Author Topic: Ideal natural physique  (Read 52868 times)

QuakerOats

  • Time Out
  • Getbig V
  • *
  • Posts: 13621
  • bring amberlamps!!!
Re: Ideal natural physique
« Reply #275 on: February 17, 2009, 05:45:59 PM »
I dont think you even lift at all.
hahahahahaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa, dude have you even ever seen a pic of Hazbin? the dude was a compeitior at one point and was like 240 onstage, dude has one of the freakiest pairs of forearms you'll ever see, absolutely monstrous upper body as well.

polychronopolous

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 19041
Re: Ideal natural physique
« Reply #276 on: February 17, 2009, 05:46:59 PM »
hahahahahaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa, dude have you even ever seen a pic of Hazbin? the dude was a compeitior at one point and was like 240 onstage, dude has one of the freakiest pairs of forearms you'll ever see, absolutely monstrous upper body as well.

Some of the most vascular forearms I have ever seen for sure.
Hazbins a tank.

QuakerOats

  • Time Out
  • Getbig V
  • *
  • Posts: 13621
  • bring amberlamps!!!
Re: Ideal natural physique
« Reply #277 on: February 17, 2009, 05:49:21 PM »
Some of the most vascular forearms I have ever seen for sure.
Hazbins a tank.
he's probably the most jacked non pro on this board for sure.

Fatpanda

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 9676
  • One getbigger to rule them all.
Re: Ideal natural physique
« Reply #278 on: February 17, 2009, 05:53:33 PM »
where is hazbins pics ?
175lbs by 31st July

polychronopolous

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 19041
Re: Ideal natural physique
« Reply #279 on: February 17, 2009, 05:53:49 PM »
he's probably the most jacked non pro on this board for sure.

Don't worry about this James001 fella, I simply asked him to clarify a statement he made on another thread a few minutes ago and all of the sudden he thinks he is some badass intellectual Mensa-type who can go around insulting people at the drop of a hat.

Ursus

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 11338
  • Getbig!
Re: Ideal natural physique
« Reply #280 on: February 17, 2009, 05:56:33 PM »
to be fair bench press wasnt even invented in the 1930's

and diet is the biggest diff between contest lean then and now.

anyway i never fully read thread so i dont know whats being argued so ill stay out lol

TacoBell

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4664
  • Team FTN
Re: Ideal natural physique
« Reply #281 on: February 17, 2009, 05:59:26 PM »
he's probably the most jacked non pro on this board for sure.

Youre not exactly a featherweight yourself, QO.
 ;D

liberalismo

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1335
Re: Ideal natural physique
« Reply #282 on: February 17, 2009, 06:02:33 PM »
to be fair bench press wasnt even invented in the 1930's

and diet is the biggest diff between contest lean then and now.

anyway i never fully read thread so i dont know whats being argued so ill stay out lol


Jackasses are arguing that People bodybuilding naturally in the 30s and 40s are as big as anyone can naturally get and that nutrition, supplements and modern equipment has no effect.


They are also viciously arguing that Layne Norton and Doug Miller are not natural.

TacoBell

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4664
  • Team FTN
Re: Ideal natural physique
« Reply #283 on: February 17, 2009, 06:05:16 PM »

Jackasses are arguing that People bodybuilding naturally in the 30s and 40s are as big as anyone can naturally get and that nutrition, supplements and modern equipment has no effect.


They are also viciously arguing that Layne Norton and Doug Miller are not natural.

Hate to break the news, but the Tooth Fairy isnt real either.
Sorry.

Emmortal

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5660
Re: Ideal natural physique
« Reply #284 on: February 17, 2009, 06:05:32 PM »
hahahahahaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa, dude have you even ever seen a pic of Hazbin? the dude was a compeitior at one point and was like 240 onstage, dude has one of the freakiest pairs of forearms you'll ever see, absolutely monstrous upper body as well.

Pretty sure he was being sarcastic and going along with what hazbin was saying.

Ursus

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 11338
  • Getbig!
Re: Ideal natural physique
« Reply #285 on: February 17, 2009, 06:05:50 PM »
i doubt that we peaked in terms of bbuilding in the 1930's, no way in hell.

layne i believe could easily be nattie. Doug if he is is very very very gifted. Natties at 260lbs and strong as a bull is not that rare. However that thick look and that combo of cuts in doug is rare as hens teeth.

