Author Topic: Challenge for NZMM (Read 4622 times)

danielson · « **on:** February 15, 2009, 12:29:28 PM »

He is calling me a liar, so I should have the right to defend myself. Btw, I am getting sick of all of these paranoid fucks around here. I have no gimmicks, not sure why people think about me so often.

Quote from: nzmusclemonster on February 15, 2009, 12:19:26 PM

I know for a fact that you post under at least 2 gimmick accounts. Why don't you just come clean and stop trying to pull the wool over our eyes.

danielson · « **Reply #1 on:** February 15, 2009, 12:30:58 PM »

So, who are my gimmicks then you fkn liar? I deserve a chance to defend myself.

nzmusclemonster · « **Reply #2 on:** February 15, 2009, 12:32:43 PM »

As I said in the other thread, I'm not into name and shame. I am just trying to give you a little push in the right direction so that maybe you will confess what you have done.

danielson · « **Reply #3 on:** February 15, 2009, 12:33:44 PM »

Quote from: nzmusclemonster on February 15, 2009, 12:32:43 PM

As I said in the other thread, I'm not into name and shame. I am just trying to give you a little push in the right direction so that maybe you will confess what you have done.

All you need to do is tell me who you think my gimmicks are, you called me a liar already. You owe it to me to at least tell me who you think I post as. I will then prove I am not them.

nzmusclemonster · « **Reply #4 on:** February 15, 2009, 12:35:52 PM »

To be honest I feel kind of bad now that I have made this revelation. Your gimmicks are probably to do with your bi-polar and I'm guessing it is somewhat theraputic to post under your gimmicks when you are feeling angry.

danielson · « **Reply #5 on:** February 15, 2009, 12:36:28 PM »

Quote from: nzmusclemonster on February 15, 2009, 12:35:52 PM

To be honest I feel kind of bad now that I have made this revelation. Your gimmicks are probably to do with your bi-polar and I'm guessing it is somewhat theraputic to post under your gimmicks when you are feeling angry.

Who are my gimmicks? Do I not deserve a chance to defend myself?

nzmusclemonster · « **Reply #6 on:** February 15, 2009, 12:38:22 PM »

I was trying to help you to take it upon yourself to reveal them. Obviously you want to cling tight to these gimmicks for a little longer $:-\$

danielson · « **Reply #7 on:** February 15, 2009, 12:42:26 PM »

Quote from: nzmusclemonster on February 15, 2009, 12:38:22 PM

I was trying to help you to take it upon yourself to reveal them. Obviously you want to cling tight to these gimmicks for a little longer $:-\$

Ok listen. Do you know how you go from job to job, delivering shit or whatever you do. I have a different type of job than you. I CAN NOT access Getbig at work, my computer will not allow it. So if you look back for 9 months or so between 7 a.m and 5 p.m. Monday through Thursday(eastern) you will not find a single post made by me. None. Now check the gimmicks and see if they are posting at that time. Again, I have not made a single post during those days and hours, for 9 plus months. I can not log in at work. I guarantee these gimmicks you are talking about post day and night.

kiwiol · « **Reply #8 on:** February 15, 2009, 12:51:20 PM »

There's an easy way to address the gimmick situation if you are accused - get the poster and the accused gimmick account to make a post at the exact same time, maybe on 2 different threads or even 2 different boards. So if NZMM thinks Danny has a gimmick, all Danny needs to do is make a post in one thread and have the supposed gimmick account also post at the same time. You can't post from the same IP address within 32 seconds of your last post, so if both accounts manage to post at the same time, then there goes the gimmick accusation out of the window.

No need to bother with IP addresses this way.

danielson · « **Reply #9 on:** February 15, 2009, 12:52:35 PM »

Quote from: kiwiol on February 15, 2009, 12:51:20 PM

There's an easy way to address the gimmick situation if you are accused - get the poster and the accused gimmick account to make a post at the exact same time, maybe on 2 different threads or even 2 different boards. So if NZMM thinks Danny has a gimmick, all Danny needs to do is make a post in one thread and have the supposed gimmick account also post at the same time. You can't post from the same IP address within 32 seconds of your last post, so if both accounts manage to post at the same time, then there goes the gimmick accusation out of the window.

No need to bother with IP addresses this way.

He won't even tell me who he is accusing me of being.

nzmusclemonster · « **Reply #10 on:** February 15, 2009, 12:53:07 PM »

I have a life so I'm not going to waste time and see when your gimmicks were posting. I know it would be a fall from grace if you were to admit this, but it would be a step in the right direction for you.

Soundness · « **Reply #11 on:** February 15, 2009, 12:53:15 PM »

Quote from: kiwiol on February 15, 2009, 12:51:20 PM

There's an easy way to address the gimmick situation if you are accused - get the poster and the accused gimmick account to make a post at the exact same time, maybe on 2 different threads or even 2 different boards. So if NZMM thinks Danny has a gimmick, all Danny needs to do is make a post in one thread and have the supposed gimmick account also post at the same time. You can't post from the same IP address within 32 seconds of your last post, so if both accounts manage to post at the same time, then there goes the gimmick accusation out of the window.

No need to bother with IP addresses this way.

Great idea, kiwiol.

The only exception would be if someone was running proxy, but otherwise this would work perfectly.

danielson · « **Reply #12 on:** February 15, 2009, 12:54:18 PM »

Quote from: nzmusclemonster on February 15, 2009, 12:53:07 PM

I have a life so I'm not going to waste time and see when your gimmicks were posting. I know it would be a fall from grace if you were to admit this, but it would be a step in the right direction for you.

