bank bailout could cost $4 trillion!
« Reply #3 on: January 27, 2009, 08:57:46 AM »
Its not trickle down economics if only the bank executives are benefiting.  Its a poorly managed grant!

stormshadow

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1655
  • Getbig!
Re: Bank bailout could cost $4 trillion!
« Reply #4 on: January 27, 2009, 09:01:51 AM »
OK now I have a question....

In the 80's Reagan pushed the concept of 'Trickle Down' economics. The way I understand it is that if you give it to the rich it filters down the food chain to the poor eventually, right?

Isn't that the same thing the gubment is doing now? The banks are getting trillions of 'free' dollars, in hopes they will kick some out to borrowers at some point. If I were a large bank, and I got a stimulius payment... why would I lend that money out instead of sending all the top exects to a resort for a week?

Do I understand this correctly?

Banks do not lend money.  They create it by monetizing your promissory note (your loan application).  The money you get from the bank when you are "approved" for a loan is literally created on the spot in the computer.  In banking, the assets must always balance the liabilities. 

Your promissory note is an asset - the bank balances it by creating a liability (your loan money).  I also believe that banks will use your promissory note (bank asset) as "reserves" to create additional money. 

So you can see that the bank does not need much money to create money.