Author Topic: Best Most Muscular Pose of all time? (Hijacked by Hulkster's man-love for Ronnie (Read 79005 times)

Sharma · « **Reply #125 on:** February 07, 2009, 04:39:32 PM »

Quote from: Hulkster on February 07, 2009, 04:34:36 PM

wrong.

Coleman bests Nasser in EVERY bodypart from the front except the abs and calves.

Nasser has inferior quads, pecs, arms, delts etc. and inferior detail too..

abs and calves don't make up for all that..

actually they do here - in a most muscular comparison. i do not agree with your assumptions anyway but the overall aesthetic of ronnie here is not as good as nasser precisely because the waist is not tighter and there is simply joke calves. there are other poses where specific bodyparts are compared to each but here the emphasis is on overall muscularity and nasser's waist gives him a better, wider taper and an x frame with his enormous calves.

bigbobs · « **Reply #126 on:** February 07, 2009, 04:41:12 PM »

Quote from: Hulkster on February 07, 2009, 04:34:36 PM

wrong.

Coleman bests Nasser in EVERY bodypart from the front except the abs and calves.

Nasser has inferior quads, pecs, arms, delts etc. and inferior detail too..

abs and calves don't make up for all that..

WRONG. Nasser's has better quads and much better abs and calves. Delts, arms and chest are comparable. Nasser wins.

Quote from: Hulkster on February 07, 2009, 04:32:41 PM

in other words, you know I am correct

so does Nasser:

Your delusionality leads to you posting comparable shots where you are the only one who believes Ronnie looks better in them.

Sharma · « **Reply #127 on:** February 07, 2009, 04:41:42 PM »

Quote from: bigbobs on February 07, 2009, 04:38:38 PM

Great post Sharma, I would also like to add that Ronnie had weak abs as calves as well. Nasser and Ronnie were both detailed mass monsters in the MM pose but Nasser had no flaws while Ronnie lacked abs and calves. Simple as that.

QFT. no one is saying that Ronnie was not amazing but in the most muscular everything needs to be developed - nothing dominating and nothing weak. Ronnie's calves and abs destroy it for him here.

bigbobs · « **Reply #128 on:** February 07, 2009, 04:43:12 PM »

Quote from: Sharma on February 07, 2009, 04:41:42 PM

QFT. no one is saying that Ronnie was not amazing but in the most muscular everything needs to be developed - nothing dominating and nothing weak. Ronnie's calves and abs destroy it for him here.

Ronnie basically had 4 abs, while Nasser has 8

dr.chimps · « **Reply #129 on:** February 07, 2009, 04:44:22 PM »

Quote from: Sharma on February 07, 2009, 04:39:32 PM

actually they do here - in a most muscular comparison. i do not agree with your assumptions anyway but the overall aesthetic of ronnie here is not as good as nasser precisely because the waist is not tighter and there is simply joke calves. there are other poses where specific bodyparts are compared to each but here the emphasis is on overall muscularity and nasser's waist gives him a better, wider taper and an x frame with his enormous calves.

Hi Sharma. Got a sharper/cleaner pic of Nasser than that 8mm frame '60's porn pic. Just wondering.

Alex23 · « **Reply #130 on:** February 07, 2009, 04:44:59 PM »

Quote from: bigbobs on February 07, 2009, 04:43:12 PM

Ronnie basically had 4 abs, while Nasser has 8

Ronnie basically has 8 O trophies, while Nasser has... none

Relentless · « **Reply #131 on:** February 07, 2009, 04:45:38 PM »

Quote from: Alex23 on February 07, 2009, 04:44:59 PM

Ronnie basically has 8 O trophies, while Nasser has... none

Exactly.

dr.chimps · « **Reply #132 on:** February 07, 2009, 04:46:35 PM »

Quote from: Alex23 on February 07, 2009, 04:44:59 PM

Ronnie basically has 8 O trophies, while Nasser has... none

BOOOOOOOOM

/would have been funnier with 8 emoticons, alex!

Sharma · « **Reply #133 on:** February 07, 2009, 04:47:10 PM »

Quote from: Alex23 on February 07, 2009, 04:44:59 PM

Ronnie basically has 8 O trophies, while Nasser has... none

which proves nothing except that the judging is an absolute joke

Sharma · « **Reply #134 on:** February 07, 2009, 04:48:50 PM »

there is no BOOM to be had here. Ronnie did NOT deserve a few of those and Nasser did deserve 3 Olympias

bigbobs · « **Reply #135 on:** February 07, 2009, 04:49:49 PM »

Quote from: Sharma on February 07, 2009, 04:47:10 PM

which proves nothing except that the judging is an absolute joke

and the fact that Ronnie was in his prime when the competition was weaker.