Whatever. Think what you want.

Soundness · « **Reply #13 on:** February 15, 2009, 12:56:47 PM »

Quote from: nzmusclemonster on February 15, 2009, 12:53:07 PM

I have a life so I'm not going to waste time and see when your gimmicks were posting. I know it would be a fall from grace if you were to admit this, but it would be a step in the right direction for you.

= "I believe you're running gimmick(s) but I don't know what screennames they are."

or

= "I no longer believe you're running any gimmick(s), but I've dug myself into a whole and don't want to even try to climb out."

One of these.

danielson · « **Reply #14 on:** February 15, 2009, 12:58:43 PM »

Quote from: Soundness on February 15, 2009, 12:56:47 PM

= "I believe you're running gimmick(s) but I don't know what screennames they are."

or

= "I no longer believe you're running any gimmick(s), but I've dug myself into a whole and don't want to even try to climb out."

One of these.

To accuse me of having gimmicks, but not even be willing to name which ones is pretty low of him.

kiwiol · « **Reply #15 on:** February 15, 2009, 12:59:17 PM »

Quote from: Soundness on February 15, 2009, 12:53:15 PM

Great idea, kiwiol.

The only exception would be if someone was running proxy, but otherwise this would work perfectly.

Proxy would mask your IP address, but you can't have 2 separate IP addresses from the same connection even with a proxy. Unless someone's got 2 different connections in the same premises and it's like the movies where they hit 'post' in one terminal and dive (in slow motion) to the other terminal to hit 'post' and have the pre-typed messages appear simultaneously

Soundness · « **Reply #16 on:** February 15, 2009, 12:59:44 PM »

Quote from: danielson on February 15, 2009, 12:58:43 PM

To accuse me of having gimmicks, but even be willing to name which ones is pretty low of him.

That being said, I believe this one is accurate:

"I no longer believe you're running any gimmick(s), but I've dug myself into a whole and don't want to even try to climb out."

nzmusclemonster · « **Reply #17 on:** February 15, 2009, 12:59:57 PM »

Quote from: Soundness on February 15, 2009, 12:56:47 PM

= "I believe you're running gimmick(s) but I don't know what screennames they are."

or

= "I no longer believe you're running any gimmick(s), but I've dug myself into a whole and don't want to even try to climb out."

One of these.

We know English isn't your first language AXA, but please make an effort.

danielson · « **Reply #18 on:** February 15, 2009, 01:01:04 PM »

Quote from: Soundness on February 15, 2009, 12:59:44 PM

That being said, I believe this one is accurate:

"I no longer believe you're running any gimmick(s), but I've dug myself into a whole and don't want to even try to climb out."

He knows I don't have gimmicks, he is just being a dick. If he thought I had a gimmick he would just throw a name out there. Fuck him.

kiwiol · « **Reply #19 on:** February 15, 2009, 01:02:22 PM »

Quote from: nzmusclemonster on February 15, 2009, 12:53:07 PM

I have a life so I'm not going to waste time and see when your gimmicks were posting. I know it would be a fall from grace if you were to admit this, but it would be a step in the right direction for you.

Mate, you have gimmicks yourself and while I was away a few months ago, you posted some BS about meeting me in real life and finding that I'm Bi-polar (which I'm not - I'm pretty f*cked up in a different way, but that's another topic altogether

). So if you are accusing Danny, don't do it in a half-assed way. Either say you are just pretending like you know stuff that you actually don't or name the accounts you think he is using alternatively. Don't be a fag and act all mysterious, saying you know that he has gimmicks but won't name them.

danielson · « **Reply #20 on:** February 15, 2009, 01:04:35 PM »

Quote from: kiwiol on February 15, 2009, 01:02:22 PM

So if you are accusing Danny, don't do it in a half-assed way. Either say you are just pretending like you know stuff that you actually don't or name the accounts you think he is using alternatively. Don't be a fag and act all mysterious, saying you know that he has gimmicks but won't name them.

He won't do it because he is a bitch. I have posted under this account, the Harley account to fuck with Magoo once and some account called the Passion for an hour when I was in TO like 2 years ago. That is it. I have no gimmicks.

Soundness · « **Reply #21 on:** February 15, 2009, 01:06:33 PM »

Quote from: nzmusclemonster on February 15, 2009, 12:59:57 PM

We know English isn't your first language AXA, but please make an effort.

I'm helping you out, nzmm.

BTW, you'll find the first thread I ever started interesting:
http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?topic=249091.msg3499817#msg3499817

danielson · « **Reply #22 on:** February 15, 2009, 01:08:30 PM »

Come on you Nomad, who are my gimmicks?

drkaje · « **Reply #23 on:** February 15, 2009, 01:08:56 PM »

Quote from: danielson on February 15, 2009, 01:04:35 PM

He won't do it because he is a bitch. I have posted under this account, the Harley account to fuck with Magoo once and some account called the Passion for an hour when I was in TO like 2 years ago. That is it. I have no gimmicks.

A gimmick free zone wouldn't have this issue.

kiwiol · « **Reply #24 on:** February 15, 2009, 01:09:11 PM »

Quote from: danielson on February 15, 2009, 01:04:35 PM

He won't do it because he is a bitch. I have posted under this account, the Harley account to fuck with Magoo once and some account called the Passion for an hour when I was in TO like 2 years ago. That is it. I have no gimmicks.

Fair enough. There is nothing more to say. NZ has been called out and he needs to tell us who exactly he thinks are your gimmick accounts.