Author Topic: Natural or Not?  (Read 4957 times)

Method101

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 8455
Natural or Not?
« on: February 14, 2009, 08:56:54 AM »

Quote
I was born on 1-1-84 (25yrs old) and have been training since I was 17 (8 years total training).

People have different ideas of whats natural, so you'll have to be the judge. (one time some guy told me he was "ALL NATURAL" and didn't take protein powder or anything like that cause he wanted to stay all natural).

But I can tell you what supplements I have taken/take so you can decide (this is my best guess/effort at listing everything I have ever taken):

whey protein (Species' Isolyze: http://www.speciesnutrition.com/orde...sp?idProduct=3)

creatine

dextrose

BCAA

glutamine

beta alanine

waxy maize

Vitamins (the standard/usual: c, e, b-complex, multi, beta carotene, zinc)

Joint supplement (Arthrolyze)

caffeine (i used to take pills before training, but now just from coffee--cheaper, tastes nice)

ephedrine (only when i really, realy need it--leg day and i feel like shit)
(a friend of mine gave me a few bottles of this to sample: http://www.ximohealth.com/content.asp?page_id=4)

weight gainer (used to take n-large2 when i started, havent taken in 7 years)

EFA supplement (took Omegalyze during last contest prep)

I used to work at max muscle so I have had samples of protein bars, no explode, MRP's and some caffeine based energy drinks.

wavelength

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 10156
  • ~~~
Re: Natural or Not?
« Reply #1 on: February 14, 2009, 09:07:36 AM »
Nopes, he's on a serious waxy maize cycle.

saucetradomous

  • Competitors
  • Getbig IV
  • *****
  • Posts: 2967
Re: Natural or Not?
« Reply #2 on: February 14, 2009, 12:31:31 PM »
This again.

Natural.

Bobby

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5219
  • is da lordes plan
Re: Natural or Not?
« Reply #3 on: February 14, 2009, 01:06:31 PM »
supernatural

all dextrose
tank u jesus

Griffith

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 8827
  • .......
Re: Natural or Not?
« Reply #4 on: February 14, 2009, 01:19:50 PM »
I'd say natural.
He's just being clever with the way he's posing to give the illusion of more thickness.

He's legs are big but if he's leg-pressing 400 kg's for reps or whatever, then why not?

radioflyer46

  • Getbig II
  • **
  • Posts: 90
Re: Natural or Not?
« Reply #5 on: February 14, 2009, 01:25:52 PM »
   Actualy vary hot!!

bodybuilder1234

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3749
  • Manny Pacquiao KO Floyd 1
Re: Natural or Not?
« Reply #6 on: February 14, 2009, 02:18:16 PM »
Natural with great genetics
The guy had a good body before he even weight trained

3Dkiller

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1533
  • Fuck The New World Order
Re: Natural or Not?
« Reply #7 on: February 14, 2009, 04:21:09 PM »
definitly not natural.
TEAM WOLF

IronMagazine.com

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2761
  • IronMag Bodybuilding Blog Online Since 2001
Re: Natural or Not?
« Reply #8 on: February 14, 2009, 04:24:06 PM »
highly unlikely

tbombz

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 19350
  • Psalms 150
Re: Natural or Not?
« Reply #9 on: February 14, 2009, 04:25:34 PM »
how much does he weigh in that picture ?

tommywishbone

  • Competitors II
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 20507
  • Biscuit
Re: Natural or Not?
« Reply #10 on: February 14, 2009, 04:36:44 PM »
Maybe. Maybe not. Maybe go fuck yourself.
a

just_a_pilgrim

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2455
Re: Natural or Not?
« Reply #11 on: February 14, 2009, 04:38:31 PM »
Going off that pic i say juiced, but the lighting is used very well.

Overall no visable signs of juicing though (unless you want to say elevation in the traps but it's not that much) and there are freaks out there so who knows. Sometimes it's hard to tell. I would say he's not that big but the shot shows the illusion of being bigger, which is what bodybuilding is all about.

Bobby

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5219
  • is da lordes plan
Re: Natural or Not?
« Reply #12 on: February 14, 2009, 04:41:12 PM »
how much does he weigh in that picture ?

i think it's around 190
tank u jesus

saucetradomous

  • Competitors
  • Getbig IV
  • *****
  • Posts: 2967
Re: Natural or Not?
« Reply #13 on: February 14, 2009, 05:07:59 PM »
Maybe. Maybe not. Maybe go fuck yourself.

The Departed was a good movie

Bobby

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5219
  • is da lordes plan
Re: Natural or Not?
« Reply #14 on: February 14, 2009, 05:10:14 PM »
back to the futures were great too
tank u jesus

andreisdaman

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 16720
Re: Natural or Not?
« Reply #15 on: February 14, 2009, 06:06:07 PM »
I think he's on something...looks to have good genetics and just using a little Dbol or something like that in order to cut up..back is unreal....and yes I will admit he is posing in a way to maximize what he has and to look bigger and the lighting is very flattering as well.....but NOT totally natural....

the_swami

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1776
Re: Natural or Not?
« Reply #16 on: February 14, 2009, 06:41:38 PM »
200 % all natural ::)

you cannot get this thickness, muscle seperation, density and leaness naturally

cmon get big, wake up and smell the testosterone

The Coach

  • Guest
Re: Natural or Not?
« Reply #17 on: February 14, 2009, 06:43:32 PM »

BIG DUB

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2534
Re: Natural or Not?
« Reply #18 on: February 14, 2009, 07:07:26 PM »
shopped, definately shopped..

XXXII/LX

  • Competitors II
  • Getbig III
  • *****
  • Posts: 521
  • I have to return some video tapes.
Re: Natural or Not?
« Reply #19 on: February 14, 2009, 07:52:42 PM »
Maybe. Maybe not. Maybe go fuck yourself.

Great movie.

QuakerOats

  • Time Out
  • Getbig V
  • *
  • Posts: 13621
  • bring amberlamps!!!
Re: Natural or Not?
« Reply #20 on: February 14, 2009, 07:54:00 PM »
I'd say natural.
He's just being clever with the way he's posing to give the illusion of more thickness.

He's legs are big but if he's leg-pressing 400 kg's for reps or whatever, then why not?
880 pound leg press!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! damn that's insane!!!! ;D

The Wizard of Truth

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 9540
  • Fallen Angel
Re: Natural or Not?
« Reply #21 on: February 15, 2009, 04:32:06 AM »
Great physique

mesmorph78

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 10953
  • there can only be one...
Re: Natural or Not?
« Reply #22 on: February 15, 2009, 12:01:38 PM »
great build
big legs
choice is an illusion

dustin

  • Guest
Re: Natural or Not?
« Reply #23 on: February 15, 2009, 12:17:34 PM »
I want to think he's in the top bracket of fucking phenomenal naturals... but then the more I read about his diet I started to think he's on a low dose of gear. I don't think it's anything insane. But he is on a very low fat diet year round. Cholesterol is a precursor to testosterone and I can't believe that someone dieting that religiously all year (this is an off season picture, for him this is almost "fat") there's no way he's doing this clean.

Either way, I don't think he's on a myriad of drugs. I think he's on a therapeutic or slightly supraphysiological level of test, no other androgens. He definitely has his diet in check and knows his body inside and out. I wish I had the dedication to eat and drink as meticulously as him. He knows his body so well. Very intuitive.

tleilaxutank

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2006
  • If it feels good twitter it
Re: Natural or Not?
« Reply #24 on: February 15, 2009, 12:21:26 PM »
Maybe. Maybe not. Maybe go fuck yourself.

Fucking firefighters are bunch of homos.