Rob Hope is an incredible natural bbuilder.

I hope that they both are. Something to strive for

MuscleMcMannus

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6236
Re: Ideal natural physique
« Reply #286 on: February 17, 2009, 06:07:38 PM »

Jackasses are arguing that People bodybuilding naturally in the 30s and 40s are as big as anyone can naturally get and that nutrition, supplements and modern equipment has no effect.


They are also viciously arguing that Layne Norton and Doug Miller are not natural.

Haha no that is not the entire point of this debate.  Major slant there buddy!  You're claiming Layne Norton and Doug Miller are natural.  Implying that at 27 years old what took bodybuilders decades to build (i.e. Jack Lalanne at 40) has taken guys like Norton a few years and Norton still looks ten times more ripped and vascular in contest prep.  That's absurd.  And you're also claiming it's ok for "natural" bodybuilders to use ephedrine and caffeine pills and claim they are natural.  

MuscleMcMannus

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6236
Re: Ideal natural physique
« Reply #287 on: February 17, 2009, 06:08:44 PM »
i doubt that we peaked in terms of bbuilding in the 1930's, no way in hell.

layne i believe could easily be nattie. Doug if he is is very very very gifted. Natties at 260lbs and strong as a bull is not that rare. However that thick look and that combo of cuts in doug is rare as hens teeth.

Rob Hope is an incredible natural bbuilder.

I hope that they both are. Something to strive for

No one ever said bodybuilding peaked in the 1930's.  That's absurd.  And that was not the premise of this debate. 

tommywishbone

  • Competitors II
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 20535
  • Biscuit
Re: Ideal natural physique
« Reply #288 on: February 17, 2009, 06:09:41 PM »
"... if Stallone didn't tell us he used steroids, we wouldn't know..."

  >:( I must now kill myself.
a

MuscleMcMannus

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6236
Re: Ideal natural physique
« Reply #289 on: February 17, 2009, 06:10:30 PM »
i doubt that we peaked in terms of bbuilding in the 1930's, no way in hell.

layne i believe could easily be nattie. Doug if he is is very very very gifted. Natties at 260lbs and strong as a bull is not that rare. However that thick look and that combo of cuts in doug is rare as hens teeth.

Rob Hope is an incredible natural bbuilder.

I hope that they both are. Something to strive for

HAHA Oh Brother.............Rob Hope is natural?  What the fuck is wrong with you European guys?  Are you all really that dumb?  Come on Goudy where's that common sense I thought you had!  

http://www.247bodybuilding.com/rob_hope.htm

If anyone thinks Hope is natural they are fucking clueless!  This thread is a joke!

TacoBell

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4664
  • Team FTN
Re: Ideal natural physique
« Reply #290 on: February 17, 2009, 06:10:51 PM »
ACH also admitted to using M1T and Superdrol, yet he still claims 'natural' status.
See the problem with 'naturals'.

Ursus

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 11338
  • Getbig!
Re: Ideal natural physique
« Reply #291 on: February 17, 2009, 06:18:30 PM »
HAHA Oh Brother.............Rob Hope is natural?  What the fuck is wrong with you European guys?  Are you all really that dumb?  Come on Goudy where's that common sense I thought you had!  

http://www.247bodybuilding.com/rob_hope.htm

If anyone thinks Hope is natural they are fucking clueless!  This thread is a joke!

you must be bitter or have god awful genetics.

I like you and your posts seem usually well informed etc. However...

Bear in mind there are like 5 nattues in the world whosestatus is questioned. Its not like the IFBB where everyone is clearly on juice. I like to give benefit of doubt as much as i can.

I will stand by my point

TacoBell

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4664
  • Team FTN
Re: Ideal natural physique
« Reply #292 on: February 17, 2009, 06:21:54 PM »
you must be bitter or have god awful genetics.

I like you and your posts seem usually well informed etc. However...

Bear in mind there are like 5 nattues in the world whosestatus is questioned. Its not like the IFBB where everyone is clearly on juice. I like to give benefit of doubt as much as i can.

I will stand by my point

Yes, it is.

