Author Topic: The male ideal  (Read 10894 times)

Figo

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 8101
The male ideal
« on: February 15, 2009, 05:47:02 AM »
The basis of the ideal male physique.

I think he needs more size personally. Maybe some underwear.


Figo

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 8101
Re: The male ideal
« Reply #1 on: February 15, 2009, 05:51:13 AM »
If they had McDonalds in Michelangelo's day...


Figo

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 8101
Re: The male ideal
« Reply #2 on: February 15, 2009, 05:54:04 AM »

Sharma

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2321
  • TEAMNASSER4LIFE
Re: The male ideal
« Reply #3 on: February 15, 2009, 05:55:37 AM »
This to me is like a greek statue come to life. look also how handsome his face is like shawn connery.

kiwiol

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 18393
  • Who is John Galt?
Re: The male ideal
« Reply #4 on: February 15, 2009, 05:56:48 AM »
the ideal male physique.

The question is, according to who?

My idea of the ideal physique

spinnis

  • Guest
Re: The male ideal
« Reply #5 on: February 15, 2009, 05:58:37 AM »


Yeah Women would love that, Until you tried to have sex with them.

Get Rowdy

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1704
Re: The male ideal
« Reply #6 on: February 15, 2009, 05:59:58 AM »


That's quite the jungle he's got growing downstairs.

Sharma

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2321
  • TEAMNASSER4LIFE
Re: The male ideal
« Reply #7 on: February 15, 2009, 06:00:29 AM »
no way, dorian's physique is far too unaesthetic and disgusting to be the male ideal. his arms are torn to shit stumps, revolting, vomit inducing waist and hideous face. a lop sided and uneven monster type, not the greek type ideal.

no aesthetics

Figo

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 8101
Re: The male ideal
« Reply #8 on: February 15, 2009, 06:02:32 AM »
The question is, according to who?

My idea of the ideal physique

The general populace.

I agree. This is mine:








kiwiol

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 18393
  • Who is John Galt?
Re: The male ideal
« Reply #9 on: February 15, 2009, 06:04:32 AM »
no way, dorian's physique is far too unaesthetic and disgusting to be the male ideal. his arms are torn to shit stumps, revolting, vomit inducing waist and hideous face. a lop sided and uneven monster type, not the greek type ideal.

no aesthetics

Sounds like you are just bitter that he handed your boy his ass every time they stood next to each other - I mean, he beat Nasser with a torn arm - that's how much better he was. Bow when you see greatness, don't be bitter ;D

Oh, and his arms aren't torn in those pics I've posted

dr.chimps

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 28635
  • Chimpus ergo sum
Re: The male ideal
« Reply #10 on: February 15, 2009, 06:04:39 AM »
This to me is like a greek statue come to life. look also how handsome his face is like shawn connery.
It's Sean, and he's definitely not Muslim. Your political filter needs adjusting, this morning. Obviously, on the fritz.

Cleanest Natural

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 28661
  • Diet first, all else second
Re: The male ideal
« Reply #11 on: February 15, 2009, 06:06:44 AM »
Sounds like you are just bitter that he handed your boy his ass every time they stood next to each other - I mean, he beat Nasser with a torn arm - that's how much better he was. Bow when you see greatness, don't be bitter ;D

Oh, and his arms aren't torn in those pics I've posted
;)

Sharma

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2321
  • TEAMNASSER4LIFE
Re: The male ideal
« Reply #12 on: February 15, 2009, 06:10:20 AM »
he did not beat Nasser fairly. everyone accepts that 1997 was a fix. Yates only actually deserved 2 of his Olympias, the rest were stolen from far more deserving athletes (mainly nasser)

but anyway, Yates is not and never have been aesthetic. his physique is hideous and disgusting with giant, bloated waist and shitty abs. terrible arms too and he have narrow little AIDS quads. he only have a giant back. nothing else. 

Figo

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 8101
Re: The male ideal
« Reply #13 on: February 15, 2009, 06:15:03 AM »
El Sonbaty looked better in his earlier days.


dr.chimps

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 28635
  • Chimpus ergo sum
Re: The male ideal
« Reply #14 on: February 15, 2009, 06:16:26 AM »
he did not beat Nasser fairly. everyone accepts that 1997 was a fix. Yates only actually deserved 2 of his Olympias, the rest were stolen from far more deserving athletes (mainly nasser)

but anyway, Yates is not and never have been aesthetic. his physique is hideous and disgusting with giant, bloated waist and shitty abs. terrible arms too and he have narrow little AIDS quads. he only have a giant back. nothing else. 
Wow. Your political filter really is broken. Not a word/whine about racism!? 'Course you did mention AIDS, so that covers your gay hatred component.

Figo

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 8101
Re: The male ideal
« Reply #15 on: February 15, 2009, 06:17:11 AM »
Younger Yates


The Wizard of Truth

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 9540
  • Fallen Angel
Re: The male ideal
« Reply #16 on: February 15, 2009, 06:21:07 AM »
Ban Sharma

Sharma

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2321
  • TEAMNASSER4LIFE
Re: The male ideal
« Reply #17 on: February 15, 2009, 06:24:30 AM »
El Sonbaty looked better in his earlier days.



I don't know about better but he certainly looked amazing. Still, when he pack on the mass he was superb. There has never been a true mass monster (that Nass was) was his unique mixture of condition, symmetry , shape and aesthtic beauty. even GH15 say that this is "as good as bodybuilding ever got"

Griffith

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 8787
  • .......
Re: The male ideal
« Reply #18 on: February 15, 2009, 06:24:46 AM »
 8)

The Wizard of Truth

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 9540
  • Fallen Angel
Re: The male ideal
« Reply #19 on: February 15, 2009, 06:26:52 AM »
No disputing that Nasser was amazing but 'The male Ideal' would never be a Muslim

Figo

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 8101
Re: The male ideal
« Reply #20 on: February 15, 2009, 06:28:43 AM »
I don't know about better but he certainly looked amazing. Still, when he pack on the mass he was superb. There has never been a true mass monster (that Nass was) was his unique mixture of condition, symmetry , shape and aesthtic beauty. even GH15 say that this is "as good as bodybuilding ever got"

I'd be more conservative with the use of the word "beauty".

dr.chimps

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 28635
  • Chimpus ergo sum
Re: The male ideal
« Reply #21 on: February 15, 2009, 06:29:16 AM »
I don't know about better but he certainly looked amazing. Still, when he pack on the mass he was superb. There has never been a true mass monster (that Nass was) was his unique mixture of condition, symmetry , shape and aesthtic beauty. even GH15 say that this is "as good as bodybuilding ever got"
The guy that believes in Element 115, unobtanium, and spaceships and little green men!? You need to vet your references better. Oh brother.  

Griffith

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 8787
  • .......
Re: The male ideal
« Reply #22 on: February 15, 2009, 06:30:49 AM »
 :)

The Wizard of Truth

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 9540
  • Fallen Angel
Re: The male ideal
« Reply #23 on: February 15, 2009, 06:33:28 AM »
The male Ideal...Good looks,doting father and provider

Sharma

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2321
  • TEAMNASSER4LIFE
Re: The male ideal
« Reply #24 on: February 15, 2009, 06:33:53 AM »
The guy that believes in Element 115, unobtanium, and spaceships and little green men!? You need to vet your references better. Oh brother. 

GH15 forgot more about pro bodybuilding than most of you will ever know.