Take them both in their primes and Nasser wins the MM pose.

grab an umbrella · « **Reply #136 on:** February 07, 2009, 04:50:49 PM »

Quote from: Sharma on February 07, 2009, 04:48:50 PM

there is no BOOM to be had here. Ronnie did NOT deserve a few of those and Nasser did deserve 3 Olympias

There is nothing wrong with having a favorite bodybuilder or anything like that. You and your crew of muscle worshipers are taking it a little bit far. Nasser was a great bodybuilder, but by no means is he the greatest.

Alex23 · « **Reply #137 on:** February 07, 2009, 04:51:37 PM »

Quote from: Sharma on February 07, 2009, 04:48:50 PM

there is no BOOM to be had here. Ronnie did NOT deserve a few of those and Nasser did deserve 3 Olympias

hahahahahaha poor dellusionites, I like Nasser and he did have a tremendous physique at his peak.. ... just not mr olympia material. End of the story and get over it once and for all.

Sharma · « **Reply #138 on:** February 07, 2009, 04:52:28 PM »

Quote from: bigbobs on February 07, 2009, 04:49:49 PM

and the fact that Ronnie was in his prime when the competition was weaker.

Take them both in their primes and Nasser wins the MM pose.

yes, Coleman won in a much more easy transition era. Nasser competed in the greatest ever era. Levrone, Flex, Ray all these guys at their best. He was robbed of 3 Olympias and Ronnie was nowhere. Ronnie could not even dream to compete in this time. Terrible placings.

dr.chimps · « **Reply #139 on:** February 07, 2009, 04:52:37 PM »

Quote from: grab an umbrella on February 07, 2009, 04:50:49 PM

There is nothing wrong with having a favorite bodybuilder or anything like that. You and your crew of muscle worshipers are taking it a little bit far. Nasser was a great bodybuilder, but by no means is he the greatest.

Stone Him!!!!!!

bigbobs · « **Reply #140 on:** February 07, 2009, 04:52:46 PM »

Quote from: grab an umbrella on February 07, 2009, 04:50:49 PM

Nasser was a great bodybuilder, and was ~~but by no means is he~~ the greatest.

Fixed

Sharma · « **Reply #141 on:** February 07, 2009, 04:55:15 PM »

Quote from: Alex23 on February 07, 2009, 04:51:37 PM

hahahahahaha poor dellusionites, I like Nasser and he did have a tremendous physique at his peak.. ... but he did not deserve 3 mr olympias, he deserved 5

I agree. Good post.

Hulkster · « **Reply #142 on:** February 07, 2009, 08:10:40 PM »

Quote

Delts, arms and chest are comparable

bullshit.

compare them both at their prime and Ronnie's upper body (delts, arms and chest) crushes, yes, crushes Nasser's:

you need to have more than just better calves going for you to beat Ronnie's mm.

sorry.

Hulkster · « **Reply #143 on:** February 07, 2009, 08:16:20 PM »

I find it funny that even waaaaay back in 1996 ronnie's chest was better than Nasser's, and Nasser was at his peak LOL

sorry nasser fans, your hero couldnt even carry a 1998+ Ronnie's gym bag!

IceCold · « **Reply #144 on:** February 07, 2009, 08:26:06 PM »

typical delusional hulkster - i see that nothing has changed.

do you realize that in 99, nasser had 30 lbs. on ronnie?

ronnie at his best was 250 and nasser was probably 285.

if nasser's back were better, he would have easily won in 98, 99, etc.

saucetradomous · « **Reply #145 on:** February 07, 2009, 08:28:01 PM »

The real question is.. who has the best mm pose on getbig?

QuakerOats · « **Reply #146 on:** February 07, 2009, 08:28:40 PM »

Quote from: saucetradomous on February 07, 2009, 08:28:01 PM

The real question is.. who has the best mm pose on getbig?

saucetradomous · « **Reply #147 on:** February 07, 2009, 08:30:59 PM »

Quote from: QuakerOats on February 07, 2009, 08:28:40 PM

Mexican mustache pose?

Sherief Shalaby · « **Reply #148 on:** February 07, 2009, 08:36:58 PM »

Quote from: Hulkster on February 07, 2009, 08:16:20 PM

I find it funny that even waaaaay back in 1996 ronnie's chest was better than Nasser's, and Nasser was at his peak LOL

sorry nasser fans, your hero couldnt even carry a 1998+ Ronnie's gym bag!

i consider ronnie's chest one of his weak points.. specially when it's relaxed.. his upper chest is great but the shape of his lower chest doesnt look ok.. but yes its weakness doesnt appear in this particular pose..

Sherief Shalaby · « **Reply #149 on:** February 07, 2009, 08:39:16 PM »

at their best both ronnie and nasser had big detailed quads but nasser's looked much better.. also ronnie's huge quads exposed more the weakness of his calves..