Ursus

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 11338
  • Getbig!
Re: Ideal natural physique
« Reply #293 on: February 17, 2009, 06:24:01 PM »
skip lacour, rob hope, jeff willet, doug, layne and jrod

Only naturals in world out of million competitive naturals who people debate about.

Eisenherz

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1312
  • Uber oder unter?
Re: Ideal natural physique
« Reply #294 on: February 17, 2009, 06:25:12 PM »
skip lacour, rob hope, jeff willet, doug, layne and jrod

Only naturals in world out of million competitive naturals who people debate about.

Serge Nubret is natural, he even said so.

TacoBell

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4664
  • Team FTN
Re: Ideal natural physique
« Reply #295 on: February 17, 2009, 06:26:44 PM »
Yohnnie Shambourger was natural...even did the Masters O...
 ::)

MuscleMcMannus

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6236
Re: Ideal natural physique
« Reply #296 on: February 17, 2009, 06:35:20 PM »
skip lacour, rob hope, jeff willet, doug, layne and jrod

Only naturals in world out of million competitive naturals who people debate about.

 Goudy my genetics don't suck although I'm 6'5 and even if they did or didn't that would have no bearing on the discussion.  I'm not bitter.  I'm happy with my physique and where I'm headed.  In fact I'm injury free at 29 and my best years are ahead of me. 
IF you believe Skip LaCour was natural you're nuts!  Same thing with Jeff Willet. Come on bro! 

liberalismo

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1335
Re: Ideal natural physique
« Reply #297 on: February 17, 2009, 06:56:29 PM »
Goudy my genetics don't suck although I'm 6'5 and even if they did or didn't that would have no bearing on the discussion.  I'm not bitter.  I'm happy with my physique and where I'm headed.  In fact I'm injury free at 29 and my best years are ahead of me. 
IF you believe Skip LaCour was natural you're nuts!  Same thing with Jeff Willet. Come on bro! 


You're not 6'5".

Your genetics DO suck.

You're a POSER just like TacoBell.

You're likely a fatass or a skinny asshole sitting at their computer passing judgement on people superior to you.

If you are 6'5", You probably have the physique of a stick figure.


I'm calling you out to post your pictures and prove your claims. You and TacoBell.

Both of you refuse to post your recent pictures. Why? Because you're nobodies sitting at home pretending to be bodybuilders, judging the top naturals claiming that they must ALL use steroids, saying they are ALL liars. All because you're physique is crap and you're jealous.


If my physique was anything close to the top naturals, Even if I used steroids, I wouldn't refuse to post it. If I were concerned with my Identiy I would distort my face a bit or something like that.

MuscleMcMannus

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6236
Re: Ideal natural physique
« Reply #298 on: February 17, 2009, 07:40:37 PM »

You're not 6'5".

Your genetics DO suck.

You're a POSER just like TacoBell.

You're likely a fatass or a skinny asshole sitting at their computer passing judgement on people superior to you.

If you are 6'5", You probably have the physique of a stick figure.


I'm calling you out to post your pictures and prove your claims. You and TacoBell.

Both of you refuse to post your recent pictures. Why? Because you're nobodies sitting at home pretending to be bodybuilders, judging the top naturals claiming that they must ALL use steroids, saying they are ALL liars. All because you're physique is crap and you're jealous.


If my physique was anything close to the top naturals, Even if I used steroids, I wouldn't refuse to post it. If I were concerned with my Identiy I would distort my face a bit or something like that.

You're right.  I'm only 5'6.  I look like a bag of smashed assholes.  I have the muscle of a 12 year old girl.  In fact your grandmother probably can lift more than I can on her worst day.  But Layne Norton AINT NATURAL no matter what you say!  Sucka! 

And hell no I'm not posting my pics on getbig......photoshop capital of the internet.  10 years from now they'd probably end up on some homo site! 

liberalismo

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1335
Re: Ideal natural physique
« Reply #299 on: February 17, 2009, 07:43:37 PM »
You're right.  I'm only 5'6.  I look like a bag of smashed assholes.  I have the muscle of a 12 year old girl.  In fact your grandmother probably can lift more than I can on her worst day.  But Layne Norton AINT NATURAL no matter what you say!  Sucka! 

And hell no I'm not posting my pics on getbig......photoshop capital of the internet.  10 years from now they'd probably end up on some homo site! 


Pathetic... ::)